• IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    4 months ago

    With my dictatorial powers … my first action would be to seize and outlaw extreme wealth. No one would be allowed to own more than $1 million.

    All the money collected would be used for government and providing a Universal Basic Income for everyone.

    And I’d get a designer to make me a big fancy hat.

  • Skyrmir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    4 months ago

    I could BE a benevolent dictator, I could never BECOME a benevolent dictator. The process of getting there would exclude me, because I would reject the power structure needed to form the dictatorship in the first place.

    • Bunbury@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Same here. Also I don’t think I’d make it long at the top either. I think a certain lack of empathy is required to be ok with some of the requirements of the position.

      • Skyrmir@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I could make the hard choices if needed, once there. Because at that point it’s about what is the greater good. Even if you really can’t say for certain, someone making a bad call is most often better than no one making a decision.

        The problem is that in order to become a benevolent dictator, you have to chose to hurt people that don’t matter to the greater good, or very likely are important to the well being of the population. With the only justification being that maybe by consolidating power you can make the world a better place. And there is just no way to square that circle other than violent narcissism.

        • Bunbury@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          That’s the thing though. I think after acquiring the power you need to keep on stepping on some people to stay in the position. You likely don’t have infinite resources so there’s always going to be someone who missies out. Also what about people meaning to harm you or your subjects?

          • Skyrmir@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Once you’re in power you can rationalize/justify their loss against the greater good that your leadership has brought to the people. There are concrete examples of human progress to defend. If there are significant counter examples, then it’s you that’s the problem to be dealt with, just like any other.

  • lennybird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    4 months ago

    I think there are many people out there who could.

    To me, the problem isn’t being a benevolent dictator; it’s getting a benevolent person there in a benevolent way.

    • Krafty Kactus@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah the problem is mostly that benevolent people don’t actually want to be dictators much less do what it takes to become one.

  • dgmib@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    4 months ago

    No.

    Not because I’m evil, but because I am empathetic and someone evil would absolutely figure out a way to use that to manipulate me.

  • Inucune@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    4 months ago

    I wouldn’t be fucking kids and sending goon squads after minorities and into cities to harass my political opponents if that is what you are asking.

    The ‘not evil’ bar is currently riding on the same high speed train the Republicans put their goalposts on.

  • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I’d like to think so. When we read 1984 in high school, a friend and I were studying together. I remember saying (in my naïveté), “I loved the book and I get the history but why would you want to be in charge of a place that sucks?” She was like, “You’re just going to have to get used to the fact that a lot of people care about power more than beaches.”

    Well, I still think those people are foolish. I’d rather be in charge of my own tiny slice of paradise than rule over some wack ass dictatorship where everyone else is miserable. Not wanting to be in charge is probably the basic pre-requisite for being a benevolent dictator. I like to cook for people and stuff. I’d use my power and wealth to do that.

    That being said, I’m a dirtbag. I’d have a cool house somewhere with mountain and ocean views. Probably 3 or 4 beauty queens who also have Ms. Congeniality pageant sashes who are in charge of laughing at my jokes and charming me. No more than one or two rhythmic gymnastics teams that delight us all by throwing ribbons to each other with their feet. (Other apparatuses are cool too. Hula hoop. Clubs. Ball. Variety is the spice of life.)

  • kittenzrulz123
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 months ago

    I would instantly be assassinated for helping out people too much and handing too much power to workers syndicates

  • Valmond@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 months ago

    No because narcissistic psychopathic yes-men would flood my surroundings and I’d probably quickly become paranoid (with reasons to be that).

    Except if it was in a Douglas Addams way.

  • BigBenis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 months ago

    It is inevitable that an opposition would form against you. You either let the movement continue to gain traction and risk unseating you or you use your power in a corrupt manner to silence them.

    • HasturInYellow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      In this particular case, it depends what you define as corrupt. If you are truly working towards the betterment of everyone under your power (even those that you are fighting against), then what becomes justifiable to that end?

    • Lumisal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Not if you preemptively make what would be an opposition ideology illegal when making the country’s constitution

  • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 months ago

    I don’t think I could become dictator at all, no.

    Seriously, though, power corrupts. I’m not immune. Nor am I immune to being manipulated by those more evil than I, which is another big problem with concentrating power.

  • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 months ago

    Relevant CGP Grey video

    Basically it is a structural problem that ensures corrupt behavior. A dictator has to direct resources to the people most relevant to their continued power to buy their loyalty, and away from everyone else whose support is irrelevant. Not being a scumbag in that position could get you killed.

  • memfree@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 months ago

    Nope. Once you make me dictator, I force a bunch of experts to work out a system of government that will make sure there will be no more dictators after me, and that said government will be obligated to work for the betterment of the populace as a whole without massive disparity. At the same time, I’d hire another bunch of experts to figure out what the first bunch got wrong.

    While those two groups are working, I shall decree that in one month we will start executing billionaires starting with the richest and working our way down – but anyone who donates all their ‘excess’ money to the new government or charities and research that I personally approve of before the deadline gets to live. I’m counting all off-shore money, and any attempt to flee the country shall be met with lethal force.