1. I am vegan. I know what I’m talking about.
2. All kinds of people call themselves a vegan without without actually being one.
3. It’s not a no true Scotsman because I’m using the actual definition for what veganism is, the one given by the vegan society. You’re making a category error here.
4. I will absolutely fight language when language is wrong. I have had several times in my life where I gave up the colloquial definitions that I’ve lived with in order to have my views more accurately reflect the words that members of specific communities use to define themselves. Otherwise I’d think that bisexuals only dated men and women, ace people are incapable of romantic attraction, all feminists hate men, and that trans people can’t be trans without clinically diagnoseable dysphoria.
5. Thanks for the luck, but I’m blocking you. Have a lovely day.

I’m sure you can get away with telling trans people what they are without trans people or defining atheism without atheists. But sure. Sound off like the ignorant ass you are.

The fact that most people don’t think about it critically doesn’t mean it shouldn’t be explained and telling people who belong to a group that they can’t tell you what their group specifically is about is entitled and absurd.

Veganism is not a diet and there are a number of diets you may adopt while being vegan.

I can accept that the harm reductionism that Danielle is advocating for is good compared to the lack of restraint we have as a culture, but this does not make it vegan.

The issue here is that veganism is regarded as a diet by the popular culture and fad dieters, not vegans. Your insistance that we not try to correct the record is like asking middle easterners not to set things straight when people assume all of them are Arabians or Muslim.

Okay so I filled a purse with bees like this sign said and now I can’t get back into my car. They’ve been swarming this whole time and I’m too scared to open the door.

^_ Thanks. I’ll try to remember to take a look at it later.

Hi! Sorry for the late reply I uh… kinda forgot Lemmy existed for a bit, not gonna lie.

As for methodology, right now I’m going to say recon for now but I’m not sure if it’ll stay that way in the future. Either way I see this as building a foundation if that makes sense ^^;;

Assuming that he was doing this in order to boost his popularity due to war, how does he fuck this up and get bullied over the Epstein files for another year? Because he’s GOING to fuck this up.

Eh, Europe is an important enough market that they could use legislation to get the desired result out of hardware vendors, or something close enough to it. If the EU or a majority of European nations stipulated that everything had to be compatible with open source operating systems I’m pretty confident that it would happen. There would be pushback. Likely they’d claim that it’d impede their ability to turn a profit, create development cost issues, and be extremely insecure, but once things were set into motion they would find a way to make it work.