They are known for guilt-tripping and trying to gaslight/manipulate mods/admins once they get banned from places, so be ready for that.

Give even one example.

like they’ve done in this thread

You saying someone is me doesn’t make them me.

Then you’ll consider it a good thing that this is a slanderer you are responding to and that not everything is as they seem when it comes to them.

Never after registering have I ever violated the instance’s rules. Some of what they’re saying is out of context while some misinterprets things to seem wrong, and none of it happened in the instance itself, the admins of which have spoken to me as seeing through the majority of what is being said.

That it’s a dub and not a sub.

I fear that, one day, the wrong people are going to find out I cheated on my finals in order to graduate, which does have consequences.

Spaceballs.

You’re welcome :)

You say that like showcasing one admin’s actions (one of the dbzer0 ones no less) is sufficient as appeal to the masses, or that appeal to the masses is an excuse to defend people who have literally been stirring things up by accusing the other side of stirring things up.

I could do it for you, and then promote you.

Only the third and fourth one are of me in any way (not sure what relevance anything Mastodon-related would have though), and I have never claimed otherwise. They might as well have included those to make the rest seem genuine. But it isn’t. Nobody else is related to me in any way, save for the fact we are being dragged into the same issues (case in point).

Anything Star Wars except Clone Wars and Rebels.

Happy anniversary!

Was it a Roman-themed wedding?

If you or anyone would just see what the OP has to say, they’d see that the whole point of what they’re saying is that, one, they’re not related to me, and two, that even the few things you are right about happened a long time ago outside the bounds of the local TOS and in circumstances which (at this time) have been reconciled.

We discussed all of that earlier in response to when it was last parroted, with much of the charges being cleared already in both private discussions with admins and in public, with you just parroting at this point. Even what you’re responding to touches upon that, but I doubt you hear what people have to say before trying to leech your slander onto what they’re saying.

The part about my transphobia has been discussed and I was cleared of that first; it would be your turn to answer for your own, considering what the person you’re responding to has to say.

We spoke of the stuff I said in the art community, and those whom I’ve spoken to about it don’t consider it as personality-defining as you claim considering its setting, considering the time, place, and circumstances they took place in.

We are about to talk about the claims of me promoting illegal material, which I wasn’t doing in that image (what I was doing was defending someone from claims that the person I was speaking to was going to call the authorities on them, which in their country does not apply to “drawn” material).

We did not discuss the so-called “Nazi apologia” or what you claim is impersonation, perhaps because it’s a meta-perspective in the former’s case (you don’t know German law/culture/history at all if you are going to try to hammer that point out of spite).

We are literally settling this as you speak and are at the negotiating table (whether or not I feel it should be a matter we must bring to said table). Meanwhile you are spamming the process by continuing to take anything I’ve ever said, whether recent and within a decade’s range, and trying to spin it. Most places would unban those who have been banned as long ago as you are pulling things from. Can you say “stalker”?

Of note, the anon is not me; not every anon is me (are we forgetting this is the same community whose rule enforcers often say they can only take guesses about who people are), and I was telling that anon I’d check with the admins elsewhere about that rumor.

Your witch hunting wherever anyone you dislike steps foot is getting ridiculous, especially considering your history and especially considering several people, including high ranking people, low ranking people, and senior members, have been accused of being me so far, including people like Candyman337 who is well-known as someone who helps out in the groups. Though there will be varying degrees in the validity people think you have, an increasing number of us are beginning to see your slander campaign for what it is.

The people you bring up towards the end aren’t even me, and never have I claimed they are me (and one of them just parrots what you are saying here). People shouldn’t have to tell you when something is excessive like this. Leave us alone!

I can’t remember ever buying balloons.

Hypothetically, supposing I proved my innocence, would you unban me?

As I previously said (but which will probably be ignored, because of how easy it is to lie about something that’s literally in front of people), admins ask for multiple names to work in coordination in rule enforcing depending on the instance. You say all that like I make it a secret who my secondary names are (which your own proofs prove isn’t the case).

If that’s what you’re saying, more is going on behind the scenes than you think. I’m still a proud community contributor if that’s what you’re getting at.

Not what I said. I am saying it should be up to businesses if they want to yield to that. It strikes me as entitled to say granting the money during their leave is the only acceptable way of going about it. But excuse me for seeing that someone asked what I think of paternity leave and not answering how they might’ve wanted.