• WanderingThoughts@europe.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    2 months ago

    My neighbor tried to raise some turkeys for Christmas. Those were bred to grow really quickly but his timing was off. They have to be slaughtered within a small window before they get too fat and their hearts give out. He had to do an early Christmas.

    • ranzispa@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Don’t know about the small window thing. We had turkeys for a while, but to be fair it was more about domestic animals than food source. Those things would get huge. I remember once some friends were coming to visit at night and seeing them on the roof got scared and ran off.

      • Gladaed@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        In the Turkish diaspora they are used as a dog whistle for Turkish nationalist. Good dog whistle too. You don’t hear it.

      • hayvan@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yes they are. It’s a bunch of armchair political experts confidently talking out of their buttholes.

        There IS a racist political movement, which is often referred as Grey Wolves abroad who think they own the symbol, but leaving an ancient cultural story to a bunch of fucks is the stupidest thing ever. This is the same level of stupid as saying Pepe the Frog is a white supremacist symbol.

        • Ygest Wefsid@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 months ago

          Ah so this is about an organization named “grey wolves” known for their hostile worldviews, not the grey wolf from the historical tale about a she-wolf raising a human children? This could have been elaborated better.

    • Bababasti@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      You‘re getting downvoted but I agree with you. The joke in the image is funny, but the presence of these grey wolve emojis suggests affiliation with the Grey Wolves which are fascist. No debating that, I don’t get the other comments here.

      • hayvan@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        No they are not right. I can’t know the political views of someone in some shitpost, but the original grey wolf symbolim comes from Turkic mythology, which is today being co-opted by racist fucks. It still gets used ironically to make fun of those fucks (just like posting Musk’s Nazi salute doesn’t automatically make you a nazi if you are making fun of him).

        In addition, some people want to reclaim the symbolism, because it’s ancient mythology, why would we leave it to them, right?

        • Bababasti@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          It still gets used ironically to make fun of those fucks (just like posting Musk’s Nazi salute doesn’t automatically make you a nazi if you are making fun of him)

          I agree with you there, but it’s hard to tell in a shitpost like this. So when in doubt rather avoid putting fascist ideology out there.

          In addition, some people want to reclaim the symbolism, because it’s ancient mythology, why would we leave it to them, right?

          The Nazis also didn’t invent the Swastika, it’s on a lot of temples in Asia. You don’t see me reclaiming it when I convert to Buddhism. Some symbols are just tainted. It sounds like giving in to far right trolls, but I’d rather spend my energy on worthwhile struggles.

    • Jankatarch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s more like fascists trying to steal a symbol ngl.

      Like highschoolers will have a phase where they use a wolf pfp online and talk about how they wished they were a horse archer for example.

      Not necessarily politics. The party “gray wolves” on the other hand is fucking openly fascist.

    • Teppichbrand@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 months ago

      Vegan Bullshit Bingo #22

      Plants have feelings too

      No, they do not. There is no serious study to suggest that they do. Plants do not have a brain or central nervous system. At most, they respond to stimuli. If you really care that much about the welfare of plants, you should go vegan, since many more plants “die” for animal feeding.
      Do you feel bad while mowing your lawn? And would you rather rescue a potted plant than a dog from a burning house? Is docking pig tails the same as branch trimming to you? Question upon question…

      • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        What part of “Tough shit, I am hungry” made you think I care about the desires of the plant?

      • madjo@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        Plants communicate.

        Those tears you shed when cutting onions is because of a defence mechanism of the onion, the scent you smell when cutting grass is another.

        We also know that fungi and trees communicate with eachother as well. They even help eachother gain nutrients.

        • Teppichbrand@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Yeah, agreed. Life wants to live. Pain and fear is something animals feel so they can get away from potential harm. If you’re immobile like a plant, it doesn’t make sense to feel pain because you can’t run. You don’t need to have a brain nor a central nervous system to deal with that.
          70% of global crops are fed to animals. Stop eating animals and grow forests instead, to make our planet healthier.

          • x4740N@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            More greenwashing

            I’m surprised how much lemmy lets vegans get away with the greenwashing stuff

          • hans@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            70% of global crops are fed to animals.

            no, they’re not. why would you lie about something so easy to find the truth?

          • SippyCup@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            It’s closer to 30%.

            About 80% of the biomass of the food grown for human consumption is fed to livestock as well. That may be where you’re getting that number? That’s being insanely generous. What we’re talking about is like, corn stalks, squash vines, that kind of shit. The parts of the plants humans cannot physically eat but none the less must produce to feed ourselves.

            I’m sure the irony of your bullshit bingo card is completely lost on you but you haven’t said anything that strictly speaking could be interpreted as true in this thread.

        • prole
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          That doesn’t mean they’re sentient though, those are just chemical signals

      • hans@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        to the extent that they don’t understand that they themselves might die, plants don’t want too be eaten any more than they want to keep living. the same is true for animals

        • Gladaed@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Not all animals are the same. Killing an endangered dolphin weighs much different to eating a mussel.

          • theolodis@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            So you’d recommend only eating animals until they are endangered and then eating other animals until they are no longer? Is that what you want to express?

            Or are you arguing that some animals are more sentient than others (e.g. mammals vs mussels), and we should switch to eating snails and mussels only, because of that?

            • Gladaed@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Just saying their figure is completely irrelevant since not all are created equally.

              We should probably substitute meat by eating more mollusks. They are rather eco friendly. And insects, probably.

              A chicken is also much smaller than a cow.

              • theolodis@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                A chicken is also much smaller than a cow.

                Your penis is also much smaller than a cow, or a chicken. Should we all start eating your dick? Seems like size does matter indeed.

