• AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      Thanks for this link. It’s good analysis. I found the tweet so viscerally offensive that I struggled to articulate the specifics of how it was so fucked, so I appreciate seeing someone break it down.

  • ideonek@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    6 months ago

    Wait, wait… Palestinians are mentioned! When he talks about… shared responsibilities. Never mind, go on.

  • robador51@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    6 months ago

    I take it as the families of Israelis affected by the events of 7 October, and the entirety of the Palestinian Gazan people. How this is dehumanizing language is beyond me tbh.

    • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 months ago

      This tweet is best understood in the context of the consistently biased media coverage that we’ve seen over the last few years, in which Israeli deaths and injuries are covered far more frequently and with more emotive language than those of Palestinians. This is despite the fact that the harm to Palestinians is far larger, both in terms of the brutality inflicted upon civilians, and the scale of deaths. This is a genocide.

      And yes, I’m using the word “Palestinian”, because besides the fact that Palestinians in the West Bank have also been severely affected by this conflict (as well as being systematically oppressed by the apartheid regime even before October 7th), Israeli politicians have made it abundantly clear that complete genocide of Palestinians in their goal.

    • Palestinians have families, and not only Palestinians in Gaza were harmed by the genocide and ethnic cleansing. There were also pogroms in the West Bank. Obama is bothsiding a genocide as if there is any equivalency between the victim and the aggressor.

    • Dreamer@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      Analyzing the bias in BBC reporting in Palestine

      Coverage of Gaza War in the New York Times and Other Major Newspapers Heavily Favored Israel, Analysis Shows

      Western coverage of Gaza: A textbook case of coloniser’s journalism

      If you want more on Bias. Also, let’s make one thing clear: This isn’t a genocide against the Gazan people, it’s a genocide against the Palestinian people. Gazans are Palestinians in diaspora. Israel has been working nonstop to ethnically cleanse all Palestinians in Palestine whether that’s in Gaza, West Bank, or the rest of the occupied territories. Anyone acting like it’s just Gaza or the “Gazans” is part of the problem. It might seem pendantic, but it’s too late for some half-assed lip service bullshit, especially from those that have been complicit, enablers, and the primary drivers of this genocide and oppression 100 years in the making.

  • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 months ago

    Oh man. I’m pretty sure “genocide studies” classes aren’t going to be talking about Obama.

    Bothsidesing indeed.

  • Ging@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m kinda hearing the critique, but also can’t think of what he could say that would please the critics here

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      6 months ago

      Calling it a genocide would be nice. The UN used the term. Everyone in power is scared to say it because of the legal obligations involved.

    • Whostosay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      6 months ago

      Here’s an option.

      “We must end this genocide, and stopping any and all funds to Israel, coupled with heavy sanctions and the threat of war is a great start.”

      Look how concise it could be.

    • eldavi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 months ago

      it’s so annoying when critics complain of annoying things like genocide and ethnic cleansing; ugh.

    • Caro S.@todon.eu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      @Ging Maybe reconsider that “anarchist” when you’re defending imperialist propaganda with that “imperialist Obama can’t please the critics here.”

      @DropBear

      • Ging@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’m sorry you interpreted my comment as ‘defending imperialist propaganda’. I’ll remove the comment if it brings you peace. I’m also kinda confused how ‘anarchists’ got dragged into this as well

  • Ultraword@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Yes, Obama was an horrible leftist that pushed the needle far. Finally people are waking up to the damage he did while in office.

  • Serinus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Yes, he has a responsibility to both side a conflict as a diplomat trying to maintain influence with Israel, the side that has all the power.

    Civilians are always hostages. It’d be more reasonable to call the Palestinians being held hostages than to call the Israeli hostages “prisoners of war”. There’s also clearly more of a delineation between the IDF and the Israeli civilians than there is in the Gaza populace and the “fighters”. Partly because Israelis are the aggressors, of course.

    He can’t be a person who just rages on social media about it if he wants the best outcome.

    You can definitely argue that this is caving to Israel. He’s literally being the definition of the word “diplomatic”.