• ccunning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    191
    ·
    7 months ago

    It means Banksy, who has remained anonymous for more than 25 years, could finally be unmasked as he would be required to publicly disclose his name if brought to court.

    Gonna be hard to bring them to court if you don’t even know their name, isn’t it?

  • AlexLost@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    175
    ·
    7 months ago

    Ah yes, going after world renowned artist for graffiti because he made them feel bad. Truth speaking to power will always be unpopular with those in power.

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    7 months ago

    So they destroyed a priceless artwork, and are essentially planning to kill graffiti Santa next.

    I wonder who’s ordering this, and if they’re aware it will not help the public opinion problem they’re having.

    • Hroderic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’m pretty sure they no longer care about public opinion, they’re confident there’s nothing we can (or will) do.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        That is the vibe the UK government gives in particular sometimes. There’s been a few issues over the past decade and a bit where they just haven’t given a fuck about privacy, free speech or recourse against the authorities.

        It’s mistake to think that way, though, because the nation actually is a democracy now.

  • palordrolap@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    7 months ago

    Banksy is as much a person as Nicolas Bourbaki was. Although unlike Bourbaki, there is allegedly one guy who is kind of the main guy, but if that one guy goes to prison, I’m fairly certain Bansky artworks will continue to appear.

    In fact I’d put money on the fact that one would appear in a prominent place soon after.

    And if the establishment somehow manage to round up every single person associated with Banksy and manage to get something to stick to every single one of them, which I strongly doubt is possible, the rise in wannabe Banksy groups doing the same thing won’t be far off.

    The artwork is almost always made with stencils and spray paints. Stencils can be prepared well in advance. A trained group could have one of these up in under a couple of minutes.

    If I was Banksy - or one of them - I would almost certainly have distributed my art to trusted individuals for the event of my incarceration and beyond.

    • meco03211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      7 months ago

      In fact I’d put money on the fact that one would appear in a prominent place soon after.

      I mean, if it’s multiple people and the ones not incarcerated don’t immediately drop more art, I’d be disappointed.

  • skisnow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    7 months ago

    So telling that they tolerated his “criminal damage” for literally decades, until it made them actually look bad.

    • BenjiRenji@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      7 months ago

      No… they just have become more repressive and no longer tolerate being called out. This is a scary reaction for democracy for just a painting on a wall.

      • skisnow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        7 months ago

        All the other Banksy’s I can think of are just vaguely subversive about the system in general. CCTVs, Policemen kissing, hoodie wearer throwing flowers, assorted things about urban decay, that sort of thing. This is the first one I can think of that calls out a specific current event that you can attach names to.

  • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    7 months ago

    The article says it could result in a fine that’s based on the value of the damage. You’d think having a famous artist’s work would increase the value of the building.

    • 100@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      7 months ago

      would be funny if courts did agree it was net increase to value if they didnt destroy it

      • credo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        So really they devalued public property by destroying his artwork. I say bring the State up on charges.

    • jabjoe@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 months ago

      Interesting. “The value of the damage.” I’d say it’s pretty likely the Banksy worked increased the value of the wall, if not the whole property. So is that negative damage? The people who decreased the value where those who tried to clean off the artwork.

    • HexesofVexes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      So, if the damage increased the value of the building, it would necessitate the courts paying? Sounds reasonable.

    • Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      7 months ago

      Our current government is the labour party, the one of the big two that is supposed to be more left leaning. They haven’t been left leaning in twenty years, they crept to centrist and now the creep to the right continues. They’re not dissimilar from the democrats in America. Internationally, there seems to be a general move towards the right and we are certainly following it. Demonstrations and activism don’t seem to help. Shit is fucked, basically.

      • locahosr443@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        The UK government as effectively ignored all protests since the poll tax riots. The choice seems either start acting like the French or just sit down and shut up.

        • Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          Yeah, and I’ve been on some actions that have kicked off, back in the day, fighting the lines of riot police. It was fun but achieved fuck all. Yeah we need many more people involved in aggressive protests. I don’t know if that will help either, but at least we need to mobilise a broader section of the population.

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    7 months ago

    They’re determined to Streisand Effect this into the history books, huh?

  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    7 months ago

    Could everyone in London just suddenly adopt a fashion trend of wearing V for Vendetta masks?

    … Or is that already illegal?

  • Donebrach@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    7 months ago

    “We must catch this villain who is making public edifices worth millions to our oligarchs!!”

  • heyWhatsay@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    7 months ago

    Could have avoided the higher criminal charges by painting a building across the street, but this does demonstrate the insecurity of authority.

  • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    7 months ago

    Oh no! That is so scary. I hope that whoever it is doesn’t have decades of experience in working and traveling anonymously around the world while performing illegal acts of guerilla artwork while evading both the legal authorities and an adoring public fanbase!

  • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 months ago

    Fuck are you kidding me?

    The plebs are getting rowdy. Surely this will send the message we’re hoping for and they’ll settle down.