The problem is, this may actually NOT about anti-cheat. Just like, age verification is justified by “child protection”, anti-cheat may be a gateway to gradually take away the control over the kernel.
As some other people said, if they want effective anti-cheat, why not make it server-side? Maybe I worry too much, but the history tells us these companies likely not act in good faith.
In my opinion, the whole article is (AI) slop. It says “AirSnitch” but is actually describing “ARP spoofing”.
Encryption (especially TLS) assumes the underlying transport is insecure. It’s called Transport Layer Security, a secure transport made possible by utilising encryption. It already had considered MitM by design.
I wonder if this change affects Lemmy clients? I use Voyager and it currently works fine.
These are definitely not complex, but that also means it may be too shallow to you. The NPC management is quite straightforward, and they can handle quite a lot.
If I have to point out a problem, for chests with the same priority, NPCs will only seek the nearest chest, which may waste chest slots (multiple chests have the same type of item). In other words, NPCs will not seek a farther chest to try to “finish” a stack. But please bear in mind that I played an version of the game; this may not good true in the current version.
I played this game earlier this year. I’m not sure about the recent development, but for the time I played it, solo was definitely not a problem. You can even recruit NPCs to help you in hoss fights, and these NPCs have a low cooldown on potion consumption. As long as there’s potions, NPCs are unlikely to die. You can even focus on dodging and let NPCs bully bosses. NPCs also help in other perspectives e.g. farming and mining. Its QoL is the best in this genre, in my opinion.
MAKE ARGENTINA GREAT AGAIN!!! 😄😄😄
Actually, some AP articles are pure AI bullshit, for example,
https://apnews.com/article/google-search-antitrust-remedies-chrome-846916fda0943c5fa359385044a02c8b
I definitely would not say AP is bad, but such AI slops really hurt its credibility.
I’m not saying this site is malicious, but I have a feeling that, once this becomes viral and people believe these (existing) links are actually safe, this site may go rogue.
Not sure if relevant. In Mandarin, “1314” sounds like “一生一世” which means “lifetime”.
This clickbait article is so stupid. What’s the point mentioning amd64 cpu manufacturers while the protagonist uses MIPS?
I wonder how the owner of these cats distinguish them; they’re completely identical to me…
While some of the claims may be valid, this article is full of propaganda.
How can Telegram distribute messages in channels with more than tens of thousands users with P2P encryption? If there’s 10k users, should Telegram store the same plain message 10k times simply because there’s 10k public keys? If the sender encrypts and signs the message with 10k public keys, can the sender handle such a resource-hungry task? How can newly joined users decrypt old messages?
Of course there’s fishy things, but the unprofessionalism severely drags down the value of this article.
I wonder if there’s a second part of this video that the thing looks like a remote then controls the thing that looks like a car…