• turboSnail@piefed.europe.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          8 days ago

          Phew. Picked my instance based on vibes alone, but it turned out good anyway. Didn’t even know about the speed ratings.

        • Zombie@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          8 days ago

          But lightning is faster than rockets… What? This doesn’t make any sense at all!

          • ageedizzle@piefed.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            That kinda makes sense. Lightening travels at the speed of light. Can’t get much faster than that

        • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Hm, I wouldn’t have known rocket is faster, since lightning is instantaneous in real life.

          Perhaps a speedometer at different speeds and color chunks (low adds first 3rd is filled green, medium adds yellow to the next 3rd, fast adds red to last chunk) would be more intuitive? Though that could also be interpreted as server capacity if the word speed isn’t next to the icon. Maybe a little icon legend somewhere nearby could help, or a question mark sign next to the speed icon that explains what it is?

      • Rimu@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        8 days ago

        It’s not a technical stability we’re talking about there - it’s more human. Number of admins with SSH access, whether there are donations coming in, if there are daily backups.

        Sorry, all this is undocumented.

        • Ada@piefed.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          8 days ago

          I’m guessing it’s because we fund our instances out of our own pockets, and donations don’t cover the entire cost? If you’re looking for future improvement ideas, I’d much rather that information be exposed directly, than the word “stability” which implies we have uptime issues

          • Rimu@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            8 days ago

            Yes I’d be happy to find a better word for it. Although, with low social stability eventually there will be 0% uptime so they are related.

            • Ada@piefed.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              8 days ago

              Although, with low social stability eventually there will be 0% uptime so they are related.

              I think that’s a bit harsh. As it is, Kaity and I would both have to get hit by buses for us to lose the ability to fund our instances. We’re both well in to our careers, with sufficient earning power to cover the finances. We would both have to lose our incomes for the long term, before the site itself became threatened. Long enough to ask for community funding if it came to that.

              In real world terms, we’ve been hosting fediverse instances out of our own pocket for over 3 years now, which is a time period few fediverse instances can match, and even fewer threadiverse instances.

              Which is to say, I think our social stability is pretty reasonable by fediverse standards. There absolutely are instances out there with higher levels of social stability, but that’s not because they have more community funding, it’s because they have more users and more admins, which also comes with requisite organisational structures that lets them run their instances without any individual admins being the point of failure.

              • Rimu@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                8 days ago

                The intent of that checkbox in the instance chooser settings is really about gauging financial stability. So for people in your position donations from users don’t matter so much and you could just tick it. I’m not auditing anyone!

              • Rimu@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                8 days ago

                Yes, this isn’t a personal judgement about your particular circumstances. The instance chooser embeds assumptions about what tends to happen on average. As such it can never fully represent every situation.

      • Egonallanon@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 days ago

        Anything less than 5 9’s of uptime indicates a lack of commitment.

        Please do not ask about the uptime of my self hosted services.

  • bibbasa@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    8 days ago

    eyyy, i’m one of those. long time mastodon user, but was always intimidated by lemmy, piefed seems a lot more friendly.

  • biltong@piefed.co.zaOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    8 days ago

    I wish there was an option for the graph to start at zero. Graphs like this can be misleading.

  • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    8 days ago

    Where’s the increase coming from? Users changing from Lemmy or new users to the theadiverse? (I fucking hate that word)

  • Flames5123@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    8 days ago

    Let’s see if piefed is as open as it claims to be. The creator and maintainer actually injects their own opinion into the source code. There are so many deny lists and a social score built into the system.

    Piefed is great at putting in new features and making everything pretty. But it’s so opinionated, you’re better off on Reddit, imo.

    Source: https://lemmy.ml/comment/23662293

    • Hell_nah_brother@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      Piefed is clearly an honeypot, you need to have severe brain injury to not understand it.

      “ah…i cant wait to have my hidden social score, let’s join this unknown pit of shite.” -not a cop

    • Skavau@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      8 days ago

      Almost all of these are able to be turned off.

      By “social credit” you just mean a toned down version of Reddits karma (that doesn’t track positive score)?

      • Flames5123@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 days ago

        No, like posting a gif leads you to have -1 social score, hidden, because you posted a gif. There’s so many opinions in the code.

        • Snoopy@tarte.nuage-libre.frM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          You have point but on the other side, its goal is to avoid karma farming and help mods, admins for creating a serene place for discussion.

          There is two distinct score : reputation, attitude.

          • Reputation is people’s reaction to your comment and post.
          • attitude is how you vote. If you do mass downvote, your ability to downvote is removed until you reach a balance between upvote/downvote.

