• Jaysyn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    372
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    EDIT: Kidnapping. The word you’re ignoring in the title is kidnapping.

        • Doorbook@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          9 months ago

          there was one in 2010 where the bomb and killed people

          Six civilian ships of the Gaza Freedom Flotilla were raided by Israel on 31 May 2010 in international waters in the Mediterranean Sea. Nine of the flotilla passengers were killed during the raid, with thirty wounded (including one who later died of his wounds).[1][2] Ten Israeli soldiers were wounded, one seriously. The exact sequence of events is contested, in part due to the IDF’s confiscation of the passengers’ photographic evidence.[3] The flotilla, organized by the Free Gaza Movement and the Turkish Foundation for Human Rights and Freedoms and Humanitarian Relief (İHH), was carrying humanitarian aid and construction materials, intending to break the Israeli naval blockade of the Gaza Strip.

      • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        9 months ago

        Cute idea. But unfortunately not practical. For something as valuable/kg as cocaine, you can go to the trouble of using a narco sub. But there’s zero chance such a sub could practically carry cheap bulky goods like flour, rice, etc.

        You might be able to use them to smuggle in medicines though.

        • Olgratin_Magmatoe@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          So then don’t carry flour and rice, go with pemmican or something similar, high protein, high caloric, high density food.

          A brick of pemmican is better than nothing, which is what they currently have.

  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    122
    ·
    9 months ago

    Adalah, an Israel-based non-governmental legal organization that is representing some of the activists, said that those who remain are being held in Givon Prison in Ramleh, central Israel.

    So grab the passengers of a boat in international wares and jail them in Israel. 😒

    In a statement to CNN, Israel said that it “is preventing the entry of all vessels into the Gaza Strip, in accordance with international law.”

    Is there a charitable interpretation that could make this statement true?

    • Kirp123@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      98
      ·
      9 months ago

      The ship was nowhere near Gaza. They were off the coast of Egypt in International waters. Israel just kidnapped a bunch of people. Also they only released Greta? What about the other people?

        • rumimevlevi@lemmings.worldBanned
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          They refuse to sign a document saying that they enteres israel legally which make it look like israel kidnapping was legal and legitimate

      • GojuRyu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Greta is one of four activists that have been sent home. According to Israel only those four signed the papers neededfor it and the rest are expected to be sent home after a court have ruled they can. Basically the remaining 8 activists reportedly chose not to give Israel the easy way of getting rid of them. I don’t have any English news sources though, as I read it in a newspaper in my native language.

    • SinningStromgald@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      9 months ago

      Is there a charitable interpretation that could make this statement true?

      Since Gaza is an open air prison under the control of Israel and not recognized as an independent state we can blockade it all we want.

      Best I got.

      Really hard to justify genocide.

      • Randelung@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        9 months ago

        Palestine is not a recognized country in most of the western world, which in itself is a travesty, but you can probably infer a lot of bs from that.

        Like claiming a certain religious group has no human rights bc they’re not recognized as humans.

        • Kirp123@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          9 months ago

          Palestine is not a recognized country in most of the western world, which in itself is a travesty, but you can probably infer a lot of bs from that.

          That’s not even true.

          As of March 2025, the State of Palestine is recognized as a sovereign state by 147 of the 193 member states of the United Nations, or just over 75% of all UN members. It has been a non-member observer state of the United Nations General Assembly since November 2012.

          75% of the world recognizes Palestine as a sovereign state.

          • lividweasel@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            21
            ·
            9 months ago

            To be fair, they specified “western world”. If you look at the map of countries that recognize Palestine, it’s pretty glaring that a good chunk of Europe, Canada/US, and Australia/NZ don’t officially recognize it.

      • Saleh@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        9 months ago

        They declared war? So they recognize a Palestinian state and Gaza as part of that states territory? They recognize Hamas as the government of Gaza?

        Meanwhile the ICJ ruled that the blockade of Gaza amounts to a de facto occupation, well before Oct. 7. Furthermore the ICJ ruled that this occupation is illegal. So Israel is obliged to end the occupation, including the blockade as well as having the obligation to provide for the people under its occupation. An obligation which Israel also violates by the blockade.

        On top of that there has been multiple rulings of preliminary measures Israel has to take to prevent the risk of a genocide being committed against the Palestinian people. The key obligation again being unhindered access for humanitarian aid.

        Nothing of what Israel is doing is legal by international law.

