• SharkEatingBreakfast@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    10 months ago

    Let’s be real: they’re terrified that they might be forced to be near poor people, minorities, gays, and mentally ill folk.

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      10 months ago

      Bingo. I’ve talked to many of them online and it always boils down to this. It’s never that they’re actually in any danger. It’s just they feel scared. They drive their big trucks because it makes them feel safe.

      Meanwhile puny me rides the subway daily.

      • SharkEatingBreakfast@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        10 months ago

        They’re weak, scared, and pathetic. Too xenophobic to interact with anyone or anything outside their coddled circles that might make them feel “”“uncomfortable”“”.

      • Katana314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        Might surprise you, but on feeling scared: I once heard that a slim majority of SUV drivers were women. In some ways it makes sense - if they’d normally be vulnerable walking the streets alone, a less vulnerable vehicle gives them a feeling of safety.

      • Angry_Autist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        That’s nice, no medication I’ve found yet lets me ride public transportation without constantly freaking out from human proximity but I bet it is just so pleasant to have a normal brain

    • Angry_Autist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      or they could be, like me, mentally ill folk who really cannot handle being forced to be around other people

      But generalizations are fun aren’t they!

    • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Their “News tm” is constantly telling them cities are hellholes full of junkies and murderers and murderous junkies.

      Most of them have no clue how the world outside their pickup truck windows works.

  • Dagwood222@lemm.eeBanned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’ve done both.

    Safest place in the subway is at the front of the first car near the motorman. Second best is the front of the second car. If there’s trouble you can move to the first car [with the motorman easily] and have two doors between you and the troublemaker.

    • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      89
      ·
      10 months ago

      Public transport is directly correlated with ridership numbers. When using public transport is the best mobility option, then everyone from all backgrounds will use it and that leads to less bullshit being done.

      The numbers are pretty early but the congestion pricing in NYC has apparently already led to less crime in the subway.

      The latest Climate Town vid is great.

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      10 months ago

      You also shouldn’t use your phone if you’re right near the doors. It’s too easy for someone to grab it and exit the car as the doors close.

          • Soup@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            10 months ago

            Ya’ll have a bathroom on your light rail? Are we still talking about simple metro systems are is that not a full-blown “train”(I put it quotes because they’re all trains, but you get the idea).

            • FundMECFSOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              10 months ago

              It’s like halfway between a train and a tram and it goes partially underground.

              I think light rail is the right name?

              • Soup@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                10 months ago

                To me, a light-rail is something that operate within a municipality. Like, it’s for commuting and isn’t too intense, but differs from a subway because it is not strictly underground. Having a bathroom in a light-rail setup would be like having one on a metro whereas having a bathroom on an inter-city train makes a whole lot more sense.

            • Ziglin (it/they)@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              The only trains I’ve been on with both were inter city trains but regional trains usually have bathrooms too. It’s just the subways and similar that haven’t had bathrooms in my experience.

        • rocket_dragon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          10 months ago

          It’s really sad, but for perspective, take that crime of theft, multiple it by tens of thousands up to millions of times larger, and you have the CEO’s, the oligarchs, the billionaires, the POTUS.

          We know how to fix this - it starts with holding their biggest crooks accountable, then making sure everyone has their basic needs met, social trust gets restored as people are no longer desperate.

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          It is sad. It wasn’t always like this. When I was growing up I could walk anywhere as a kid and every adult on the block had their eye on me. A lot has changed in NYC in 40 years.

          • mriormro@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            My brother in Christ, NYC was fucking wild in the 80’s. How are you even comparing?

            • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              It was, but neighbors were more aware and vigilant. People spent more time outside in the streets in residential areas, and knew their neighbors. I remember walking with my sister to get Italian ices when I was no more than 10 years old, and every other building had neighbors out front waving hello. We also couldn’t do anything we shouldn’t be doing without someone yelling from across the way. Now the same neighborhood seems lifeless and desolate. People just stay inside and mind their own. It’s just not as communal as it used to be.

              • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                You should read “Death and Life of Great American Cities” by Jane Jacobs, because it talks about this. Basically, having more people on the sidewalk makes for healthier, safer, neighborhoods. Having everyone drive instead of walking is really bad for pretty much every metric we care about- safety, the environment, economic activity.

  • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    10 months ago

    Driving is the highest-risk activity that the average person engages in on the average day.

    It’s dangerous, stressful, time-consuming, and expensive. I also think it is a significant contributing factor to our sedentary lifestyles and expanding waistlines. I’m resentful that the decision to go with automobile-based infrastructure was decided before I was even born and that I’ve never had a viable opportunity to vote against it.

    What I really hate is that driving is a privilege. But not needing to drive (i.e. walkability, bikeability, and good transit) are also privileges. Fucked either way it would seem.

