• 0 Posts
  • 21 Comments
Joined 14 days ago
cake
Cake day: December 25th, 2025

help-circle


  • Did these developers not have experience with AI?

    This is from the article

    But Rush and Becker have shied away from making sweeping claims about what the results of their study mean for the future of AI. For one, the study’s sample was small and non-generalizable, including only a specialized group of people to whom these AI tools were brand new.

    I’m not sure focusing on one aspect to scope a reasonable and doable study automatically makes it “really low effort”.

    You are right, but I believe they should at least have chosen another use case, to make it interesting. I wouldn’t have needed a study to know that an AI performs worse than a developer in a project the developer most likely built them self. The existing project might have some really weird code smells and work arounds that only the developer on the project knows about and understand. There might be relevant context external to the solution. The AI have to be a mind reader in these cases.

    But, if you gave the AI and the developer a blank canvas a clear defined task, I just believe it would be a more interesting study. *

    It kind of sounds like they were just handed a tool they knew nothing about and were asked to perform better with it. A mitter saw is way better and faster than a regular saw, if you know how to use it.

    *edit

    To make my point more clear, I don’t mean the developer needed to solve an issue that’s not related to his daily work, but a task that’s not dependent on years of tech debt or context that is not provided to the AI. And yes, by that, I don’t believe code generation from an AI have a big use case in scenarios where the project have too many dependencies and touches on niche solutions, but you can still use it for other purposes than building features.


  • I get the agenda of the study and I also agree with it, but the study itself, is really low effort.

    Obviously, an experienced developer working on a highly specialized project, where the software developer already have all the needed context, and have no experience with using AI, will beat a clueless AI.

    How would the results look like, if the software developer had experience with AI, and were to start on a new project, without any existing context? A lot different, i would imagine. AI is also not only for code generation. After a year of working as a software developer, I could no longer gain much experience from my senior colleagues (says much more about them, than me or AI) and I kinda was forced to look for sparring elsewhere. I feel like I have been speed running my experience and career, by using AI. I have never used code generation that much, but instead I’ve used it to learn about things i don’t know i don’t know about. That have been an accelerator.

    Today, I’m using code generation much more; when starting a new project, or when i need to prototype something, complete mundane tasks on existing projects, make some none-critical python scripts, get useful bash scripts, spin up internal UI projects, etc…

    Sometimes, i naturally waste time, as it takes time for an AI to produce code, and then it takes time to review the code, but in general I feel my productivity have gained by using AI.







  • Of course, you are right, omnivore. I still get my veggies, haha. My wife never became a vegetarian, and I’m the only vegetarian in our extended family, so I’m minority here and I didn’t really wanted to take the fight. Also, I try to hide the fact that I don’t eat industrial meat, from my kids. I don’t want to influence them in anyway, and if they ever want to become vegetarian, I hope it’s not because of my influence but because of their own reasons, if that makes sense.

    We have an overpopulation of red deer in our local area. I’m buying it from a local estate and they only have the stock they have. If a product is sold out, it’s sold out until the hunting season begins again. I actually don’t mind that in any way. I absolutely hate industrial farming, but I don’t think there’s anything wrong with regulation of wildlife, and it helps in preserving biodiversity.

    Tons of wildlife meat goes to waste each year in my country, and it’s instead used for other purposes, e.g. Fertilizer.

    Besides that, for those who want to eat meat, it’s seems illogical to me, not eating the meat we have at hand before starting to buy meat from industrial farms. I believe it tastes better in every way than what you get from industrial farms.


  • I’ve been vegetarian for almost 10 years, but then I got kids and we didn’t want to make separate dinner each night, so now I also eat wild game, e.g. pheasants, red deer, wild ducks, etc. Am I just a regular carnivore or does there exist a word for my weird ass choice?

    I still haven’t eating any meat from conventional or organic farms for more than 10 years.


  • Gav det noget at læse/høre det på svensk? Og har du en præference mellem dansk, svensk og engelsk? Gad egentlig godt være den type nørd der læser den samme bog på flere sprog, men holder mig egentlig mest til danske oversættelser, når det er skønlitteratur, selvom jeg godt ved det lidt er en skam, når jeg kunne læse de engelske klassikere på engelsk.


  • Senest har jeg læst Mary Shelly - Frankenstein og Jules Verne - verden rundt på 80 dage. Ellers har jeg tidligere læst Orwell, Dostoevsky, Coelho, Steinbeck, Kundera, Bukowski, Jack London, Kierkegaard, Stangerup, Scherfig, Pontoppidan, m.m…

    Jeg kunne forestille mig at hun har købt noget med George Elliot, Dickens, Hardy og måske Vigirnia Wolf og Shakespeare hvis hun er rigtig træls. Håber på at der også er Dumas, Joyce og Homer blandt.


  • Jeg fik 12 indpakkede bøger af mine kone i julegave. Én til hver måned. Til hver bog har hun skrevet en intro hvor hun har skrevet om fx hvad forfatteren er kendt for, tiden bogen er skrevet i, hvis der er en bestemt skrivestil det er værd at være opmærksom på, og andre stilistiske greb, som man måske som lægmand overser i gamle klassikere.

    Jeg har ikke pakket nogle af bøgerne op i endnu, så jeg ser virkelig frem til at komme i gang med det.



  • We try to engage in each other’s interest, even though we have completely different hobbies. My wife is quite spiritual, so when she learns something new, we discuss it and I try to understand it and I challenge the topic and we have a good talk about it.

    My interests are mainly about technical stuff, and she tries to understand what I’m working on.

    But mainly we stare into the void for a good hour after kids are put to bed, and then we discuss practical and mundane boring stuff. But, we insist on being more than roommates that shares responsibilities, so when we aren’t sleep deprived or too overwhelmed by parenthood, we have deep conversations. We also work a lot on our selves. We have high ambitions for our self and what kind of life we want for our family, so we talk about our dreams and how we best realise them.




  • I don’t think it’s all bad in the long run. A higher base load also give higher incentives to install renewable energy. In Denmark we have issues with the cannibalisation effect, i.e. We have reach a point where it’s no longer financially viable to install more renewable assets. We often see negative power prices on windy and sunny days, which forces the renewable asset owners to either turn off their assets during these periods, or pay the negative spot price.