Mich verletzt die Grammatik in deinem Kommentar, löschst du den deswegen jetzt auch oder was?

Ich kann verstehen, dass ein Begriff traumatisieren kann, aber die Lösung ist auch dafür nicht das Verbot des Begriffs aus der Öffentlichkeit sondern Therapie für den/die Betroffene/n.

Die Zensur eines Wortes ist, meiner Meinung und Erfahrung nach, nichts weiter als hohle Symbolpolitik die keinerlei Einfluss auf die alltägliche Realität der Betroffenen hat. Rassisten werden bei “Verbot” eines Wortes sich entweder gar nicht daran halten, oder ein alternatives Wort finden, welchem sie dann die genau gleichen negativen Konnotationen auflegen wie dem ursprünglichen Wort (siehe die abwertende Verwendung von “colored” im Englischen, die effektiv das N-Wort fast vollumfänglich ersetzt hat). Im Resultat steht der Wortschatz also mit einem Wort weniger da, ohne den Rassismus effektiv bekämpft zu haben.

Ich würde sogar soweit gehen zu sagen, dass viele die Zensur der Wörter fordern dies nur tun, um sich nicht mit wirklich tiefer gehend mit Rassismus beschäftigen zu müssen, sondern um bequem sagen zu können “Das Wort [xyz] wird nicht mehr verwendet, es gibt keinen Rassismus mehr”.

Ja, aber die Anhörung ist wenigstens bindend, das hat man bei anderen Platformen nicht

Naja da gibt’s jetzt die einfache Erklärung, dass die offiziellen Petitionsseiten einfach nicht so bekannt sind und Petitionssteller dies dadurch nicht benutzen.

Und dann gibt es die Aluhut Erklärung, dass solche Petitionen frühzeitig von der betroffenen Seite auf nicht bindenden Seiten in Umlauf gebracht werden um eventuell später eingereichten Petitionen auf bindenden Seiten Wind zu nehmen.

Gluabe das ist 99% der Zeit ersteres aber komisch ist es trotzdem irgendwie

Introducing: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/gg/art_10.html

Guarantees secret postal- and remote (original intent: radio) communications which applies to the internet ever since they thought they could make a quick buck by demanding radio broadcasting fees from youtubers, by which they placed the entire internet in the domain of radio laws.

Forget other EU countries and laws, the German constitution guarantees private postal and remote communications for every citizen. It’s also why Germany has historically never (that I know of) voted in favor of this bullshit: it violates the Briefgeheimnis (article 10 of the German constitution)

If they hadn’t rejected it the federal constitutional court in Karlsruhe would have sacked every single proposal on how to implement it, a process our current coalition is very familiar with from multiple attempts at trying to push preemptive collection of unencrypted data. They knew it wouldn’t pass here anyway and likely just waited on an opportune time to profit off the inevitable denial. Although I’ll give them that: some parts of the coalition were rather eager to meet the judges in Karlsruhe again anyway so it wasn’t a 100% guaranteed rejection either.

I’m just using AI to get me the damn standard library function I want to use but can’t remember. Way faster than clicking through a couple links of a search result for it.

Misunderstanding of the century about to cause some serious damage.
Our guy could have worded that a lot better than he did, guess we’ll see Urumin spiral for a good bit.

The only shocking thing about this is Google admitting to it

In this Episode: Urumin learns where all of her merch share comes from and just how much of a fan Kimiya is

Also peak hair tie usage

This isn’t going to affect Intel usage in the near future.

True, it won’t significantly shift the downtrend Intel is experiencing but it’s one more reason why that downtrend exists. Corporations are already switching over to AMD’s EPYC for their server platforms and Intel is as entrenched as ever in the Laptop side of corporate business (which runs Windows anyway)

Companies generally buy whatever is cheap and available

Not quite true, they buy what makes them the most money for the cheapest price and due to that context Intel has been on the way out for a while now.

Dell, HP, etc rarely offer AMD as an option.

While there are a lot more systems available with an Intel chip saying they rarely offer AMD is stretching it a bit. Dell has listing for 51 Intel and 12 AMD laptop options, HP ~190 Intel and ~90 AMD, there is an imbalance there but if you are a corporate customer looking for something you will find an AMD alternative there. And in the server space Intel has been/is being gradually reduced to the second choice option with AMD EPYC being chosen for the premium products.

And this is just ancillary Linux drivers, not a major make or break component.

Might be ancillary to you and me but to a corporation this is a piece of liability they now would take on when buying new Intel CPUs for servers. Not by a lot but likely by enough to upsell them to the product using AMD instead.

Realistically lt will lead to enterprises using AMD instead, Windows just simply isn’t even an option for many enterprise uses (mainly server applications)

Nah the pendulum is swinging too far into the other direction, especially since there is no betterment in sight. Intel royally shat the bed ever since Zen released and we are now at a point where their lack of a real answer to that is starting to enable the same monopolistic behaviour Intel displayed in AMD

Also of note is that the dirtier factories here are still sparkling clean compared to those elsewhere so by removing this tax for exports the overall energy bill for heavy industry should see an improvement as more is sourced from relatively cleaner European factories

Blatant corruption, party politics and a decoupling of the politicians from reality to an absurd degree

Edit: no offense taken btw, our politics are a shit show

Yes that is definitely the problem, let’s ignore the structural issues that cause industry to be less competitive or the widening gap between manager and worker compensation, surely those lazy fucks are just not working enough /s

It’s very clear though that a major driving force behind this absolute farce of a deal was the German CDU, our chancellor even congratulated on the deal before he noticed the extremely negative public sentiment against this deal. I worry that our current coalition has their heads stuck up too far in the clouds to fix or address any of the issues we currently have and act in the best long term interest of Germany and Europe, bowing down to Trump might be the “better” solution short term but it makes absolutely no sense for the long term. Especially with the tacked on military package, that’s just an incredibly obvious trap they fell for.

In typical fashion they’re trying to put a bandaid on a rotten limb. By trying to delay the inevitable crisis they are ensuring it will hit us worse.

Isn’t part/most of this that Europe simply exported the carbon-intensive stuff abroad?

Partially true however it is also worth pointing out that industry in the EU produces significantly fewer emissions than the same industries outside the EU. The costs that come with that are largely why industry is outsourcing elsewhere, there is no coordinated effort by some shadow council to export the carbon-intensive industries abroad, just not fully thought out economic policy (producing in the EU causes costs for emissions, importing doesn’t/is easier to fudge, the incentive created by this imbalance is easy to see).

I feel like most people say they don’t care about boob size but really want to say they don’t care about boob size, so long as they are within the “normal” range of “not nearly nothing” and “not a planet yet”