Does the certificate have a basic constraints extension with CA:TRUE set? Firefox doesn’t allow that for certificates used as ‘end entity’ certificates. You’ll want to re-generate the certificate without the extension.

There is.

deleted by creator

so I can totally ditch chromium/electron

GNOME Web isn’t Chromium-based and does support PWAs, so it might work for your usecase.

Someone I know recently switched from automatic bathroom lights to manual ones. Remembering to turn them on isn’t an issue, but months later everyone still forgets to turn them off.

And .box has been registered as a generic TLD now, so you could run into external .box domains.

They’re not going to have open signups. It’s government agencies only. Not that there’s technically anything stopping Germans from joining the PR departments of our government agencies…

So what you’re saying is that Twitter successfully kept out a bad actor.

It’s a shame that most of the users they have left are also in that category, but hey, they seem to be working on it.

That’s the real AI apocalypse:

• People outsourcing decisions to predictive text because they believe it thinks
• AI hallucinations becoming commonly accepted as truth, as generated articles bury actual knowledge in a flood of bull droppings

You’ll still have the people who are opposed to any telemetry at all, but I think that would do a lot to alleviate the concerns.

A poll like this is never going to be representative, unfortunately.

I’m using kbin Magazine Style Toggle to disable the custom styling on certain magazines, but I had to modify line 36 to make it work:

36c36
<         let style = document.querySelector("head > style:nth-child(22)");
---
>         let style = document.querySelector("head > style:nth-of-type(1)");

As far as I know you can’t set exceptions on mobile Firefox yet. It’s rather annoying.

deleted by creator

On top of this not being at all final yet, there’s nothing stopping you from just not having it enabled (nothing gets sent until you click through the privacy page with the toggle enabled). Could you explain why it’s still such a big deal to you?

It’s not just the upstream for RHEL, it’s also a pretty nice desktop operating system. So as a Fedora user I benefit very directly from Fedora working well. If you’re not a Fedora user, then sure, there’s probably something better that you could do to contribute to the distros you do use.

These are all fine in the US, but in other countries not carrying proof of identity can get you into some trouble, as can refusing to talk to the police. Know your local laws.

Ah, I see. Looks like that should enable people to take individual domains off the list, too, if they want their extensions to work on just some of them.

For Fedora users it changes nothing at all. Fedora is upstream from Enterprise Linux. There’s no practical reason you’d want to switch to a different distribution, just maybe a personal one if you strongly dislike what Red Hat is doing to the RHEL clones.

Is there a list somewhere of these “quarantined” domains?