• phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      80
      ·
      7 months ago

      Well you don’t have to ride with the poors and you pay direct instead of taxes for maximum inefficiency of money for value.

    • flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      ·
      7 months ago

      It’s a shared taxi/marshrutka/dollar van/jitney … Too many names but common across the world especially where the government is incapable of organizing proper public transport.

      Just repackaged for techbros.

      • acargitz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        7 months ago

        Exactly this. Interestingly, while in “those” places the government is incapable of organizing public transit, in US, the government chooses not to. It’s like learned helplessness at the society level.

      • Almacca@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        especially where the government is incapable of organizing proper public transport

        So, perfect for the USA then?

      • SnarkoPolo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 months ago

        I live in the San Diego area, and both our public transit agencies have the bus side privatized. Same shitty service and poor security for years. Meanwhile, the media labels public transit as something for freaks and losers, which provides a great reason not to improve it.

        • Almacca@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          The capitalist mindset is to start cutting services when patronage/profits drop. The public service mindset is to improve the service when they drop to increase patronage. Ideally, at least. Who knows what the government mindset is in fucking America. It seems to mostly consist of ‘hurt black people above all else’.

    • f314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      7 months ago

      You just know it’s going to be individual rail cars so we can have traffic jams on rails!

        • Zealousideal_Fox_900@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          7 months ago

          In Australia we do it by closing rail lines that are important, treating the non closed ones like horseshite, and only hiring the dumbest fuckwits possible to drive trains, slam brakes, and send people flying! 🥰🥰🥰

          • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            To be fair, train drivers slamming on the brakes can be good if the train is behind schedule. It allows them to catch up by like half a minute per stop which adds up.

        • Almacca@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          I reckon you should consider that an embarrassment of riches, coming from a city with half hourly trains at PEAK.

    • als
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      In the UK uber sell train tickets (not that they run the trains)

  • acargitz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    7 months ago

    You guys don’t get it. It is like public transportation but with the following “features”:

    1. No poors.
    2. Owner can exclude anyone they don’t like
    3. No job security/unionization for the staff
  • Nightwatch Admin@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    7 months ago

    Adam Something has a done a whole bunch of videos ridiculing tech bro reinventions of bus and train, great stuff.

  • Avicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    7 months ago

    wait wait wait hear me out, what if we had something bigger than a car and it still had a single driver but multiple passengers???

  • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    7 months ago

    Lemme guess, next they’ll try connecting multiple carriages to carry more people per vehicle then work with local governments to build dedicated right of way…etc etc…

    • homura1650@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 months ago

      And put some guidelines in the road to assist with self driving. Maybe make them out of metal for improved durability. Then swap out the rubber-wheeled tires for some more efficient and less poluting conical metal wheels since we don’t need to worry about them running on asphalt anymore.

      Oooh. And as long as we have multiple carriages connected, we can add a walkway between them. Then instead of all of them being for passengers, they can subsidize the cost by having a car dedicated to selling snacks, or other items. You can literally buy your morning coffee from the road!

      • HSR🏴‍☠️@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 months ago

        Do you want everyone to just sit there, drink their coffee, read daily news or a book and gasp interact with others like some kind of savages? Back in my day we stared at same-looking highways for hours, it builds character.

  • applemao@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 months ago

    If there is something anyone under 30 should have learned in today’s world, is that capitalism will ALWAYS enshittify even the best idea. Always.

  • Hnery@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 months ago

    Lol, that kind of is a thing already in rural areas of germany. They go by beautiful names like RufBus and AnrufSammelTaxi and are provided by several state owned public transportation companies in low passenger areas/times of day. Usually, it’s an additional 2 € per drive on top of the transportation ticket you need to have/buy.

    • Lumidaub@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      rural areas

      That’s the difference though - they’re planning for cities (and they’re a private company). German cities mostly have decent to very good public transport. I lived in a very rural area (a handful of buses every weekday) for the first 20 years of my life and then moved to the city at least 100 years ago. I’m still in awe of the transport system here (as shitty as it sometimes is).

      • desktop_user [they/them] Banned
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        a handful of busses on the weekdays sounds like a major city for my American mind. Rural taxi busses are where the taxi service is actually multi person vans that pick you up and drop you off and make stops for others on the way.

  • chickenf622@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 months ago

    Of course they re-invented the bus. It’s like carcinisation but the end product is always trains or busses., but if this means less cars on the roads I think I’m for it. As long as cities don’t get lazy and use this an excuse to cut their bus programs.

  • aeronmelon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 months ago

    What’s that other meme? The one about how every few years tech bros reinvent public transportation.

  • BmeBenji (he/him)@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’m pretty sure it’s public transportation with fewer steps!

    Now the public doesn’t have to worry about pesky “democracy” to make decisions about who’s commanding the transportation. The shareholders interests will do that for you!