- 12 Posts
- 48 Comments
I liked using Gnome because it was my first introduction to virtual desktops. I am very thankful that it encouraged me to make use of them and to put 1 window per desktop. However, I tried KDE and it turns out that
In a nutshell I liked Gnome because it encouraged me to use KDE in a fun way. The actual thing that made me try KDE was finally getting fed up by their whole “we refuse to implement server side decorations and also a bunch of other basic features/customization stuff middle finger emoji” thing.
1·5 days agoIt’s common for those “other stores” to just be the dev’s own store or a store which takes a smaller cut than Valve.
To me, anyways, it seems perfectly expected for a business to want to pass on Valve’s charges to the customer. Whether this is harmful depends on whether you focus on the player or developer, and whether the developer responds by making the game cheaper everywhere or more expensive everywhere.
I’m not in favor of these practices by Valve either. It seems like the group you’re describing are interpreting this as Valve wont let anyone rip off their customers so you can be sure you’re getting it at the best price there, rather than Valve wont let anyone change the narrative that you’re getting it at the best price there and should buy everything there.
I’ve got 99 problems and 99 problems is at least one of them.
May as well go through the proofs:
First, we need to establish that two infinities are equal in cardinality (aka size) if all their elements can be 1:1 mapped to each other.
So, to go from the reals within [0, 1] and [0, 2], we can multiply by 2. This maps every value within [0, 1] to every value within [0, 2], so these are of the same cardinality.
Where things get interesting is the proof that the reals within [0, 1] are of greater cardinality than every integer.
Say we have an arbitrary mapping from every integer to a real within [0, 1]:
0 -> 0.89236… 1 -> 0.47389… 2 -> 0.84776… 3 -> 0.18790… 4 -> 0.90542… ⋮ ⋱This list contains every integer, but it does not contain every real number because we can always come up with a new one by ensuring at least one digit is different in each existing real:
0 -> …8… ≠ 9 1 -> …7… ≠ 8 2 -> …7… ≠ 8 3 -> …9… ≠ 0 4 -> …2… ≠ 3 ⋮ ⋱ 0.98803… is not within the listTherefore, no 1:1 mapping between the integers and reals exists. Because the limiting factor is the amount of integers, the cardinality of the reals is greater than that of the integers.
Edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cantor’s_diagonal_argument
I recall sitting still for a while at one point and momentarily loosing the ability to make out anything but a patchwork of colors from my vision. It’s fascinating, what the mind’s processing tells us about the world compared to the either low granularity or low field of view provided by each input. I’m pretty sure I was only able to process my peripheral vision during that experience, maybe due to the amount of detail?
I would (probably not literally) wager that by “this” they meant *looks around at entire world*…
this
This is what the refrance: https://stupidtwink.thecomicseries.com/comics/171
That’s one hell of an acronym.
The best habit one can ever develop is to compulsively press the save keybind after every single edit.
Sorry, I was on my phone. Thanks for fixing it, I was a bit confused by your original title considering there’s no linear types in Rust (AFAIK, but there’s a library that sort of does it: https://docs.rs/linear_type/latest/linear_type/).
The title mentions “Linear Haskell” and “Rust-style borrows”.
It tells you how to exit if you press ctrl+C, which is many people’s first instinct.
How about 3 to one light… I wish I understood the psyche the house planner, it’d make for a great thriller novel.
“Triple Toggle: A Story of Terror… and Genius?”
They’re all at different entries to a stairwell so it’s probably the latter.
All I know right now is it’s a fun art style to draw.