Why do you think that?

Das stimmt auf jeden Fall.

“Intelligent” ist in dem Fall mehr Marketing Sprache als Realität, aber diese Zähler können zum Beispiel selbstständig Zählerstände an den Messstellenbetreiber schicken.

Der Zähler hat eine Schnittstelle, mit der du selber deinen eigenen Verbrauch auslesen kannst oder um einen sogenannten Zeitvariablen Tarif zu nutzen, bei dem dein Strompreis sich an dem Preis an der Strombörse orientieren soll.

Gibt dir das einen ersten Eindruck?

Grundsätzlich sollte es bei einer Nachzahlung und höheren Abschlägen bleiben.

Je nachdem wie hoch dein zukünftiger Jahresverbrauch ist, kann es aber durchaus sein, das auch der Zähler ausgetauscht wird, denn ab 6000 kWh/Jahr ist der Einbau von einem intelligenten Messsystem verpflichtend. Intelligente Messsystem kosten etwas mehr pro Jahr, aber das sollte am Ende nicht zu sehr ins Gewicht fallen.

Thank you for this idea. I wasn’t aware, that you can subscribe to an rss feed for releases on gitlab/github.

I think that I will follow your approach.

I was able to add a email address as an additional ID for wero, maybe your bank allows that as well.

I’m not 100% on the paths regarding the mounts and where the containing files are accessible, but it looks correct to at the moment. One way to test this is to check if the user you are using to run the Jellyfin container is able to access the files without additional input/steps.

If your user can access it, then Jellyfin will be able to do that as well as soon as you have mounted it in the container.

The drive will be mounted by the host and you can use that to also decrypt it. This way Jellyfin in the docker container doesn’t know that the media is stored on an encrypted hard drive.

Grief doesn’t need a time limit, but if you wanted to stop grieving and you couldn’t, then I would say that you were grieving too long in the end.

Deciding on how to assign the damage without the defending player being able to intervene seems okay to me, but I am really confused why they removed the requirement to assign lethal damage.

But maybe I have, you know … plans and would rather deal 3 damage to the 6/6 and 2 damage to the 4/4. That’s okay, too.

This really feels unnecessary to me.

Terms of Service; Didn’t read does that, but I don‘t know if it is the one that was shared previously.

This response is so true and so sad.

This is a really disturbing comic.

Sythis is a safe bet when it comes to an enchantress commander.

Calix is a good card for the 99 for sythis, but you can also always use him as the commander.

One that I haven’t played myself, but that takes a different approach to an enchantress commander is Eriette.