I model and doodle stuff
- 39 Posts
- 82 Comments
Yes! I love all of Fishtrout’s goobers and swordfish was one of the inspirations
Thank you!
I tried to keep the runes same as the official art work
Wiki says, “The bioluminescent stripes on a SeaWing’s body are used to converse underwater. – Different combinations of stripes indicate different words in Aquatic.”
No dragons were lift in this image, but if they are yapping too much, you got to hold their snout and give a smooch
Kaelygon@lemmy.worldto
Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•Realized 99% of all my chargers are USB-C. This can only mean one thing. New USB bout to drop!
10·4 months agoThis could mean that OP has either +100 usb chargers, or a fraction of a non-USB-C charger
I substituted every single include into a single 166 000 line file and sent it. Grok froze :(
Thank you! After the flag I was thinking I’d leave it at simple shading, but then I decided to do do some muscle anatomy learning. Shading is my fav part of drawing, it adds so much depth
Anon, ☝️Presenting to the Emergency Room
Kaelygon@lemmy.worldto
Technology@lemmy.world•Don’t watermark your legal PDFs with purple dragons in suits - Ars TechnicaEnglish
4·6 months agophew, I dodged this one. My logo is just a purple dragon with no suit
It’s condensed content with simpler terms and plain English, which is helpful for those who aren’t native speakers, like Gamba said.
Simple wiki also comes in handy in topics like biology, which can have very specialized vocabulary.But in this context, the people who unironically believe in things like the moon not being a reflector can’t be reasoned with. They won’t change their mind no matter how simple English you explain the fact.
Kaelygon@lemmy.worldto
Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•Interesting new symbols for bathroom doors
5·10 months agoFinnish bank osuuspankki logo comes close to qp outline, but it has extra shaft at the top
Kaelygon@lemmy.worldto
Technology@lemmy.world•Stop using generative AI as a search engineEnglish
10·11 months agoGoogle search results are often completely unrelated so it’s not any better. If the thing I’m looking for is obscure, AI often finds some thread that I can follow, but I always double check that information.
Know your tool limits, after hundreds of prompts I’ve learned pretty well when the AI is spitting bullshit answers. Real people on the internet can be just as wrong and biased, so it’s best to find multiple independent sources
thankfully modern ones like molten salt reactors have passive safety, where they stop the reaction if overheating occurs.
edit: My mistake, there’s no active commercial molten salt reactors.
But nuclear power is very safe nowadays because of the multiple fail-safes, which some can still be passive like emergency cooling.
I much rather get electricity from magic rocks than destroying rain forest in developing countries drilling oil, gas or mining coal.
The biggest risk in nuclear is environmental disasters like in Fukushima’s case, which is the last significant nuclear incident in past 13 years
I loved every bit of Rain World! But I ended up quitting it mid play through when it became too hard. I found a way to gather stacks of berries to have enough reattempts for the hard parts, but then got lost where I was even supposed to go and gave up after ~25 hours playtime
Whoop, I mixed up dark souls 3 with Elden ring. Though, the same applies. I did like the gritty atmosphere and lore. The main issue I had was the learning curve and when trying to playing co-op there was no way to turn off strangers joining what I recall. But I bet by now there’s mods for all of that like you said.
I once made the mistake googling easy mode for Elden ring that someone gifted to me. Once I saw the gatekeeping on Reddit, I decided it’s not a game for me and uninstalled. I’m sorry that I suck at video games
Kaelygon@lemmy.worldOPto
math@lemmy.world•I generalized constructing divisibility rules by any prime
1·1 year agoIt appears to always run in ~30 milliseconds regardless of the tested number, so this might be O(1) until some bottleneck kicks in. Though I have yet to verify the complexity as the quality of division rule depends on a,b and c ranges.
Edit: after some testing it’s some logarithmic complexity when P is bigger than 10^2000P size, time seconds 10^3000, 3.11 10^4000, 6.43 10^5000, 11.27 10^6000, 17.69 10^7000, 26.31 10^8000, 37.09Plotting these gave about O(log(P)^2.5)
The bRange, math.gcd() and reciprocal scale with P digit count but rest of the calculations are O(1).
I have no idea why you would need 10^8000 divisibility rule designed hand calculations, but you can get one under a minute and this isn’t even multithreaded!
Kaelygon@lemmy.worldOPto
math@lemmy.world•I generalized constructing divisibility rules by any prime
1·1 year agoFunnily enough, I just sped up my own solution by 25000% without compromising anything.
https://pastebin.com/Dkbq2chVI realized that multiplying the divisor P by its non-zero reciprocal digits, gets you near 10^n which are ideal numbers for the divisibility rules. Which should have been obvious since
n * (1/n) = 1, and cutting off the reciprocal results in approximation of 1, which can be scaled by 10^b.
e.g. finding divisibility rules for 71/7=0.14285... 7*14=98 7*143=1001 7*1429=10003The first script was very naive brute force approach.
So instead of searching every combination of a, b and c, I can just check the near multiples ofP*reciprocal.
The variables can be solved byP*N = a*10^b + cwhen b is given and a is 1 to 9
7*1429=10003would expand toP*N=1*10^4+3









I’m not great of any of these so I’ll be a commoner. Unless LGBT+ Paladin counts