                • Gladaed@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I didn’t say which one is better choice. Killing cows may be preferential as fewer beings have to exist and extinction is preferable. Or you use another metric. I don’t care. Just be consistent and sensible in your arguments.

      • Artemis_Mystique@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Plants that humans wouldnt be able to digest efficiently anyway, unlesss you are talking about the more bourgeois meats

          • x4740N@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            You do realise it’s waste product not suitable for human consumption

            For example waste spy product from the production of your soy milk which also uses a ton of water and drives deforestation

            The farms also kill farm pests with use of farming machines, pesticides and shotguns

          • hans@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            people don’t want to eat field corn, but the soy that is given to livestock is mostly the waste product from pressing soybeans for oil

            • theolodis@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              According to the Soy bean producers of North Carolina, the soymeal is a by product of the soy oil production, where a small portion is used for Tofu and Soy milk and the majority becomes animal feed: https://ncsoy.org/media-resources/uses-of-soybeans/

              So all of the soy protein given to animals would indeed be digestible by humans.

              Concerning the corn, we could just plant sweet corn instead, or any other plant really. Or what would prevent us from doing that?

      • hans@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        none. not really. if we are using it, it’s not wasted, and much of what we feed livestock is plants or parts of plants that people can’t or won’t eat

        • theolodis@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          According to the Soy bean producers of North Carolina, the soymeal is a by product of the soy oil production, where a small portion is used for Tofu and Soy milk and the majority becomes animal feed: https://ncsoy.org/media-resources/uses-of-soybeans/

          So all of the soy protein given to animals would indeed be digestible by humans.

          Now it might be true that a lot of people don’t want to eat Tofu Tempe and Soy milk, but we could as well plant any other vegetable instead of Soy beans, and who could resist some delicious Brussel sprouts for example???

            • theolodis@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Well, in that case we could just mix the soy protein in other foods, I guess.

              But I’d also suspect that we wouldn’t need the quantities of soy oil, and we just use that because of the synergy with the livestock food.

              • hans@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                we already feed people soy. but we make a lot more than people want to eat. feeding it to livestock is a conservation of resources

                • theolodis@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  How is converting it to animal protein with a factor of at best 10:1 conservation of resources? Conservation of resources would be to produce less, and also produce less livestock.

      • x4740N@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Wanna know how many of those plants are waste product only and plants only suitable for animal consumption

        Do you see a human eating hay

        Cut the greenwashing crap

    • markovs_gun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      Some do, actually. Most plants that taste good basically rely on being eaten as part of their reproductive cycle.

  • madjo@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    Has PETA ever asked lettuce if it gave consent to being eaten?

    I mean, I’m all for a decreased consumption of meat, but PETA’s methods don’t work.

  • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    As a vegetarian who mostly eats vegan, why is it that I find PETA so annoying?

    Without looking into it further, I’m gonna guess the same reason I find a lot of people I agree with on a number of issues so insufferable: holier-than-thou, self-congratulatory, moral crusading.

    Just existing and being willing to answer people’s questions genuinely is way more effective. I literally never bring it up, people only find out by happenstance and often ask about it themselves. If they don’t, it’s not that interesting (in my opinion).

    Anecdotally, anyway.

    • no banana@piefed.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      I mean, people who you believe to be morally right can still be irritating idiots. I’m not a vegan, but I get it. I have friends who are, I don’t say no to a vegan meal (unless there’s corn in it because that gives me an unpleasant time on the toilet). I do think PETA is fighting for something they believe in, and I think that’s admirable. I also think they’re annoying.

      • buttnugget@lemmy.worldBanned
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Their tactics can be annoying and ridiculous, but I think that any honest assessment of why people generally find them annoying would admit that it’s people being reactionary. The whole “How do you know someone’s a vegan? Don’t worry, they’ll tell you” is almost the exact opposite in reality: people can’t shut up about NOT being vegan.

        • no banana@piefed.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          There’s truth in that for sure. I see it as a human thing, not a vegan/non-vegan one. We just love to be correct.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      As a vegetarian who mostly eats vegan, why is it that I find PETA so annoying?

      Because they are terrorists.

      They fund other terrorists

      They kidnap and kill animals from loving homes.

      they “adopt” animals and immediately euthanize them.

      Often dumping the bodies from both into random dumpsters, when their enormous corpse freezer is full.

      They love putting naked women on display in cages and various other clearly fetishistic scenes.

      They are a group of extremists who do nothing but harm animal rights by their sheer existence and association with the subject.

  • BluJay320
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    If they didn’t want to be eaten, they shouldn’t have been made of food ¯_(ツ)_/¯

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Genuinely shocked that no one drew a picture of a turkey with legs spread saying “I want to be eaten, Daddy” in reply to this.

    • Jankatarch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Meh it’s more equivalent to something like cowboys in the west.

      Like yeah far-right likes to use them for ads and pretend it’s their symbol but when Japanese spiderman show has a cowboy with skates it isn’t referencing “American far-right.”

      • Kyden Fumofly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        The Grey Wolves officially known by the short name Idealist Hearths , is a Turkish far-right political movement and the youth wing of the Nationalist Movement Party (MHP). Commonly described as ultranationalist, neo-fascist, Islamo-nationalist (sometimes secular), and racist, the Grey Wolves have been described by some scholars, journalists, and governments as a death squad and a terrorist organization. Its members deny its political nature and claim it to be a cultural and educational foundation, citing its full official name: Idealist Hearths Educational and Cultural Foundation.

        Maybe many use the symbol and they don’t know what it represents, but i don’t take it as an excuse. Same goes with many other fascist symbols.