hmm I know what u mean, and ur right, but *I dont like the overall-style stuff that much… or rather: not always.

I want… an overakl dress without the overall. no buttons and… weird material… hmm…

butbutbut cant find online— cant find bib-like dress…

ohgosh…

i too have had some like - tests done where they had to insert something and i was just like - so scared it was crazy scary… and painful and stuff… even tho they put some anti-pain stuff in there before actually going in… it was bad. wowie.

i genuinely, still have pain from the parts where they had problems “pushing through”… awful. so iguess thats why i cant see it being fun.

but hey, thank u for sharing ur experience! <3 thats very nice of u.

are u addressing the mythos thing in particular or LM capability in general or umm… “safety” stuff?

the mythos stuff is entirely overblown and that has been proven in many actual usecases by now. its nothing new.

on general capability increase, it… really only matters if u care about it or wanna use those models. if not, its marketing hype. if u do, even in LM spaces the best saying is still “try it urself”

im just yapping now, sorry >~<

ohgosh >v< hehe

imean… who makes a distinction between shorts and tiktok?.. its all the same, no?

HMM I BELIEBE THE IMAGE IS GENERATED AND SOMEONE PUT TEXT OVER IT THEMSELVES! SEEN PLENTY POSTS LIKE THIS WHERE IT WASNT POINZED OUT BY ONYONE BECAUSE THE TEXT SEEMED HUMAN—

ANYWAY, HIW YA DOING BROTHERRR?

chloe! heyhi dear chloe ~

i want her dress.

_{sigh yt shorts…}

i have the same pen. its meh.

ooh, interesting!

thank u for sharing! <3

EDIT: yesyes LMs for therapy are a sad thing ;(

thumb holes!!! >o< aaaaaa

(i luv thumbholes, i need em everywhere—)

yea, its disappointing.

now, i would like to put the blame largely on article sites which just really want some bombaatic headlines, but calling text-predictors output sensational is… quite something.

fair, they really should focus on what’s goin on-

i do wonder tho how one would conduct studies on that?

• theres not really a way to measure mental health… in a meaningful way i think
• companies claiming “we layer off people because of ai” is more marketing than the actual reason (which is - surprise - profit)

the studies conducted so far have largely looked into very short usage patterns, because… its difficult to track, if you are not literally openai.

maybe im missing something here. cuz having some actual studies (besides this popular paper which tried to sell 'u dont learn when generating with LMs" as “LMs cause cognitive debt”) would be really interesting.

wow i can’t wait to do some wealth creation!

(generating slop and making people believe its human work to sell it)

this is a joke. very funny.

yea- it really is just hype marketing.

i dont believe they talked about society, but companies being hacked and for some reason this particular model is just a bit “too good” at finding vulnerabilies in foss that they deemed it too dangerous to be sold to everyone.

… ignoring entirely that this “finding exploits with LMs” is nothing new.

in case anyone is wondering, this comes from this METR graph, showing how, according to their independent testing, models capabilities “double” every half year, as long as you see “capability” as “amount of time it would have taken an expert human to do the same task”.

METR is not some hypey ai company, they conduct rather transparent research on language models. they try to measure actual capability progress in the field.

but, since ai bad: none of this research matters and its all a fluke and the models are benchmaxxed anyway and METR is definitely just a shill-cooperation and so on… sigh

but think of all the money you your boss will save!

is there anything exciting about putting stuff in ur urethra or is that just a scare people type thing?

cuz… i cant imagine that being exciting (yet)

i was so sad not having lemmy ohno >o<

but now its back and thats good…