Blåhaj Lemmy
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
no banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 9 months ago

Choose a number, 1-5!

lemmy.world

message-square
340
link
fedilink
529

Choose a number, 1-5!

lemmy.world

no banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 9 months ago
message-square
340
link
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • phoenixarise@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    234
    ·
    9 months ago

    2, and only 2.

    • RumorsOfLove@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      9 months ago

      Dont you love when you stick your fork into a potato and end up cutting the fucker in half? Thats what these wide tines do.

      • jaybone@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        9 months ago

        Looks like 4 has wider tines… and a couple others.

    • Wilco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yep, number two is the best.

      Give us a harder choice.

    • Kattiydid@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      9 months ago

      Agreed, none of the others are balanced properly or have good flow. Number two is the only option.

    • DoubleDongle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      2 is definitely the best-machined. Quality manufacturing right there.

      • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        9 months ago

        5 looks well made too. I like a slightly sporked fork though.

        • iheartneopets@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          That’s hilarious, 2 was my number one choice, and 5 was runner up if 2 wasn’t an option

        • Hupf@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          A sporked fork or, as I call it, a fpork.

    • TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      Has a stupid handle

      • phoenixarise@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Stupid but comfy. ☺️

    • arakhis_@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      I was like this, then I saw the handle. That being said its still 2 but its very close and it could be better still like the 1 or 5 handle

    • Uli@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      It is clear to me that the only explanation for your preference is nostalgia.

      • phoenixarise@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        I don’t understand. I think the handle would work best for my hands, and the prongs are just the right size for me.

        • Uli@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Those prongs are fine. The handle, though, it’s like having a huge counterweight on the back of the utensil. I can imagine liking it if it’s always been that way or if you have big hands. Otherwise, handle number 5 is the clear improvement - no sharp edges, properly balanced, not shaped like a wedge. Could hold that fork for days.

          • phoenixarise@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            I would also accept 2 with 4’s handle. ☺️

            • Uli@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              Yeah, 2 tines and 4 handle is a pretty good fork, I’ll admit. I just worry about the concave shape of the top side of the handle causing the edges to dig into my fingers with long-term use.

  • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    141
    ·
    9 months ago

    Handle of 5 + the fork of 3

    • Suck_on_my_Presence@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      9 months ago

      I am so on board with you

    • Uli@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      The will of the people

    • KSP Atlas@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Exactly

  • enkers@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    118
    ·
    9 months ago

    None of these. 2 has the best tines, but the handle sucks. These look like forks you’d find in a diner. Rounded outer tines is a crime against humanity. Did you maybe want a spork instead? 😡

    • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Please skip to 1:59

  • Pofski@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    9 months ago

    2

    • Dadifer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      9 months ago

      Obviously

  • recentSloth43@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    9 months ago

    Definitely 2. All other answers are just plain wrong.

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      2 is the only one with an acceptable handle!

      • Zentron@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        And points are actually pointy

  • WeaselOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    9 months ago
    1. Slim fork, wide handle.
    • Taleya@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      I can taste that flared base agaist my hard palate

    • mittyta@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I hate them! Because can’t fit to dishwasher basket

  • Pulptastic@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    9 months ago

    None. They’re all stamped from thin sheet metal. Tines and handles are too thin and will bend.

  • wolfpack86@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    9 months ago

    Head of 2, body of 5.

    • mister_flibble@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yeah, the actual fork bit of 2 is nice but I don’t like utensils with dump truck ass; they’re top heavy when in use.

    • Korne127@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      This is the correct answer

    • Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Nah just two all round

    • Doodle69420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      This is the only correct answer

    • pitiable_sandwich540@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I agree, but if we could include the prong to base ratio of 4, that’d be great. I feel like 2’s head is to… idk, flimsy? Either the base should extend further or the prongs be shorter. Great shape otherwise though…

      • wolfpack86@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        4 looks too spork like. No thanks

        • pitiable_sandwich540@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          First off, I agree 4’s the shape is wrong. But imagine the head shape of 2 and the length of base and prongs as like 4? Clearly better than an unmodified 2 head imho.

  • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    9 months ago

    Apostrophe catastrophe.

    Oh, there are forks: #2.

    • digger@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 months ago

      This is exactly what I thought, and in the same order.

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    9 months ago

    2, assuming the broad pommel is a counterweight. If it’s flimsy lightweight material then none of them.

  • CherryBullets@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    9 months ago

    Obviously #2, but with a slightly smaller handle tip and that’s about it.

  • RIPandTERROR@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    9 months ago

    2

  • Roundeyegweilo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    9 months ago

    It’s 2 and it ain’t even close

  • Novamdomum@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    9 months ago

    Clearly its the tines of 2 and the handle of 5. Anything else is madness.

    My reasoning is quite simple. The tines on the No.2 fork are longer than the others. Long things are often associated with quality, status and refinement (Long fingers, long lashes, long legs etc.). The extra length suggest dexterity and precision.

    Conversely the comparatively stubby tines of the No.1 fork would likely suit a toddler or an adult who isn’t allowed near pointy things without supervision. Similarly the tines of the No.5 fork suggest that this utensil was born wanting to be a spoon but then was made into a fork at the last minute. This hypothesis is further supported by the rounded end of it’s handle which would suit a spoon rather well.

    Numbers 3 and 4 forks are usually, in my experience found in establishments where you help yourself to cutlery from big pots with grubby labels marked “SPOONS”, “KNIVES” and “FORKS”.

    Now to the handles. Although the tines of the No.2 fork are pleasing, it then lets itself down with a handle that widens to the point of absurdity. Perhaps the thought was that it would help the extremely aged keep a firm grip while spooning tapioca past loose dentures.

    So a cleaned up fork made from an amalgam of the refined tines of No. 2 fork and the pleasantly rounded handle of No. 5 are the only option for any adult with reasonable dexterity.

  • phlegmy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    9 months ago

    Those all suck, this is the perfect fork. Those all suck. This one is the perfect fork

Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world

lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful

Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

…


2. No Illegal Content

Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

…


3. No Spam

Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

…


4. No Porn/Explicit

Content


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

…


5. No Enciting Harassment,

Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

…


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

…

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 2.77K users / day
  • 7.22K users / week
  • 12.4K users / month
  • 24.3K users / 6 months
  • 623 local subscribers
  • 36.5K subscribers
  • 18.6K Posts
  • 359K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Aer@lemmy.world
  • Striker@lemmy.world
  • WiildFiire@lemmy.world
  • Decoy321@lemmy.world
  • The Picard Maneuver@startrek.website
  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
  • The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world
  • UI: 0.19.13
  • BE: 0.19.13-modified
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org