• u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.orgEnglish
      7·
      6 months ago

      You guys have sound? I can’t unmute it in Lemmy, and directly on Imgur the unmute is grayed out.

      Edit: Hmm, works on Firefox, again

      Not the first time some media worked only in Firefox, but not Chrome. Embedded FLAC wouldn’t play (despite it being supported), WebSDR audio wouldn’t start, from the other times I recall.
      Again being reminded to switch.

          • Psythik@lemmy.worldEnglish
            2·
            6 months ago

            Have you considered using a Lemmy app? I don’t have these issues you’re having in Voyager. You’re browsing Lemmy the hard way for no good reason.

            • u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.orgEnglish
              5·
              6 months ago

              Voyager

              Have you replied to the wrong person?

              If you were replying to me, the WebUI is best optimized for landscape use, and I don’t like using my phone in portrait mode much, especially if I want to type.
              Plus I get tabs. The Android multitasking is unreliable, and switching is inconvenient. There’s no desktop-like panel, and background apps often die if more of them are open at once.
              Lastly, embeds. Apps usually only work with images with regular URL, the WebUI works with Images, Video, Audio also in base64 data tag for tiny images, and images can be made into buttons.

              Let me give you examples:

              This is the Bulgarian Radio 1 stream:
              Probably broken in most Lemmy apps.

              And here’s a button, but in base64 so it’s directly in the comment, since it is pretty small:
              Probably also broken in some apps.

              These are edge cases, but an advantage too. If I wasn’t lazy, I could use animated bullets and lines like on the old web, but in Lemmy comments.

              Welcome to this example comment

              Make sure to:

              Have fun
              Use Linux
              placeholder_text

              bottom_text

          • DancingBear@midwest.socialEnglish
            1·
            6 months ago

            Do you have more information on this? I have an android gadget with google apps installed but I try to mainly use Firefox…

            I listen to bbc with this gadget when I take a shower in the morning before work…

            Recently, in firefox the sound started shutting off after a couple minutes, and I had to start using chrome…. I assumed it was something nefarious where they are trying to collect more user data…

            The gadget thinks I live in a random place on the planet and I don’t use it for anything other than a mobile game I play and movies and listening to the radio… anyways, I’d much prefer to use Firefox…

            • u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.orgEnglish
              2·
              6 months ago

              I think this could rather be related to power saving if the screen is locked.

              I prefer to use a dedicated internet radio app. VLC also works if you obtain the direct stream (check online or play around with element inspector).

      • SparroHawc@lemmy.zipEnglish
        1·
        6 months ago

        Very few things refuse to work on Firefox mobile. The one exception I’ve run across is trying to log into Google, which insists that I should use a ‘compatible’ browser. Like Chrome.

        If I switch what user agent Firefox is reporting so that it LOOKS like I’m using Chrome, it works perfectly, surprise, surprise. I hate Google.

  • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.worldEnglish
    47·
    6 months ago

    Maybe it’s because half their raps are in Gaeilge or the BBC just didn’t check, but booking Kneecap and not expecting to hear something about governments and Palestine would be like booking NWA and cutting their mics if they played Fuck the Police.

    Great job riling up the crowd for Vylan’s new chant there, genius move.

    • lama@lemmy.worldEnglish
      28·
      6 months ago

      Lol they basically did that before. They booked Rage Against The Machine to play “Killing in the Name of” live. It has the line “Fuck you I won’t do what you tell me” and they asked RATM to censor it while they played. The BBC was then somehow surprised when RATM didn’t do what they told them. source

    • Darren@sopuli.xyzEnglish
      5·
      6 months ago

      Thing is, afaik, the BBC has nothing to do with booking the artists. They just broadcast the sets and hold them on the iPlayer for a month after. Kneecap (and Bob Vylan) were booked by the Glastonbury organisers.

  • Dagnet@lemmy.worldEnglish
    45·
    6 months ago

    I’ll go check his songs now, just from that chant I can tell he has a way with music

  • BigDiction@lemmy.worldEnglish
    35·
    6 months ago

    Brits are so fucking good at chants. Caught the quick rhythm and even the melody in just a bar.

  • Longpork3@lemmy.nzEnglish
    17·
    6 months ago

    Anyone got a video of the rest of this set? Searching for it just brings up page after page of genocide apologists getting upset over the warmup.

    • IndustryStandard@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
      12·
      6 months ago

      Your comment might be intended for elsewhere.

      But if you want to upload videos for Lemmy, catbox.moe provides free anonymous upload. Simply link to the video afterwards in your post, and it will automatically embed on lemmy as long as the link is directly to the playable video.

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zipEnglish
    6·
    6 months ago

    Am I the only one who thinks this is a bit Nazi? Calling for the death of Israel seems problematic. It can easy expand target all Jewish people.

    • stormEnglish
      20·
      6 months ago

      No, the actually antisemitic claim is that Israel and the IDF are representative of Judaism and/or Jewish people. They are fascist organizations and the conflation of these groups with Jewish people at large (a narrative pushed by Israel and their allies) is what endangers them

    • verdigris@lemmy.mlBannedEnglish
      19·
      6 months ago

      The IDF is a military force actively engaged in ethnic cleansing and genocide. Israel itself is a colonist state that only exists thanks to constant violence threatened and perpetrated by its military and the US. It is not in any way antisemitic to criticize these entities up to and including advocating for their dissolution. Anyone who takes this valid criticism and turns it into “Jews Bad” is either incapable of understanding the complexity of the issues here, is a bad faith actual anti-Semite looking for an excuse, or has fallen for the ubiquitous state propaganda that has been conditioning this exact response.

