Huh, interesting, when the price was close to 100K I saw roughly eighty-six hundred headlines about it everywhere. But it lost almost half of that and it didn’t make the news? Huh. I wonder how that works.

To ​be included in the S&P 500, a company must be profitable

This is just discrimination. Is S&P scared of innovation? HFSP

Nightmare blunt rotation

I absolutely do get to call everyone who uses LLMs chuds, I actually do it all the time, it’s a great past time that keeps me healthy and moisturised.

No one is shaming him for not maintaining the project, we are, correctly and righteously, shaming him for using the Torment Nexus

So, do you consider active destructive actions to be a proper resistance strategy, @jlink?

Very last comment in this issue - because I’m too stupid to resist the urge.

It’s as much “active destruction” as telling someone to eff themselves.

I can’t actually believe someone would be so cool and put this into their repo, kudos

Chicken entrails

When our enemies are so fucking immoral I have to hand it to the HEAD OF THE CATHOLIC FUCKING CHURCH when the fuck did I enter the twilight zone

All that it tells me is that if you spent the same amount of resources on just fuzzing randomly picked OSS codebases you’d probably get better value for your buck.

If you spend $1.22 for every $1.00 gained, then your operating income is $-0.22. So your income is -22% of your revenue.

Calculating like you do would mean that a -100% operating income margin means you break even, and that’s kinda silly. What would a positive margin mean?

The lower of those numbers is obviously fake. The other is “okay, I guess they’re doing better than I expected, but at least it’s plausible”

Adjusted operating income margin was -122% in the first quarter … That means that for every dollar of revenue the company generated, it lost $1.22

This is so confusing. So is it -122% or is it -22%? Cause -122% should mean that for each dollar gained they lose 2.22 because that’s how percentages work, no?

My assumption based on nothing except life experience is that all of that data gets pushed through differently coloured pipes into the same giant bucket with privacy concerns being “too hard” and “approved by legal”.

When someone offers you a seat on the rocket ship, you do not ask which seat. You just get on.

I’d first check if it’s Musk’s ship for the fear of my life

people are forbidden from using personal plans. Reasoning is cost apparently our monthly Claude bill has become astronomical for the org

How does using personal plans impact the company’s bill? If someone is so profoundly stupid as to spend their own money on a “tool” for their job then why stop them?

idk why but somehow the thing that tickles me most is that they submitted 1.2k files changed as a PR and didn’t even bother to tick the box

can pay an upfront cost to get in good shape, dress well, etc. You do it basically once

Wait what, how can I lock in a good shape with an upfront payment without having to go through this “exercise” bullshit all the time? What does he know that I don’t?! What’s the One Simple Trick, dammit??!!

large language models (LLMs)—but never chatbots

?? Distinction without a difference or am I missing something?

This looks worse than I expected and I am a certified shittalker, that’s crazy

Their cash flow suggests they were heavily leveraged on crypto

Wait what, GitLab was doing crypto? The fuck is going on in those people’s heads