          When we post a gif, and everyone laugh, it’s easy to get a good reputation whereas elsewhere, i might post several terrible comments. That’s why posting gif doesn’t credit you reputation. You can’t use gif to bypass bad comment and get a good reputation.

          That’s why it works like that.

    • IEatDaFeesh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 days ago

      Personally I’m fine with a comment getting removed if all they replied with is “this.” Sure that’s opinionated, but it’s a good opinion.

    • Snoopy@tarte.nuage-libre.frM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      I’m now intervening as a mod. The povokative passive-aggressive tone you used is a big no.

      Please, can you edit your comment and just tell us that you disagree with the score system and remove your source and reddit part ?

      Maybe you wanted to see your post removed for proving your point even futher as “See ? Piefed’s staff censorship ideas they doesn’t agree.”

      I went to the your gif and read comments : you won’t see that kind of content here. I also asked users to edit their comment, here, when they critized lemmy and i expect you to do the same.

      Our goal, is to create a serene space for discussion. Nothing more.

      Yes, i disagree with lemmy dev’s political opinions but that’s not the main reason we enjoy Piefed. And when Nutomic asked me to share lemmy contact and documentation in iceshrimp dev’s channel, i helped him. :)

      Let’s go back to your post :

      • The beggining is aggressive. Are you testing if Piefed is open ?
      • The meme link. We are from various countries, so the american flag…
      • opiniated ? A software isn’t neutral, it follows our ideas. For example i enjoy the rational discourse toolkit. :)
      • Reddit, was it necessary ? Last time i went there, i was surprised by the huge amount of bots and ads…we are better of on the fediverse, don’t you think ?

      You can disagree with the score system, the no federated vote…and explain your point, why this and that…but not the way you did.

      So please edit your comment and remove those above part

      Users can choose what they prefer :

      • the way communities are moderated and managed
      • their software and its features, ui…

      And i’m happy for them they can choose their favorite pie. If you prefer Lemmy, that’s great. :)

      • Flames5123@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 days ago

        I cannot use a tone via text easily: see Poe’s law. It was meant to be informative and sort of speculative to the future of Piefed. I was happy when Piefed came around but this changed my view a little. I want all federation to succeed but having these things be embedded in the code and not flags to set (even though you can turn most off) just strikes me as concerning. I’m glad users have choices though, but we will still call out bad choices, as many do when calling out shitty instances like hexbear or .ml.

        I will not remove the source and my opinion on it. I’ve been nothing but civil and understanding in the replies to my post and it’s clear it’s an opinion with using “imo”.

        • Snoopy@tarte.nuage-libre.frM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          Your “source” is not a source of information : It is a meme. It doesn’t create the conditions for discussion and debate. A meme doesn’t invite people to share their thinking, people react.

          That’s quite different from someone explaining that Piefed has a set of rules that rate our behaviour. The mood and reaction is quite different from there. Do you notice it ?

          No, i’m not asking you to remove your opinion that you disagree with piefed score. I never told you that. I’m asking you to rewrite your post and create a proper space for discussion. And i explained why above…

          • Flames5123@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            Oh I see your issue. You thought I was linking the meme post, not the comment. Look at the comment I linked. That’s my source. I don’t give a crap about the meme, but the comment is a deep dive into the source code.

          • Flames5123@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 days ago

            I have already had a proper space for discussion. I’ve been civil in the replies. This is crazy to even be arguing about. If it’s a meme, why do you care? Are we to just discuss and bicker on the internet or create a better space?

            Remove it if you want for not conforming to your rules of speech. I’m done.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 days ago

    Every time I hear “censorship” cried in relation to piefed, I think of the same cries with Voat, another Reddit clone/refuge. It never compromised on that.

    And it turned into a (now long dead) toxic wasteland. As that ethos smothered all the interesting niche communities.

    IMO, the #1 Fediverse dev priority should be UX that discourages toxicity. That’s what will keep it alive. A militantly, forcibly “unbiased” UX is a quaint old internet ideal, yet it always seems to snowball into an unsustainable toxic monoculture.

    So, if piefed uses “opinionated” defaults to stave that off, good.

    • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      8 days ago

      Piefed is a different reddit-like software that federates with Lemmy. It’s a different take on the same thing that Lemmy is providing, but still compatible with everything, so a piefed user can see and respond to your comment even if you’re on Lemmy.

      Piefed also has some neat features unique to it, such as:

      • a very nice gallery view for image heavy communities.
      • the ability to combine comments from multiple communities under one post, if the same link was posted to all of them. You can see an example of that here (notice how the comments have dividers for each community).
      • the ability to create and subscribe to a pre-made list of communities, sorta like a multi-reddit.
    • core
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      lemmy with extra censorship tools