    • bluewing@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      10 months ago

      There never was a vote to make it legal or illegal. And it was widely hailed as a great idea at the time. It was considered the best way for large cities to dig out from under the literal mountains of horse shit they were drowning in and that was polluting the ground water and killing children and adults alike from disease. Plus it gave people far more freedom to move about faster and father than they had by foot, horse, or train. Like it or not, the internal combustion engine has given you, personally, everything good and bad that you have at this very moment in time.

      But, like most great human ideas, there are always unintended consequences no one sees until they happen.

      • AppleTea@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        Actually, there was a lot of push-back. People weren’t too happy that suddenly great big hunks of metal were hurling through public spaces at lethal speeds – but the car manufactures had money, so the press and the politicians sided with them.

        check out Fighting Traffic: The Dawn of the Motor Age in the American City by Peter D. Norton

      • trilobyte81@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Sure but now it is holding us back we need a nationwide high speed train network we are stuck in the 1930s while lots of other countries are in the 2030s

    • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      I actually like driving for the most part, and I think that I’d like it even more if people who weren’t forced to drive weren’t driving, and if the people driving were well-trained and medically cleared as safe to drive.

      If we had those things I could do a hundred miles an hour on the highway everywhere. It would be awesome.

      • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 months ago

        I think that I’d like it even more if people who weren’t forced to drive weren’t driving,

        I actually don’t mind driving so much as I mind driving in heavy traffic. Driving along on an empty road, or lighter traffic at least, isn’t so bad.

        But society pretty much forces everyone to drive. Even people who don’t want to drive or are simply bad at it.

        • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 months ago

          Now imagine if everyone you met on those low-traffic days knew how to zipper merge, and were intimately familiar with the idea of “keep right, pass left.” And their cars had to be maintained perfectly to even be on the road.

          This training and maintenance is why some sections of the Autobahn have no speed limit.

    • cmhe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      The average person only owns a fraction of a car, but I do believe that existing on a street either inside or around cars is the highest risk an average person is being subjected to on an average day.

      Keep in mind that only a small number of privileged people own a car, but everyone has to deal with them and are subjected to their risks.

    • LaserRunRaccoon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Being a pedestrian in proximity to a driver might be riskier, unfortunately. Most driving safety standards - including vehicle and infrastructure standards too - do not adequately protect people outside of vehicles.

      • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        It’s the reason I don’t bike, even though distances are reasonable. I consider using an unprotected bike lane next to a busy 45mph stroad to be a matter of when (not “if”) I’m involved in a collision that could cause serious injury or even a fatality. All it takes is one driver with their face in their phone.

  • Not_mikey@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    10 months ago

    but there’s crazy people on the subway

    You don’t think there’s crazy people on the highway? And on the highway they’re controlling a 2 ton killing machine in a sometimes stressful situation.

    I’ll take the crazy guy yelling in the corner of the subway then see what he’s like behind the wheel of one of those huge pickup trucks during traffic.

    • mao@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yeah like what the fuck? Every time I drive on a highway I encounter at least one potential life-ending moment, where if I hit the breaks one second too late I’ll die. This is absolutely a trillion times worse than the slim chance of getting a subway car lit on fire lol

      • Auli@lemmy.caBanned
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        Then you are not giving the proper distance. If you experience this every time you drive you are probably the problem.

        • LaserRunRaccoon@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          If you can’t conceive of a situation where you need to slam the brakes due to external factors despite following the recommended 2-second following distance, you’re ignorant of the depths of bad driving. Have you really never been cut off before?

          I would go so far as to say that if you’re not noticing at least a single example of dangerous driving nearly every time you leave the house, you’re probably not aware enough to be a safe driver.

          • Emerald (she/her)@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            I would go so far as to say that if you’re not noticing at least a single example of dangerous driving nearly every time you leave the house

            Dangerous driving, not slam the brakes every time lol

        • mao@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Nah crazy surprise merges have nothing to do with keeping a proper distance. But maybe Canadians have better driving manners ;)

      • Emerald (she/her)@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Every time I drive on a highway I encounter at least one potential life-ending moment, where if I hit the breaks one second too late I’ll die

        What highway is this?

    • Ziglin (it/they)@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’m with you but driver’s licenses are meant to help weed those out. I think they are likely rarer but not uncommon.

  • boolean_sledgehammer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    10 months ago

    Conservative men are terrified of everything. Perpetual fear and petty grievances are the cornerstones of the entire conservative ethos.

  • gt5@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    10 months ago

    I ride the subway all the time and haven’t been murdered yet. AMA

  • PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’m more terrified of driving a car in a city than on a highway. In a city one small mistake can mean killing a child or something. On the highway I can go at a moderate speed in the right lane without distractions.