            • Samskara@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Page 898

              Outside the blockade area and on the high seas,34 belligerents relied on the practice of "visit and search"3s to stop vessels suspected of carrying “con-traband” to the enemy.36 A belligerent warship sailing on the high seas had the right to visit and search all merchant vessels. Merchants found carrying enemy contraband were captured and escorted to the belligerent’s nearest home port. The belligerent nation’s prize court then determined the fate of the captured ship and cargo.37 In cases where merchants resisted either capture or visit and search, the blockading force was entitled to pursue and, if neces-sary, damage or destroy the vessel to force the ship to submit.

              Page 901

              belligerents today continue to enforce blockades from long distance or through blockade zones. They do so because of three twentieth-century developments in maritime warfare: first, the growing importance to belligerents of conducting economic warfare in conjunction with armed con-flict;s3 second, the introduction of a large array of new weapons to the maritime battlefield; and third, the proliferation of modern weapons to less powerful nations incapable of conducting traditional blockade. In combination, these three developments have forced states to replace traditional blockade form with long-distance blockade or blockade zones.

  • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    9 months ago

    What an anemic headline. How did she become detained? By an act of piracy and kidnapping in international waters. CNN is a tool of the oligarchs.

    • Samskara@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 months ago

      Intercepting a ship that intends to run a blockade in international waters is legal according to international law. The flotilla had stated its intention repeatedly and were warned several times before being intercepted and finally boarded.

      • CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        9 months ago

        That assumes the blockade is legal though? Has an international court that is recognized by the ship’s flag country declared the legality of the blockade?

        • Samskara@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          I don’t know of a court ruling. The UN‘s Palmer Report declared it Legal.

          However as with lots of things regarding international law, there are different opinions.

      • jacksilver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        It’s actually gotten worse. The management of CNN changed recentlyish and has been pushing CNN more to the right. I think it was to increase viewership, but ultimately just means the quality (not that it was very high to begin with) has dropped.

        • phx@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Watching their recent coverage of LA and NY I was kinda astounded by the slant on it.

    • untakenusername@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      By an act of piracy and kidnapping in international waters.

      you might disagree with what’s happening but this was legal. Israel has a blockade there

      • Snowclone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        9 months ago

        It’s a really good example of how abuse and evil can often be legal while doing what’s right can often be illegal.

  • Scrambled Eggs @lazysoci.al
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    9 months ago

    I honestly didn’t expect her to survive this one. She made it publicly known what she was doing so Israel couldn’t say it was a normal bombing of transport ships. But I figured they would use her as an example and destroy the ship.

    • nlgranger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      9 months ago

      One person on board with her is a European Union member of parliament from France. That provides a lot more protection than Greta’s reputation can.

      • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        9 months ago

        Israel shot at a group of European diplomats two weeks ago and Europe did not care.

        Greta has way more clout than the European Parliament.

        • nlgranger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 months ago

          I listen to the news almost every day and missed that. I guess it shows how bad things are that it didn’t make the news…

    • Bo7a@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      9 months ago

      Elated to be wrong. You see, that is how being an adult works. Sometimes you are wrong, and when you are wrong about something with a positive outcome, you are happy that you were wrong.

      • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        but also, spending energy on prevention (the publicity) and then when the thing doesn’t occur saying “i guess we were wrong” is the wrong take i think

        same thing with Y2K and plenty of engineering things: people were saying “it was no big deal! yall were saying planes were going to fall out of the sky! we wasted so much time and money!”… yeah; it was a huge and expensive effort that’s why the bad things didn’t happen

    • thisnameisnottolong@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      9 months ago

      Ooh check out the genocide apologist, making a super strong argument about how just and honorable Israel is. So intelligent and brave! You should get a sticker from Bibi to put on your shirt.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      9 months ago

      Public attention from them and others is why she’s being gently handled. You should thank those who raised the alarm on her behalf, not Israel.

  • harmsy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    9 months ago

    If you want to get food aid into Gaza, it might be best to smuggle it in using drones or cartel subs.

        • Jankatarch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          9 months ago

          If it doesn’t matter anyway in the end then why not make it better for now?

          Small stuff like “not comitting a genocide” won’t impact anyone after humanity declines so we might as well not commit genocide, no? Same for climate change.

          Sure you may not want to do it but why insult people who want and enjoy doing it. Especially if you truly believe their actions don’t change anything.