• XLE@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    170
    ·
    4 months ago

    These systems are able to navigate complex landscapes on their own, alert authorities about security threats, and can provide around-the-clock video surveillance.

    If only there was a cheaper way to provide around-the-clock video surveillance. Alas, we don’t have the technology.

  • OwOarchist@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Ah, lovely. I see that one Black Mirror episode is taking another step toward being reality.

    • glibg@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      4 months ago

      Snare one, wrap it in some kind of faraday bag, then disassemble it and resell the parts. Or befriend it and play Frisbee together.

        • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          I mean, that won’t really work. It dampens the signal, not eliminates it, and in order to block communications, you need a net width small enough to block 1/4 wavelength which is 5cm/4, so <1 cm holes with a material thick enough for the damping.

          That would be a net that weighs like 20kg lol and it would essentially be a solid cage at that point

          Not to mention that it would have to fully encompass them.

          Better to just use a signal jammer like they do for drones.

      • redsand@infosec.pubBanned
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        A half cube metal shipping container could very easily be modified to work as a faraday cage. Or even a Trash cash.

      • Luminous5481 "Enemy of the State"@anarchist.nexusBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        You didn’t even need to do that. You can pull the battery packs off pretty easily. These are very easy to disable, and due to the fact they aren’t nimble, they can’t get away from you.

    • arcine@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Hunting them for sport must be fun, and there is zero guilt unlike regular hunting ! I bet they are extremely vulnerable to pit traps 😁 just hide the hole under a tarp and watch em fall !

  • Damage@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    4 months ago

    So if we raid a data center, besides RAM we get free robot dogs? Sweet.

  • nshibj@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    4 months ago

    guarding some of the country’s biggest data centers

    The country, ah yes the only place that exists on the internet, the almighty one powerful country to rule them all. THE. COUNTRY.

  • org@lemmy.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    4 months ago

    Think hiding in a big box and walking slowly would trick it?

  • PlaidBaron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    4 months ago

    So a robot you can kick over is better than dogs with actual teeth? Its a good thing tech bros are dumb as fuck.

    • Logical@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 months ago

      Well you can’t attach a machine gun to a dog with teeth. I mean you can, but it won’t hit anything.

    • backalleycoyote@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      On the bright side, robot dogs don’t die when the pig they’re assigned to leaves them in a hot car. Also, nobody cares if a robot dog gets shot/stabbed/kicked.

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I understand the sentiment, although annoyingly enough Boston Dynamics kicks their “dogs” pretty often, and they’re build to adjust their balance very quickly.

    • HertzDentalBar
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Shhhh fuckers gonna take that idea and run with it. AI powered deer bots.

  • Jiral@lemmy.orgBanned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    4 months ago

    Wouldn’t it be cheaper to pay vastly more versatile human guards a decent wage to guard those or more of those instead of those robots?

    • HertzDentalBar
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      4 months ago

      Basically yea, you’re paying a guard at most 45k a year in most places. I highly doubt these fucking things will last 4 years without major maintenance which will probably cost a month or two of a guards wages. So long term it costs far more compared to wages, but when you factor in labour laws and insurance it’s probably still cheaper to just hire people.

        • ViceroTempus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          It’s only a matter of time till “birds aren’t real” isn’t satire. I for one welcome our new robot overlords

          spoiler

          right into a pile of magnets

          .

    • Soup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 months ago

      Pay a person?? Give a real human being money?!?

      These people would rather burn a million dollars in front of a homeless person than give that person $1,000. It’s extra cruel when you realize that society would make that $1,000 back and then some if it were to help that person escape their poverty cycle.

    • moustachio@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      They might be genuinely concerned about the working class revolting against them and are looking for ways to protect their assets without the peasant class involvement

    • moonshadow@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s not, but the robot doesn’t have morals or a conscience or alignment with human values to get in the way. Kinda like billionaires!

    • Furbag@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      In a couple of years, the bubble may have already burst.

      Also, the robot is not just an employee, it’s an asset that can be sold off to pay debts in the event of bankruptcy.

    • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      A security guard that looks after real dogs. German Shepards and belgian whatchacall thems are better at this than some overhyped clanker dog.