    Either way I prefer rails tho

    • Wanpieserino@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      Already afraid of this on an e bike.

      Saw a mom walking on the road (next to a perfectly available sidewalk) with her small child following her 2 meters behind her.

      Fucking hell if that kid randomly ran to my side, I would have hit her.

      I hate this shit so much

      • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        I saw a car hit a teenager on a bike the other day. Dragged the kid a bit and then just sped off.

        Somehow the kid seemed fine. Got up and rode off after a moment.

        This was in Brooklyn, by Barclays center (a very crowded spot). Fuck cars and double fuck irresponsible turds that would drive off after nearly killing someone.

    • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      In my state, statistics show that there are more fatalities on rural roads than in metro areas… and 80% of us live in the metro areas.

      My car is 900kg with a straight-through muffler. No kid is going under it. Just don’t drive a tank through school zones.

  • Nangijala@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    10 months ago

    I used to be a big fan of public transport, but after covid it went to shit in my country or rather, it went to shit in my part of the country. Pretty sure it is still great in Copenhagen. Those lucky bastards.

      • Nangijala@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        Right? Oh noooo I missed the metroooo. 🤭 2 minutes until the next one arrives?! Whatever will I doooo? 😜 And that is just the metro. Ignore the busses and trains which are also plenty and usually on time. Those lucky, lucky bastards.

        Meanwhile in my neck of the woods: 💨

        I could go into my public transportation horror stories, but I think it’s better to conclude my comment with the fact that my boyfriend and I, who were both big fans of public transportation, ended up buying a car because we literally had no other choice.

        • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          my boyfriend and I, who were both big fans of public transportation, ended up buying a car because we literally had no other choice.

          As a car guy, this breaks my heart. Because you probably bought something reasonable and practical and egg-shaped.

          Nothing that stirs your passions. Nothing you look back on in the parking lot and think “I can’t believe that’s my car.”

          As someone who thinks cars can be an art form, forcing people who don’t want cars to buy cars dilutes that art. Like making amazing designers make ads for bottled water or something.

          Cars should be like horses are now: Beautiful and running in a field. Cared for as cherished pets. Not resigned to bumper-to-bumper traffic, waiting for someone who hates driving to attempt to merge with a “Please let me merge before I cry” bumper sticker, herding the semi who’s just trying to do their job and not kill someone who should not be driving.

          • Nangijala@feddit.dk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            Yeah man! It was even white like an egg too because we couldn’t afford a color xD

            I will say that for my boyfriend’s part, I think our little egg car has brought him a lot of joy because he has more time and energy now that he doesn’t have to get up at 3.30 in the morning to get to work at 8.00. He likes nature too so he goes on several trips in his spare time to places he wouldn’t be able to reach otherwise, so if it is of any solace to you, our goofy little car has done some good to us. We even talk more because he started calling me on his commute home from work to chat about our day. During the public transport days, there was none of that because he was totally wiped out from being on the go since night time and into the afternoon where the only train or bus home would be home in our city around 18.00 or even 20.00 some days. For years our relationship was good morning and good night on week days because of how fucky public transport is and this was before covid too xD I feel like our car gave me back my boyfriend so I can’t hate on it too much even if it is ugly and boring to look at.

            But yeah, I appreciate your love for cars. I really feel your passion through your words. To me, cars are just a vehicle that takes you places so it’s nice to hear someone else’s perspective and having them remind you that cars could be more than just four wheels that drives you around.

        • reattach@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Right? Plus they’re clean and well-lit.

          I’ve spent some time in North Jutland too - I don’t think I saw a bus or train. It felt much more like home in terms of needing a car.

          • Nangijala@feddit.dk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            Yeah, they don’t care about investing in public transport for us because we are too rural or some shit like that. It’s not like we don’t want to use it. We just get ignored while Copenhagen is the darling of the land lol. It’s the result of centralization politics for decades that drives people into the cities while smaller communities in the countryside are starved of options like public transport, doctors and even shopping facilities. It was a very systematic move on politicians parts and I have lived both in bigger cities and smaller towns and witnessed the centralization happen in real time and how the smaller towns have been slowly strangled to death. It sucks. It didn’t used to be like this.

    • olivecrest@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      Depends on the bus / area.

      There is real time bus tracking now in most places so you can see when things will arrive = WAY better for dealing with traffic (note traffic is a thing for cars as well)

      I’m in Portland OR and of course a bus going through a bad area is more likely to have people who are “not ok” (addicts) but the vast majority of our busses are clean and climate controlled and filled with perfectly lovely friendly people.

