• floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    3 days ago

    It doesn’t say what they’re planning to do about laws requiring age verification. It says they’re forming a group to figure that out. The problem with bad legislation is you can’t just ignore it, so they need to at least work out an approach. In itself this news is neutral, but we’ll have to see what they decide.

  • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 days ago

    So, they are basically announcing that they are

    forming a committee

    to figure out

    how to talk about

    how to understand the stuff?

    …Honestly, it could have been a lot worse.

  • Cantaloupe@fedioasis.cc
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    When you get big enough, you are under more scrutiny and these laws are spreading more and more. I can imagine the Mastodon team is under lots of external pressure to start following these new laws. Mastodon won’t be the last to start thinking about implementation.

    I hope it’s face verification so I can just point the camera at a guy on Google images or whatever to get it to let me in.

  • moroninahurry@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    Could it be best way to provide legal liability for how to comply with vague and easy to misinterpret badly-written law is to have a process underway at your organization to examine it? Just move slowly till the bigger guys lawyers figure it out?

  • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    This is a real leopards ate MY face?!? moment for much of the fediverse.

    Yeah turns out there are consequences to rightously bandwagoning on moral panics…