For the people who have not yet decided on a search engine. The most EU way you can go is Ecosia or Qwant as they are building their own search index.

Ecosia is my personal pick as its also aimed at planting trees and they have quite a good browser alongside it.

  • Extrawurst@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    10 months ago

    Great! Ecosia works super well, and it feels good to not having to rely on google to find things. Only thing I’d wish for is that they’d have some map service or similar to find restaurants and shop. There is sadly no good replacement for google maps that I’ve found

    • FarraigePlaisteaċ (sé/é)@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      10 months ago

      Ecosia works well enough for me too. The tree planting thing should never be forgotten. The scope of their work is impressive and they’re very transparent about their goals and funding. No other search engine comes close to that.

        • FarraigePlaisteaċ (sé/é)@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          10 months ago

          200 million trees. Far from greenwashing.

          Folks, critical thinking is more important than ever these days. Making conclusions based on a brain fart - when we have the internet at our fingertips - is partly why the world is the way it is.

        • Teppichbrand@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          10 months ago

          I listened to a podcast a couple years ago. The founder talked about how he made sure that Ecosia can not be sold and monetized, he himself is not making much money from it. My english is not good enough to explain it in more detail. :)
          I see greenwashing everywhere, but as far as I can tell from the podcast and their YouTube, this is legit.

      • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah but open street maps does not handle temporary road closures, construction, or temporary one-ways well…

        https://nelsonslog.wordpress.com/2024/03/30/openstreetmap-temporary-road-closures/

        I don’t even know if organic maps respects tags. https://www.reddit.com/r/openstreetmap/comments/vuuecd/how_or_where_can_i_submit_temporary_closed_roads/

        It certainly doesn’t respect road conditions or road priority. It constantly tries to send me through a 2 meter wide cobblestone and broken up asphalt service road instead of the main residential roads because it “technically” is 50, even with surface marked as bad condition.

        I try to contribute to OSM where I can, but i never can trust organic maps to get me somewhere I haven’t been before.

        • noodle (he/him)@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          open street maps does not handle temporary road closures, construction, or temporary one-ways well

          that sadly depends on your region and the amount of volunteers in your area. I remember reading how OSM was more reliable after the 2023 Turkey earthquake for the first responders than Google Maps, because the changes in the terrain were added there much faster.

          I don’t know about the road conditions during the navigation. it definitely does support this kind of data as I input it myself every now and then, but I don’t drive so I haven’t had to try out different OSM navigation algorithms to see if they account for it, or anything like that.

          • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            I more mean the actual method of doing it isn’t straightforward and there is still no fully agreed upon and documented method for construction changes, just a few “you can do it this way” kind of things.

            And indeed navigation picking up the OSM updates and using temporary closure tags and road conditions seems to be more miss than hit with organic maps at least. But the UI is 10x more usable than OSMAnd so I use it where possible.

    • da_cow (she/her)@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      You could also use open street maps. For mobile I recommend using Organic Maps.l Only problem is, that the search isn’t that good.

    • Kualdir@feddit.nlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Its already been mentioned but if you don’t need reviews you can use Here WeGo maps. Its a good alternative and with more users (who make fixes if something is missing) it’ll get better and better

    • Rene Raggl 🇪🇺 🇺🇦@mastodon.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      @Extrawurst @Kualdir For Navigation alone, I find Magic Earth (which uses OSM] to be a perfectly fine replacement, that even offers some features Gmaps hasn’t. Like being able to download whole countries for offline navigation, Driver Assistance etc.

      For the reviews… That’s more difficult. https://lib.reviews/ is one attempt, but it has nowhere near the dataset (duh) and the reviews are not directly visible on the map.

    • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      i mean you kinda need to specify what you want from a map, there are a bunch of things that google maps is actively the worst at

      • Extrawurst@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        For sure, one specific thing is being able to find a restaurant in the vicinity, seeing some kind of review system of its reception, and knowing if it’s open or not and having a link to a menu or its homepage. Another (albeit extremely specific) case is looking up a secondhand store in the vicinity of where I am - I tried this with here wego when I was out recently but it showed me a store that no longer existed. Of course might be a unlucky coincidence (google maps for sure has nonexisting stores too), but I’m 0 for 1 atm.

        • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          best alternative would probably be something like tripadvisor, for restaurants

          obviously it’s not exactly a vastly less shitty option, but at least it’s not google.

  • FundMECFS
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    10 months ago

    We will develop a privacy-first search index, which will be used by both Ecosia and Qwant, and unlike proprietary solutions, we are making the index available to others.

  • Phytobus@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    10 months ago

    Both are great! In my experience Qwant gives better search results, so thats what i use. I even prefer Qwant’s results over Google’s. But Ecosia is a great option as well because of the tree planting.

    • Kualdir@feddit.nlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      I use Ecosia for personal use and Qwant for work. So I support both!

      Ecosia is my personal choice because of the tree planting as well. But I agree Qwant results are a bit better, which for me only matters while I work.

    • Kualdir@feddit.nlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      France and Germany will have it this year, we’ll have to see how it evolves further but hopefully its a success!

  • ClusterBomb
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    10 months ago

    So many people are happy here. I can understand why but quick reminder that Qwant is not privacy friendly like they claim to be and that the CEO is a bastard who threatened employees.

