• sbv@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    7 months ago

    This seems really premature. I dislike Carney’s policies for a bunch of reasons, but it’s premature to shit on him for this. We don’t know what the final trade agreement will be.

    The last time Trump threw one of these tantrums, NAFTA morphed into USMCA without much of a hit to our economy (afaiu). If our government can repeat that success while we’re diversifying our economy away from the US then that’s a win.

    • hexonxonx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      7 months ago

      You just said why it’s a stupid, stupid thing to do: Trump would have caved anyway. All Carney had to do is wait.

      That he would cave so quickly shows how little he values Canadian interests over American profits.

      • CircaV@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        7 months ago

        And to that I would just add - people are PISSED. People will literally self-deputize in a second if America rolls in with tanks or drones or whatever (they are already setting the stage for that with their relentless internal and external rhetoric about how “dangerous” Canada is with migrants and terrorists supposedly flooding in to their stupid country from the northern border). This is a very sketchy time. America can 🖕🖕🖕🇨🇦hates you

    • Jhex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      7 months ago

      We don’t know what the final trade agreement will be.

      It doesn’t matter since Trump can reneg on it at any moment as he did with the previous one

      What Carney did here is signal trump that he will chicken out even faster than trump does at any tartrum he throws

      • CircaV@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        The US wiped its ass with first NAFTA, now CUSMA, it will wipe its ass with whatever comes from this shitshow. The US cannot be trusted. It’s signature is worthless on any documents. I hope this is all lip service and we are doing the real trade negotiation with the EU, Asia, Lat Am.

        • Jhex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          precisely, which is why I see zero benefit in appeasing or even negotiating with the orange turd

          • spankinspinach@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            I’m of the opinion that letting Trump think he’s “winning” while playing backdoor politics with friendly nations to defend Canada’s interests is not a bad approach. If they can make it to the American midterms, hopefully he’ll get hamstrung and become a lame duck president. Assuming he doesn’t find some archaic way of overriding them…

            • Jhex@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              is that what we are doing or just wishful thinking?

              so far all I have seen from Carney is everything Trump would want. C2 takes Canada a step closer to a police state supposedly to fight fentanyl smuggling. C5 gives oil and gas a free ride and allows the envirioment to go to shit as long as oil and gas are making money

              if this is “pretending” to let trump win, I fail to see the difference to capitulating

              finally, there will be no midterm nor can we bend over and give trump everything for 2 years hoping what? that the Dems will save us? tüat’s beyond naive

    • grte@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      I really don’t care what the trade deal looks like, letting the US president dictate Canada’s internal tax policy is a bridge too far for me.

    • Disaster@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Well, there was this thing a couple of weeks ago when international law as well as agreed upon nuclear safeguards and processes were well and truly shredded by a genocidal maniac, then he came out tutting against the guys that got attacked out of the blue just like every other G7 lapdog. So far, unimpressed.

  • Sillyglow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    So does no one here understand the concept of manufactured chaos as a distraction ?

    The service tax was put in place ages ago but was never enforced. It’s the same trick with the whole border czar bullshit where Donald needs to feel big about something as a distraction despite its a throw away card and often something that was already agreed upon even without the US.

    Carney only kicked it up for Donald’s ego to feel like he made a deal. Why? Cuz Cheeto thrives on drama. Meanwhile Canada stole the wheat export market from right under the nose of trump. As well as a few other things no doubt.

    Canada is slowly disempowering US but needs some keys to periodically dangle in Donald’s face while they do it.

    Sheinbaum is a pro at this game and has been playing it cleanly for 7 months. Carney’s simply following suit.

    • Subscript5676@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’m gonna need some citations or sources for that.

      AFAIK, the service tax was not “put in place ages ago”. It was put in force in June 2024, literally last year, and the first payments were expected literally yesterday, on June 30th, 2025. It’s retroactive, but still only goes back to 2022, which isn’t “ages ago”. Source

      And what’s this wheat market steal you’re talking about?

    • Allemaniac@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      Rutte did it too with his daddy comment. Stroke the ego of the big baby and prevent more tantrum from said baby

      • Sillyglow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        To the simple minded it looks like that.

        But I’ve already explained it goes deeper than that.

    • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Before we applaud the 5d chess move, we are a bishop down, and no obvious plan to gain back prosperity/material. Flattering the narcisist with a sacrifice to win is indistinguishable from continued full submission and gaslighting us into it.

  • Daniel Quinn@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    7 months ago

    Why would the Conservatives bring this government down, when it’s doing everything they want and taking the blame?

    • Jhex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 months ago

      the conservatives are a joke and they wouldn’t bring the gov down as you suggest, but the Block and the NDP may and either would get my vote at this point… Carney could not have been more backstabby to the people that gave him the PM seat at this point

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 months ago

    Yep, I’m slightly upset. Does he actually think something worthwhile is going to come out of the negotiations?

  • lazylion_ca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 months ago

    Y’all are remembering that it’s us Canadians that will be paying this tax, right? It’s not going to affect any company’s bottom line in the slightest.

    • patatas@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      7 months ago

      It only applies to a few enormous corporations, that mostly generate revenue through ad sales.

      Would Canadian companies really all have increased their Facebook ad budgets over this? I kinda doubt it, tbh

        • CircaV@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Does it target the billionaire tech bros or will Canadians pay it? Which one is it?? If Canadians are gonna pay it - why would Trump care? If it targets billionaire bros - big whoop! It’s so small it doesn’t even register.

