• Zagorath@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    ·
    2 months ago

    0 Kelvin = 0 Rankine

    Also, both °R and °Ra are Rankine. So 3 of the 5 people in the bottom picture also agree.

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Hmm. To my eye, K is obviously pointing at either R or Ra (and F), R has to be pointing at Ra (and K or F), and Ra is pointing at R or K (and C).

        • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          K is obviously pointing at R because Rankine is an abomination in the same vein as pound-mole and thousands of an inch.

          Motherfuckers, metric is right there, get your disgusting units out of here.

          Anyone who uses either of these units in the last 40 or 50 years, I would like to physically fight with you. I have never thrown hands.

    • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      2 months ago

      Er… every system of measurement is accurate, tautologically.

      0°F = 0°F because 0°F = 0°F, by definition.

      • marcos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        I dunno. I wouldn’t be surprised if somebody took the time to invent fuzzy measurement unities.

      • DacoTaco@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        I wouldnt call farenheit accurate, but these days it is because its a static number in celcius, which is also an accurate and static measurement that can be repeated billions of times.
        Not because 0 is 0 :p
        In the original farenheit definition my 0 farenheit was not your 0 farenheit hehe

        • Zombie-Mantis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Maybe in some scientific settings, but nowhere else. Why would it be logical to use a temperature system in every-day life who’s base is set to a temperature that doesn’t exist on Earth? Celsius and Fahrenheit are human-scale measurements, useful in daily applications. Celsius is a bit more logic-y, and Fahrenheit is intuitive.

      • applebusch
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Only Kelvin is valid thermodynamically because thermodynamics often needs absolute temperature for the math to work out right. Rankine is only for masochistic idiots who like fucking up their math and having extra stupid constants all over the place to compensate for their shitty unit system.

        • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Perhaps, but that was not the statement. The statement was:

          Kelvin is objectively the most accurate.

          Functionally, a measurement system cannot be inaccurate. You might define a new temperature measurement in blargs, and define that the room you’re in right now is 1 blarg. It is now an accurate statement to say that the room is 1 blarg. At the time of measurement, it is not possible for that statement to be inaccurate.

    • Frezik
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      They’re both calibrated against a stupid wet molecule that carbon based life on this planet is addicted to.

      Introducing: the Nihon. 0Nh is the freezing point of Nihonium at 1 bar pressure, and 100Nh is the boiling point. Well, theoretical freezing and boiling points. Nihonium is one of those elements that doesn’t stick around long enough to be studied. But we thought really hard about it, did some shit with particle accelerators, and we’re pretty sure these numbers are good.

      • FiskFisk33@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        The bar is defined to be close to the atmospheric pressure of one random planet called earth, why choose that as your pressure unit?

    • awful_neutral
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s a nice day today. Can’t be more than 300 degrees

      I’m not so sure

    • warm@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m coping, Celsius is just as accurate as Kelvin, because it based on it.

      Kelvin - 273.15 = Celsius

    • madjo@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Depends on your measuring tool. A thermometer that measures in K but has an error margin of +2 to -2 K is less accurate than a thermometer that measures in F and has an error margin van -0.1 and +0.1 F

  • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    Fahrenheit is vibe temperature. It just feels good use bigger numbers to describe being very hot. “It’s 30 degrees outside” sounds hot but “it’s 100 degrees outside” is more expressive, like built in exaggeration. That could be why it is preferred by Americans.

    • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      No, it’s just because the US never really converted to the metric system. Degrees Fahrenheit are zeroed at the freezing temperature of brine, and there are exactly 180 degrees from freezing to boiling water because that was an easy number to divide (like the 360 degrees in a circle).

    • warm@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      Farenheit isnt a vibe temperature, its just a bullshit unit of measurment that stuck around in the US.

      If you wanted a vibe temperature, why not have 0 be comfortable room temperature and then negatives be colder and positives be warmer?

      Or just use Celsius like the rest of the world.

    • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      This is an argument that gets rolled out a lot but the argument is also based on vibes.

      Celcius having zero at freeing is actually useful with weather.

      100 being boiling, is also nice for cooking.

      The rest is arbitrary, and cope from US customary users who can’t accept that metric is the same or better in every single way.

  • Iron Lynx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    there’s a whole host of temperature scales, some of which look similar, some look different, some scale the same at the same temperature difference but have different zeroes, and at least one works backwards. Thank goodness there’s only three you’re likely to see in the wild these days, I’d hate to have to keep in mind whether or not those degrees are not Celsius or Fahreheit, but… idk, Newton? Réamur? Rømer? Delisle?