      States and militaries are not culture. Nationalism is not identity. Fascism must be dismantled whatever form it takes.

    • rozodru@lemmy.worldEnglish
      12·
      6 months ago

      so if I say “death to Nazi’s” by your logic, you’d have issues with that. Saying “Death to Nazi’s” could easily expand target to all Germans, All white people, or hell at this point All Americans.

      see how flawed your logic is?

    • neons@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
      4·
      6 months ago

      No, you’re not. This is generally classified as antisemitic. But for a multitude of reasons people don’t care or even see it as a good thing. Reasons including:

      • Decades of being told that there’s always a good side in war (there rarely is, I can only think of ukraine in this century and WW2 in - the last century),
      • being propagandized into warthirsty “patriots”,
      • being radicalized during covid,
      • getting radicalized by (a)social media

      you get the idea

    • reddit_sux@lemmy.worldEnglish
      2·
      6 months ago

      They are just calling for the death of the SS and SA not Germans Israeli or Jews in general. Sorry thought this was 1933.

    • Zetta@mander.xyzEnglish
      49·
      6 months ago

      I feel like wishing people who are purposefully murdering children would die is not hateful and actually a pretty moral stance

        • RavingGrob@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
          20·
          6 months ago

          So in your mindset, there’s zero point where killing is “justifiable”?

          I’m legitimately asking here.

          In a perfect world, people would respect boundaries, not start war, or genocides to further their own beliefs.

          What do you propose people facing extinction do? Parlay?

            • RavingGrob@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
              17·
              6 months ago

              Troll? You haven’t answered either of my questions? Lmao. Not everything is black and white my guy.

              Again, I am legitimately curious what your opinions about this are.

              You can sling insults all you want. It doesn’t further your argument in any legitimate way.

                • RavingGrob@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
                  14·
                  6 months ago

                  I am not disingenuous in asking them.

                  I’m not even necessarily talking about the current situation here.

                  I’m asking you, where your line in the sand is.

                  If someone was in your home, threatening your life, or your loved one’s lives, and they absolutely were not empty threats, would violence to the point of killing be “justified”?

                  For example, should the Ukrainians not defend their sovereignty, on their own soil, because killing at all is immoral?

                  You came at this with a black and white statement, but there are nuances to the world that shape the decisions outside of a binary “they killed/didn’t kill”

                • Caveman@lemmy.worldEnglish
                  5·
                  6 months ago

                  If one side kills 100 for each one of their own killed there’s a big difference. Other factors to consider is when your land is blocked off from the outside world by land, sea and air and being routinely invaded. The Geneva convention says there is a right to resist occupation on top of that which Israel did sign.

            • J92@lemmy.worldEnglish
              4·
              6 months ago

              Jesus, those are some thoroughly piss-soaked chips you’ve got there, petal.

                • J92@lemmy.worldEnglish
                  2·
                  6 months ago

                  Your ability to admit you don’t understand it is a big step. Now you just need to address your previous commenters in the same light, with the questions you’ve been asked and are too afraid to answer. We believe in you, champ.

        • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
          14·
          6 months ago

          I’m sure no one here wishes that anyone HAD to die. Most ethical systems throughout history have a moral justification for killing, if the death will prevent further killing of innocent people. If it’s immoral to kill someone actively murdering children and about to murder more, are you saying it would be preferable to let the children be killed?

            • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
              17·
              6 months ago

              You aren’t clever, trying to say we shouldn’t kill Nazis in a war against Nazis.

              This isn’t rhetorical, tell me. If someone is about to shoot a child, and the only way we could stop them is through military action, what would you do?

                • spacesatan@leminal.spaceEnglish
                  15·
                  6 months ago

                  You almost have a point but to get there you have to ignore the entire actual context of the conflict. It’s not just killing because of killing, there’s an entire ongoing expansionist colonial project making one party clearly the aggressor.

                • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
                  10·
                  6 months ago

                  You avoided my question, I would like to know your answer, not some idealist moralizing. I am saying my question isn’t rhetorical because I want to know what you would suggest we do to stop a genocide that doesn’t entail any violence at all. I am genuinely curious! I am Buddhist, I agree killing is wrong and don’t even kill ants or flies.

                  Israel is commiting genocide against Palestine. They are shooting and bombing dozens of children and women every single day, while starving all of Gaza and letting them die of preventable illness. Tell me how many Israeli children have been killed in the war today? If a Palestinian is about to shoot a child whether in Israel or anywhere, someone would be justified in stopping them. But that is not the situation. Israel has pinned Gazans into a deathtrap with no food, water, and hardly any healthcare system remaining, now using ‘aid’ centers to further their indiscriminate murder.

                  If any killing at all is wrong, then you would suggest people sat by and watch the Nazis finish the holocaust, because it would have been wrong to fight back?

        • Caveman@lemmy.worldEnglish
          5·
          6 months ago

          In a hypothetical where there’s a murderer with a machine gun killing children that will not be prosecuted in court then wishing them to be dead is pretty reasonable if you want the killing to stop.

          Not saying killing is moral or that people don’t have the right to live because they do but how else would you stop the murder if the government doesn’t?

    • b161English
      12·
      6 months ago

      Yes you are, you genocidal child killer.

    • Hansae@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
      5·
      6 months ago

      Idk I’d suggest looking at the state of Gazas hospitals and childrens services (all done specifically by the IDF) before coming to such a bad conclusion. Shitting on the IDF is the best thing people can be doing, there has unfortunately been some genuinely anti semitic stuff mixed in with the pro Palestinian movement but this ain’t it chief.