          • Routhinator@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            Canadians pay it and are hopefully turned to other options, smaller companies, and hopefully Canadian ones. That would drive Amazon’s business down, and that hurts the billionaires more than the tax.

    • NebulaNymph@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      You can stop copy and pasting this, it’s not true

      About the tax

      The digital services tax applies at a rate of 3% on revenue earned from:

      • Certain digital services that rely on engagement, data, and content contributions of Canadian users

      • Certain sales or licensing of Canadian user data

      Canadian digital services revenue is calculated on a calendar year basis and is earned from:

      • Online marketplace services

      • Online advertising services

      • Social media services

      • Certain sales of user data

  • rocky1138@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 months ago

    Is that person a Canadian? Social media posts aren’t really indicative of the general feeling of a given populace. It’s dangerous to think otherwise.

  • Oderus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 months ago

    I always thought he DST was stupid so to me this is nothing more than placating Trump.

      • sbv@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 months ago

        Canada’s implementation is different from other countries’:

        • It’s retroactive to 2022 - so the corps in question would have to drop a big payout in the first year.
        • It’s slightly higher than the UK tax that the yanks didn’t call out. (3% vs. 2%)

        I don’t know if I would call it stupid, but that retroactive thing seems odd. I don’t know much about corporate tax law, so maybe that’s a thing? I dunno.

        • leastaction@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          7 months ago

          The idea was to give the Americans time to negotiate something before the tax came into effect. If they didn’t do it in 3 years, I don’t know why Carney thinks giving in will lead to any benefit for Canada.

        • karlhungus@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          7 months ago

          I don’t get the hate, it seems like about time these ultra rich companies paid some taxes?

          • sbv@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            7 months ago

            I think the companies are the only ones who hate the DST. That and their puppet politicians.

            • karlhungus@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              the parent of this thread thinks it’s stupid, and got up voted but like zero explanation. Looking at their post history they don’t seem like a bot

        • gaiussabinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          7 months ago

          They were told about the implementation and the date active. They have chosen not to pay. The total to current date is due. Its like me not doing my taxes for seven years and receiving the letter from the cra that I had better bring my taxes to current year or face fines. Same deal for businesses.

      • Oderus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        The percentage seemed arbitrary and it being retroactive seemed excessive and unnecessary. We depend on US content so much you couldn’t possibly function on the internet without it. It’ll force the US to limit services so we’ll be forced to use Chinese or European services and for what benefit? I use an adblocker and pirate most my stuff so no one is making money off me.

        • karlhungus@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          The percentage seemed arbitrary and it being retroactive seemed excessive and unnecessary.

          What?! 3% We pay 8.79% on our income here. Three seems low.

          I feel like no facebook in canada would be a net positive, especially after reading “Carless people”. I don’t even think that would happen, it’s not like these companies can’t afford it, they just don’t want to set a precedent, and they spent all that money on trump!

          I use an adblocker and pirate most my stuff so no one is making money off me.

          You never use Amazon? I also use an adblocker and a pihole i think i see relatively fewer ads, i still see them.

          The one negative i can think of coming out of this is the companies passing the tax on to us, i suspect that wouldn’t happen.

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    Canadians are great hockey players … but no matter how good they are, they’ll still cave in if they are offered a million dollar contract and throw the game

  • Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    As Canadians we cannot expect Carney to fix the problems on his own. We, as individuals, need to stop buying American to the fullest extent that we can and if we can’t buy Canadian either buy other countries or not at all. It’s amazing the stuff that you don’t actually need but have been manipulated into buying due to American advertising. It is hard to do it overnight but with time, most American products can be resourced.

  • MyBrainHurts@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    Out of curiousity, how many workers should lose their jobs to appease your sense of righteousness?

    A trade negotiation is not the same as bowing to fascism.

    • CircaV@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Uhhhh in case you didn’t notice - when Amazon in QC unionized, Amazon pulled out of Quebec. We don’t need US digital services, it’s one of the easiest things we can replace. Might be a headache for some workplaces to get off Microsoft, SharePoint, or azure but ultimately - it’s not that hard. IT can do it. We have server farms and digital services in Canada. It’s easy to replace as opposed to say, re-tooling a car factory.

      Do you really need Facebook, X, Apple, Netflix, Disney+ shitmaganda!? Or can you grab what you want from Crave or the high Cs. Our newspapers are largely already owned by US hedge fund billionaire massive global corporations - so taxing them at a minuscule rate is nothing to them. And they are free to fuck off doing business in our country if they don’t like the DST. This was a cowardly and weak capitulation on the part of Carney - unless we are infact joining the EU and OECD on a digital service tax as part of a bloc of countries (which could track).

      https://pro.bloombergtax.com/insights/international-tax/understanding-digital-services-taxes-the-oecd/#oecd-and-taxation

      But right now, we don’t know - so am skeptical about what Carney just gave up.

      • MyBrainHurts@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        Lol, A) it’s pretty clear you have no idea what the DST is and what it does.

        B) Jesus lord, for most offices, converting off Microsoft would be an insane task and a huge IT cost.

        I know Lemmy skews young but this is nonsensical.

        • funkajunk 🇨🇦@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          7 months ago

          Yeah, as someone who works in Enterprise environments, I don’t understand where this attitude that it would be easy is coming from.

          Fully migrating off those services could take years for some organizations, just like it took years to get them to the level of functionality and interconnectivity they are at today.

      • MyBrainHurts@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        It’s a trade negotiation, it’s literally all about the jobs.

        I get that you aren’t affected but thousands are.

        By your logic, we should just not do anything with our largest trading partner and I dunno, just wait for almost half a decade until we like the administration?