• Pirtatogna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    It’s basically an abysmal text editor combined with the worst page layout software the world has ever seen. Creating documents with it very much resembles masturbating with a blender.

    • Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      12 days ago

      I used LibreOffice Writer for my coursework the past semester, and when I used my spouse’s Windows computer to double check the images were correctly placed before submitting a paper they were on completely different pages. This was when I saved it as a .docx, because the only two options accepted were .docx or pdf. I wound up doing everything as a pdf if I needed images, but I think LibreOffice doesn’t have a save as pdf option? Or if it did I missed it, I just used Google Docs to save it as a pdf.

      • Microw@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Submitting anything as an editable format like docx or odt is a bad idea. The moment a document is finished and I give it out of my hands, I turn it into an pdf.

      • bufalo1973@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        12 days ago

        LibreOffice has a native export to PDF. And, if you use (almost) any Linux, you have a PDF printer included.

        • CannedYeet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          11 days ago

          Even better, you can create a “Hybrid PDF” which embeds a second copy of the file in ODT format inside the PDF. This makes it re-editable.

          Word supports ODT but it doesn’t support reading these ODT files embedded in PDFs though.

        • Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          12 days ago

          I am on Linux but haven’t needed to use office software in nearly 20 years, how do you access the pdf printer? Is that different from saving as a pdf through the menu?

          Edit: thanks for the help everyone!

          • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            21
            ·
            12 days ago

            You literally ‘print’ to pdf. Instead of a physical page appearing from the demon box, it will give you a prompt of where to ‘print’ your file. Windows has it too, though I always use the pdf export and not the print. But in a pinch it’s good.

            • bountygiver [any]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              11 days ago

              export is typically better as it preserve selectable text, if you print as pdf it will be as flat as a real paper (modern readers will still let you select text but you will be prone to any errors the text recognition can make)

          • exu@feditown.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            12 days ago

            You hit print and select the PDF output. It probably works everywhere you can select a printer.

            Windows also has that, but you have to navigate your way out of OneDrive folders.

          • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            12 days ago

            The PDF printer would be accessed via the Print functionality. It’s a virtual device that renders output to a file instead of a physical printer.

      • 0x0@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        You can export to pdf and the hiccup you encountered is M$ intentionally not following their own format.

    • skisnow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      12 days ago

      LibreOffice is as good as Word. Which sadly means there are still no really good document editors out there.

    • other_cat@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 days ago

      I’ve been enjoying OnlyOffice myself! (LibreOffice is fine, I just like the UI of OnlyOffice more.)

    • plateee@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 days ago

      It’s $150 for a “perpetual” license - but that’s not including any one drive storage. The Office 365 SaaS (I think now it’s Microsoft 365?) starts at $99/year.

      I know this because I’ve been trying to find a solution for my sister who absolutely needs office to get a workable solution for Linux. Supposedly, she has to submit papers/writing as docx and can’t trust LibreOffice not to fuck up formatting.

  • lime!@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    12 days ago

    expecting word to edit pdfs is like expecting excel to edit compiled matlab programs

    • anosym@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      12 days ago

      Also I don’t see the problem with the other two.
      Move image? Works fine if you select the right wrapping.
      Ignore spelling mistake? Right click -> ignore once / ignore all / add to dictionary

      • arudesalad@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        12 days ago

        From my experience with word, ignore spelling mistake is a lie, it always starts complaining again eventually (and changing spelling from us to uk almost never works)

    • red_bull_of_juarez@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      12 days ago

      I think from an end-user perspective it’s realistic to expect Word to edit PDFs. It’s just that the PDF format is an unbelievably complex clusterfuck and thus requires an entirely separate and expensive program.

      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        i mean, it’s equivalent to using a typewriter to edit a printed page. pdf was not designed to be edited.

          • lime!@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            because people who don’t know computers can’t learn to use the right file format.

            pdf is a container format for code that is run by printers. it’s not something that can be easily changed. pdf editors are hacks upon hacks upon hacks.

  • CaptainPedantic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    12 days ago

    I got so frustrated trying to use Word to write a document at work that I just gave up and wrote the whole damn thing in LaTeX. Lots of nested bulleted lists (or worse, numbered lists) and Word do not play nicely.

    Sucks to be the guy who has to edit it when I’m gone.

    • jambudz@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 days ago

      I wrote things in a community college class in latex and they made me resubmit in word because their anti cheat software couldn’t read pdfs. Upsetting. I was 30. I’m not cheating on a heavily sourced psych paper.

    • Aljernon@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      12 days ago

      I feel like Microsoft products steadily get worse over time. It’s like they spend money to have their programmers seen how bad a product gets before people will get fed up and dump it.

      • Samskara@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 days ago

        Microsoft products can be quite good, but you’re right that they are severely hampered by boneheaded decisions.

        Microsoft Office is still very good overall. Definitely one of Microsoft’s better products. The ribbon UI was revolutionary and is still great.

        The Mac version of Microsoft Office is also a good example of how good and bad versions alternate. Office for Mac 98 was terrible. Office for Mac 2004 was great and and in many ways better than the windows version. 2008 dropped support for Visual Basic. 2011 reintroduced it. Microsoft’s email client for the Mac changed between Outlook, Entourage, then Outlook again with various changes and supporting different features.

        My favorite versions of Microsoft operating systems are: DOS 5, Windows 3.1, NT 4, 98, XP, 7, 10, Phone 8.

        I’m still mad Microsoft canceled their fantastic flight simulator.

    • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 days ago

      That was my first thought too. Somehow they seem to be able to make the shittiest possible version of everything they attempt, and yet it almost always becomes the standard that everyone uses.

  • otacon239@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    12 days ago

    TGFM - Thank God for Markdown

    Seriously, though. 9 times out of 10, markdown has all the formatting I need for the task at hand. On the rare occasion I need something more, I’m glad I have access to Apple Pages, but it comes with its own set of unique challenges.

    • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      12 days ago

      I miss the Steve Jobs era of iWork.

      I won’t say it was the best (why were there no pivot tables in numbers?? And why is the current implementation shit requiring manual refreshes that you can’t rely on?), but the software worked very uniformly and was straight forward.

      If he hadn’t died he would still be yelling at them to make keynote and numbers work, and he probably wouldn’t have missed the collaborative editing boat.

      iWeb was pretty sweet too.

  • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    11 days ago

    Want to edit the header just on page 6? Or feel like being sexy and having a single page in landscape or a different size?

    Easy! Just make a bunch of separate documents, export them as PDFs, and merge them in Adobe Acrobat.

    • Soleos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 days ago

      I agree lots of things about word sucks. But FYI single page landscape is achieved by using two section breaks. It’s not ideal, but its somewhat understandable given how styles are prioritized. I’ve tried others that work well, but they also suffer on things that word does well that we take for granted.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 days ago

        The way it should be handled is to just let me rotate a single fucking page. It’s 2025 and there is zero excuse for that bullshit.

    • Rooster326@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      You using complex file formats for vendor lock in

      Me using complex file formats because my code base is shite.

      We are not the same

  • Sharlot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    11 days ago

    The real miracle isn’t Word’s features, it’s how it’s still the default after decades of collective pain.

  • GreenShimada@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    12 days ago

    As someone that recalls using Word 5.5 in DOS for a book report in 5th grade, as with all things, the peak has come and gone.

    IMO, the enshittification curve started about 2010ish when MS demanded internet connectivity for features that didn’t work. Saving PDFs was its peak. RIP Word 2007, which I used well into 2015.