    As for Ecosia, the only green they have is their name. Great they plant trees but they pushed AI so it’s basically like if they are destroying the trees they planted.

    There is a search engine with their own index from UK, privacy-friendly, it is called Mojeek. It is not as good as the others but I’ve been using it for maybe 4 months and it already improved a lot. They need users to give feedback and improve. Give it a try ! 😊

    • AkashicOwl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      I don’t know how far in the rabbithole I am, but at this point I feel like it’s nearly impossible to find a company that doesn’t have dirt on it in one way or another. There are alternatives in some domains, but for search engines, it’s really narrowed down to Brave (which also have some not very nice people in it) and Duck duck go, which uses Bing. Which is basically pointless to me, not even talking about using UE products, for me, the best way to get some fresh air is to have companies that have their own search engines (so, not Bing or Google, this is why I don’t use alternatives like Starpage or Searx) There’s Mojeek, yes, but last time I used it, it was…really bad. I still encourage them tho! I’ll give it another shot now.

      • ClusterBomb
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        To me there is also a topic no one is ready to talk about : the way we search the web. I changed the way I search the web. Most of the time I need to browse the same websites so I added keywords search for those search.

        For Mojeek, I took time configuring “focuses” (a feature they have to limit the websites searched to a predefined subset).

        I reduced my need of search engines globally and now I’d say I use Mojeek and there’s 50% chance I need to go to DuckDuckGo because Mojeek failed to give me my answers. When I started using Mojeek, I almost never found answers so I’d say it got better!

        Google always suck for me except if I’m looking for products, the only domaineit shines but that’s kinda expected to be honest considering Google business model.

    • coen@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      I get your point regarding AI and Ecosia, but this is a personal choice whether to use AI or not. I don’t think it really negates the good they are trying to do. And I expect we’ll see some breakthroughs regarding AI efficiency in the near future.

  • atro_city@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    10 months ago

    It doesn’t mention whether it’ll be opensource or not. A proprietary search index that isn’t USAian is probably better, but still opensource would be better.

    • Kualdir@feddit.nlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      10 months ago

      Don’t let perfect stand in the way of better I’d say, in the end both companies still need to make a return on investment

      • NewDay@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        10 months ago

        1H for Qwant and its indexing of French websites. 2H for Exosia and its indexing of German websites.

        The index is expected to start serving France-based search engine traffic for Ecosia and Qwant by the first quarter of next year. It will then expand to include a “significant portion” of traffic in Germany by the end of 2025. English would be the third language they’d look to add, the pair said, adding that more European languages could follow in the future if momentum builds.

        https://techcrunch.com/2024/11/11/ecosia-and-qwant-two-european-search-engines-join-forces-on-building-an-index-to-shrink-reliance-on-big-tech/

              • Flamekebab@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                10 months ago

                I’m pushing 40, have a mind like a steel trap for phrases and terms that crop up in pop culture, and have a business degree. I have never heard “H1” or “H2” before, let alone “1H”. To me that suggests that it’s not a common term in British or American English and instead is common in another language. Kind of like Swedes and numbering the weeks of the year (perhaps the other Scandinavian countries do it too), or the various languages that interpret “half one” as meaning halfway to one (i.e. 1230) rather than half past (1330).

                Of course it could just be a bizarre blindspot and it’s passed me by but damnit, I’m curious now!

                • Microw@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  I think it is a central European thing where we used to structure the business year into two halfs - erstes Halbjahr and zweites Halbjahr - in regards to reports etc while the anglosphere has tended to structure it into quarters. And it’s still done for things like release dates. But don’t quote me on that, as I have no sources.

        • CPTN Cosmo@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          1-handed (as opposed to 2-handed) which means you can wield two 1H but only one 2H. Usually 2H has the higher damage dice, while 2 1H allows for two attacks in one turn instead (which means either slightly increased base dmg or flexibility of attacking multiple targets) ;)

  • bearboiblake@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    10 months ago

    Search engines are dying, I doubt they’ll have much relevance in ten years or so, unless something radically changes. Walled gardens, SEO, AI spam, and so on.

    I wonder where the solution lies. The way the modern internet works is completely hostile to the idea of crawler-based search engines, so I feel like the focus should be on creating an alternative, people-first internet which is completely hostile to brands, corporations and advertisers, ran by communities and individuals, etc.

    • BetterNotBigger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      Far from it, if you’re willing to pay for good search check out Kagi. You don’t realize how busted search is until you see what it’s like when ads aren’t the business model.

      • bearboiblake@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’ve been a paying subscriber to Kagi since 2023. Everything I wrote in my previous comment is still true. I’m glad that it works for you, though.

  • mattc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 months ago

    Sounds great! I’ve been happy with Ecosia currently. I tried Qwant, but I have strict privacy settings enabled in my browser and it says it couldn’t get a secure connection. I’m sure it’s 100% safe, but I just settled for Ecosia for now. Looking forward to trying out their new partnered search engine.

    • Kualdir@feddit.nlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      I personally never really liked duckduckgo. I’d say Qwant is the better one of the two in terms of results (I use it for work) but for personal use I choose Ecosia for the environmental impact, the results are getting better but not on Qwants level yet

  • madjo@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 months ago

    Now if only anyone of them would offer a paid ad-free option. I’d drop Kagi in an instant

    • Kualdir@feddit.nlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Startpage is also majorly American owned, so good to step away from it!