It means that 1976 goes after 1974.

I said “probably” which allows me to bullshit. And the thing I wrote sounds a bit more interesting if it was true.

https://blenderdumbass.org/reviews/the_fifth_element_1997_is_the_most_tragic_film_in_luc_besson_s_career

lol

divorced his much-quoted 16yo 2nd wife after 5 years for a newer model

This is exactly why I think The Fifth Element is tragic. He dumped Le Besco for Jovovich during this movie.

I wonder how this woman you quote all the time feels about that now. With a kid.

I bet Le Besco was pissed right away ( in 1997 ). Imagine it from her perspective. This film director comes into her life, swears love. Marries her. They go through legal bullshit together. And then he dumps her for Milla Jovovich. This gotta suck ass.

Shanna Besson ( their daughter ) was born in 1993. So she was 18 only by about 2011. All that time Besson and Le Besco were trying to continue their “friendliness”. Because they are both the parents of this child. And they needed to fight only a little bit, so they could secure her future.

As soon as Shanna Besson turns 18 though, Maïwenn Le Besco decides to fuck with Besson. She doesn’t need him anymore so she writes and directs a movie about police force called “Polisse” that specifically catch child abuser. I bet Besson really felt the blow. That was probably one of the greatest “fuck you” moments in French cinema.

There is no argument even. You just say it is “wrong” like it has to be self-explanatory.

Let me help you.

In about 99% of cases when children have sexual intercourse it results in PTSD. <-- that is a reason. That is a “why” for calling it “wrong”.

What I argue with Besson and Le Besco ( and with that other girl and her motherfucker ) is that in my opinion those cases seem to be from the remaining 1%.

Before you read this comment, the comment’s writer is known to systematically harass people that have audacity to think of topics such as pedophilia seriously.

Thank you very much. I was fearing that you might not appear. You could also link to my about page on the same website. I tell the same exact story there. Or any of my articles defending the views of Richard Stallman.

Thank you vanth@reddhat.com for taking great interest in what I have to say on the matter. And thank you for your cooperation at promoting said review. And with that, said subject matter.

One of the wildest theories was that based on the 1974 film “Gone in 60 seconds” you can see that Kill Bill volume 1 is Tarantino flips off Jerry Bruckheimer.

I do both. There is like 1 and a half people that read my rambly reviews regularly. That one guy I know of really starts to like my latest few reviews where I come up with wild theories for why the films are the way they are. Like I go and speculate some stuff based on the director’s personal life or the writer’s other work. Or like I had a whole Michael Bay marathon and then a Jerry Bruckheimer marathon. And now I suppose I’m having a Luc Besson marathon. And Luc had enough bad shit crazy stuff in his life, which is gold for wild conspiracy theories. So I keep pumping those.

I enjoy writing them. There is at least one guy that enjoys reading them. So I guess I gonna keep doing it for a while.

I watch way too many movies to think about what I write too deeply. My ritual is: watch a movie, and as quickly as I can dump my feelings about it into a review. My reviews tend to be a little emotional and rambly because of it.

Both Gone in 60 seconds films ( the 1974 and the 2000 )
Crimson Tide
Black Hawk Down
Bronson
2 Machete films
Anna ( the luc besson movie )
Basic Instinct
RoboCop
Hollow Man
Predator
The Long Kiss Goodnight
Once Upon a Time… in Hollywood
The Green Inferno ( Eli Roth’s film )
and One Battle After Another ( in cinema )

So far this was my week. I’m thinking of rewatching Valerian and the City of the Thousand Planets now. Just want some Besson in my brain for some reason.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Emacs!

Pop!_OS / Gnome / systemd / GNU / Linux

Please explain

Let me guess, you got the iWarning? lol