An ironic win for gay people, I guess.
- 0 Posts
- 51 Comments
Wait, that’s 1.25 per liter. Isn’t that kind of expensive?
Katzelle3@lemmy.worldto
Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•You've got to stick up for the little guy
10·4 months agoOk, be real here. What kind of lobbying work are you actually able to accuse Nintendo of?
Katzelle3@lemmy.worldto
Fuck Cars@lemmy.world•This excellent road design brought to you courtesy the brain trust in Uttar Pradesh, India /sEnglish
14·4 months agoThere is plenty of space for a roundabout on this intersection
Katzelle3@lemmy.worldto
Technology@lemmy.world•Google confirms more ads on your paid YouTube Premium Lite soonEnglish
17·5 months agoIt’s Premium, but not really.
Well, technically speaking, we all are in space.
“Här går man, Herr Gårmann.” as in “Hier geht man, Herr Gehmann.”?
Katzelle3@lemmy.worldto
Canada@lemmy.ca•Conservative MP gives up seat for Pierre Poilievre to run in byelection
3·6 months agoSomeone please tell Trump about this.
Yes, Windows does that. It’s called S Mode.
Doesn’t the Apple Watch already fulfill the function of an iPod Nano? It works with Bluetooth headphones and has 16 GB of storage you can use for music, which is a lot by iPod Nano standards.
The left image looks like an old Cray computer. Could be an interesting indicator of the age of the image or the artist who made it.
Reading it the wrong way doesn’t really change the meaning though.
Katzelle3@lemmy.worldto
Canada@lemmy.ca•White House official pushes to axe Canada from Five Eyes intelligence group
23·8 months agoSo they’re gonna be called Four Eyes then?
Katzelle3@lemmy.worldto
Fuck Cars@lemmy.world•The issue is not space, but how we move through itEnglish
1·9 months agodeleted by creator
Katzelle3@lemmy.worldto
Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•Sorry babe, the US never invested into public transit at the level we were supposed
4·9 months agoThe most mind blowing thing to me is how close those places are to city centers, like wouldn’t they think that there might be a visual clash if you place bungalows right next to skyscrapers?
I don’t think it’s correct though.
The graph suggests that you should be looking at a 65-inch screen from a distance of 120 cm for resolutions above 4k to be worth it. I interpret that as the distance at which the screen-door effect becomes visible, so this seems awfully close actually.
A 65-inch screen has a width of 144 cm, which gives you a 100 degree angle of vision from the left edge to the right edge of the screen. Divide the approximate horizontal resolution of 4000 pixels by 100 and you get an angular pixel density of 40 PPD (Pixels Per Degree).
However for the pixel gaps to become too small to be seen or in other words for the screen-door effect to disappear, you need an angular pixel density of 60 PPD. That means you can sit at a more reasonable distance of 220 cm in front of a 65-inch screen for resolutions above 4k to be worth it.
This is still too close for comfort though, given that the resulting horizontal angle of vision is 66 degrees. The THX cinema standard recommends a horizontal viewing angle of 40 degrees.
So multiply 40 degrees by 60 pixels per degree to get a horizontal resolution of 2400 pixels. That means the perfect resolution for TVs is actually QHD.
Katzelle3@lemmy.worldto
Android@lemmy.world•APKMirror is no longer allowing downloads of TikTok, Lemon8, citing US Bill H.R.7521, setting a dangerous precedent for sideloading applicationsEnglish
14·10 months agoPretty sure americans have more reasons to use a VPN than europeans do.


“my turning point” good one