      And risk assessment is based on what is likely. My aunt smoked her whole life and never got lung cancer so my “personal experience” is that smoking doesn’t cause cancer. You see what I’m saying?

      Cars are more dangerous than busses. Period. You might not like them for any number of perfectly valid reasons, and a specific bus in a specific area might be more dangerous - but the point of the post is that personal preference and accurate risk assessment are not the same thing.

    • ploot
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      You can’t generalize about public transport across the whole of the USA. It’s very variable between different cities, and some have pretty good systems.

        • chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          You mentioned one of the better systems but still mentioned busses? All the more enjoyable public transportation I’ve been on in the US has been trains and subways. My bus experiences haven’t been that enjoyable, but not horrid either …except that one time I had to sit near the bathroom at the back.

          Still, train/subway experiences in Chicago and New York/New Jersey/ Long Island were vastly superior to driving for me. There’s also a new line going from Orlando to Miami my sister has been using that sounds wonderful. Unfortunately doesn’t really reach where I currently am, greater Atlanta area. Unfortunately I have to drive most of the time for work etc, with no subway lines or when trains from my home to work, and the traffic is terrible at times.

    • sunflowercowboy@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s not really a choice for people. I get up at 3am and wait an hour for the bus just to be on time at 6am.

      Can’t do much and any job requires a license even if isn’t driving related - which instantly nullifies me if I use other acceptable forms of identification.

      Public transport is definitely safer, just more eventful. It’s nice when you enter a train that smells like fecal matter with a lady just eating a whole rotisserie chicken on the other side. It just follows the same guidelines as other public spaces, don’t be a nuisance and make yourself small. It becomes entertaining to have these stories.

      Some lady didn’t know to just shut up and complained nonstop about the shit on the floor. But then she made a comment about the lady and her chicken, it was small and innocuous. She then kept talking to the conductor.

      However, that is how you get slammed after you got stunned by some airborne rotisserie chicken.

      So it’s usually okay, just has rules like any house.

    • FundMECFSOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      10 months ago

      In America the metro is seen as where there are lots of poor people and drug addicts and the rich people tend to prefer to buy fancy cars and drive them.

      It’s kind of the same logic as to why america is one of the few countries where the poor people tend to live in the city center, but the rich people out in the suburbs.

        • Knoxvomica@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          10 months ago

          Counterpoint, the highways are also full of mentally ill people and statistically it’s more risky to drive than take the bus / train.

            • InputZero@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              10 months ago

              I think control has a lot to do with it as well. We feel better when we’re in control and on a subway you are most definitely not in control of the vehicle, or the people inside it. Regardless that it’s statistically safer than driving. I think people feel safer driving because they feel in control. Drivers can choose the route, who is in their vehicle, and when to stop. Those are things that we feel when we assess risk, even if it’s counter intuitive.

            • LaserRunRaccoon@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              Broken glass, fire, impalement, road rash, and being thrown around like a rag doll… thinking highway death isn’t violent is just a very fortunate lacking in imagination.

            • Malfeasant@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              You know what really “cleans up” public transportation? More people riding it than just those who have no other choice. I grew up in Boston, lots of people rode the subway, I never felt unsafe. Now I live in Phoenix, the bus system sucks so bad I couldn’t even tell you what it feels like to ride one because I never have, anywhere I want to go would take at least 2 routes if not 3, with nearly an hour wait at each connection, I could seriously ride a bicycle there quicker, and have, even in 110°+ heat, at least in my younger days- damn near gave myself heat stroke last time I tried which was ~5 years ago… I have at least ridden the light rail, which isn’t terrible, but doesn’t run very frequently, and isn’t that close to my house, and doesn’t go that many interesting places… I could take the kids to the science center, but it’s a bit long for them to walk to our nearest stop, about a mile and a half… There’s a park & ride, but at that point, we might as well take the car…

        • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          10 months ago

          That’s a very stretched definition of “full of”.

          Pre-pandemic I rode the subway to work every day. I’d see a handful of clearly unwell people on the train a week. I’d also see thousands of seemingly put-together people in that time. Is a milk jug full of milk and one jellybean full of jellybeans?

          I cannot speak authoritatively for women, but my understanding is most of the danger comes from men. Not mentally unwell people, not the homeless, just regular men. Being unwell or desperate doesn’t help, but it’s not the only source of danger.

          Furthermore, not everyone prefers personal vehicle transport. Maybe people prefer mass transit for a variety of reasons.

    • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 months ago

      People who don’t live here think it’s like The Warriors. They picture roving gangs of murderous criminals, live wires sparking everywhere, and insane people screaming Eldritch horrors. This is not accurate.

      • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        Okay, it’s not that bad, but it’s also not the kind and peaceful utopia people in this thread are trying to make it out to be.