This is especially bad when you are the administrator.

People just don’t read. Especially error messages.

The worst is error messages that don’t say anything at all besides oopsie woopsie 🤦

There are many people who have to bathe sitting down (e.g. the elderly). Something like the device mentioned in the article would be useful for such people, especially if mobility issues make it difficult for them to clean themselves.

Interesting, but I think this is largely discredited from the brief research I did?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archaeoacoustics#Discredited_theories

Cool idea nonetheless.

Sabotage is in quotes because they are directly quoting someone. It’s not a euphemism.

Which SCP is this referencing?

I’ll be the first to say it’s not an inherently sexual thing, but I agree it’s a weird suggestion.

Going to any interest group meeting when you aren’t actually interested in the topic is kind of weird.

Makes sense, thanks!

Can anyone ELI5 how we are able to release new standards all the time? Are there technological advances that allow more bandwidth? If not, why not start with higher bandwidth?

🥵

Plumbers, electricians, homebuilders, sanitation workers, and electrical workers. Who’d I miss?

Thank you all for a fine poopie.

There are at least 37 of us. Unless a bot posted this…

Valentine’s day release?! Senpai is finally getting a kiss 😘

Nice, thanks.

Who is this guy? That’s not Ned Stark lol

I won’t claim to like this film, but it certainly is a Thankskilling Thanksgiving classic.

Where was Gondor when the Westfold fell?

I’ve used y’all intentionally as a gender neutral term for years in the south.

Lately I’ve even seen “y’all means all” used as a pride slogan in the south.

While I disagree with OP, that kind of information isn’t classified. It’s personally identifiable information which is restricted and secured, but it’s not classified in the same sense as the person who leaked on discord.

In response to op, there are plenty of legitimate reasons to classify information that are not nefarious. For example, a diagram explaining the security systems for a building. It’s better to restrict access to that document so it is less likely for an adversary to see the details, because all that would really do is enable them to identify weaknesses which they could exploit. Generally this sort of thing is called operational security and I think it is actually the basis for the US government’s mandatory access control in the first place (e.g. “loose lips sink ships”).

Isn’t this the whole point of tenure? To protect academic freedom?