Evil is willing to lie, cheat, steal, and kill to win. As long as good keeps fighting with one hand tied behind its back, evil will keep gaining ground.
- 0 Posts
- 98 Comments
Argh, can’t downvote this one because the statement is true even though it doesn’t apply to the situation being discussed.
Entrances to gated communities
Shizrak@sh.itjust.workstoPolitical Memes@lemmy.world•Judging by all the downvotes, you'd think they'd get the hint lol
4·11 months agoPlease point to the down voted “moderate” comments.
Shizrak@sh.itjust.worksto
Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.world•[META] Actually Infuriating CommunityEnglish
1·11 months agoNo, I decided that your statement was something a horrible tyrant would say. There’s a difference. I’m guessing you’re actually pretty decent, but wanted to address what I felt was a horrible statement that only an insane person would utter.
Your example is pretty vague, and I can’t say for certain that the user in question was in the wrong, but it at least sounds like you did the right thing.
Initially it sounded like you were banhammering people without them knowing what they did wrong, but at least in this example, you warned the user first, so it seems as though you did right. If it was always like that, my apologies for misinterpreting what you said.
Have a good one.
Shizrak@sh.itjust.worksto
Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.world•[META] Actually Infuriating CommunityEnglish
1·11 months ago::shrugs:: we both agree that the other is the problem. Have fun with your power tripping.
Shizrak@sh.itjust.worksto
Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.world•[META] Actually Infuriating CommunityEnglish
1·11 months agoThe statements
“don’t be afraid to ban somebody just because they didn’t explicitly violate a rule”
And
“Oh, just ban whoever even if they didn’t break any rules”
Use different words but end up in the same place.
So how is it grossly misrepresenting anything?
Perhaps you can give an example of when someone didn’t break any rules and you felt justified banning them and why, and maybe I’ll sympathize a little.
Shizrak@sh.itjust.worksto
Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.world•[META] Actually Infuriating CommunityEnglish
1·11 months agoI mean, I think you sound ridiculous… So agree to disagree there.
Shizrak@sh.itjust.worksto
Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.world•[META] Actually Infuriating CommunityEnglish
1·11 months agoReply to edit:
Nope. Just don’t like petty authoritarians.
Shizrak@sh.itjust.worksto
Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.world•[META] Actually Infuriating CommunityEnglish
1·11 months agoOh, it’s hyperbolic, but it gets the point across.
Shizrak@sh.itjust.worksto
Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.world•[META] Actually Infuriating CommunityEnglish
1·11 months agoOh I’m sure you have a way to justify your corrupt authoritarianism. I don’t care what your reasoning is. If you ban people without them breaking rules, then the only actual rule is “don’t upset the power tripping bastards”, which I strongly disagree with.
Shizrak@sh.itjust.worksto
Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.world•[META] Actually Infuriating CommunityEnglish
1·11 months agoHow is this upvoted so much? This is fucking insane.
“Oh, just ban whoever even if they didn’t break any rules”
Shizrak@sh.itjust.workstoAMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND@lemmy.world•TV weatherlady is fired for describing Elon Musk's Nazi salutes as Nazi salutesEnglish
10·11 months agoWonderful strawman that doesn’t address his point.
Just finished chopping a bunch wood. I don’t get it /s
God forbid people have fun.
When we have protests large enough to get noticed, we get attacked by the police. Why should the protesters have to suffer? Make the oppressors suffer instead.
The first book is phenomenal. The others are good, but not necessarily “must read”
Shizrak@sh.itjust.worksto
Uplifting News@lemmy.world•America Will Be Obsessed With Luigi Mangione for a Long TimeEnglish
8·1 year agoWe need to bring back “No taxation without representation” because rich fucks sure as hell can’t fairly represent the rest of us.






I know that I judge people for wearing them.