Honestly, Gabe’s probably doing it because he wants one for himself (and doesn’t trust fucking Elon to do it). That’s a lot of what powers his decisions. That’s how we ended up with the steam deck too.

I mean, that’s the default path length limit on most systems, but it isn’t an inherently fixed value. It’s just what everyone uses by convention.

It’s fine as long as you understand what you’re using. If you’re handling state secrets, probably shouldn’t put those on telegram. If you’re handling your grandmother’s pie recipe, you’re probably fine.

That’s how I read it to begin with.

Nice! Thank you! I didn’t even realize it was a render. Damn it’s well done.

To be fair, that still may be end to end encrypted, just not the ends you were hoping for.

No, Detroit has (optionally) a couple lines of sauce on top, and most places I know that make Detroit style skip the sauce lines. Chicago style has sauce on top of the entire thing.

Though I just looked it up and it looks like there are multiple different “Chicago style” definitions.

Thought Chicago was known for the weird-ass sauce on top of the cheese pizza.

I may be the only one here who doesn’t care. Long as it’s understandable, it’s good enough.

Sometimes file operations are easier in GUI. That’s… pretty close to being all though. As long as you’re willing to use the best tool for the job as needed, that’s what counts.

Whose brilliant idea was it to demo this with a wallpaper that looks like a shitty diagonal screen fold?

Eh, I’m not about to stop using Firefox, but the complaint is valid. They nuked a bunch of work from volunteers without notice in favor of shitty auto translate.

You called…?

Nah, Daleks are actually competent.

Exactly. Imagine intentionally turning down the opportunity to Arrrrr at people.

On the one hand, I enjoyed the first three and would gladly watch a fourth. On the other, there’s no way I’m giving money to this creep. Yo ho ho…

I suppose I should say freedom of relevant information. Things that fall into the net of privacy generally don’t benefit the public to know. I’m focused more on scientific research, software code, things like that. Things the public benefits from the sharing of.

Good question, and a difficult one to answer comprehensively. Generally I’d say if the information is sufficiently dangerous to know, then destroying that knowledge for -everyone- including the original possessor of that knowledge is a reasonable choice. The knowledge of how precisely to make a nuclear bomb is not necessarily going to benefit anyone. But given something where that isn’t an option, such as mapping a virus to attempt to fight it, I’d say the information still should be available.

Mind you, I recognize this is an idealistic viewpoint. But I also recognize I will not be the end arbiter of informational dissemination. I just seek to get us closer to the point where someone else can agonize over these issues.

Ultimate freedom of information. Death to proprietary knowledge.