• 6stringringer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    What an underachieving performance. We are better than these numbers. 3? That’s how many days our lord & savior, JC screwed around and then came to his senses before coming back to let us know that it is absolutely A-OK to hate & attack anyone that doesn’t believe for a minute that our boi Jesus here isn’t the most stickitydickitywickitywhackityfliggityflaggityfloggityflamp Thing in the world. Ever.

  • TwilitSky@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I don’t think there are any voters besides military contractors and politicians who are in favor of these wars. No one wants to spend our hard earned money blowing up a bunch of starving homeless people on the other side of the ocean.

    • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I’m related to one. They believe everything Fox News says and will twist themselves into logical pretzels to attempt to justify it when presented with evidence countering the narrative Fox says, even if it directly contradicts their own experience.

  • SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    20 hours ago

    A constant state of war is essential to fascism.

    The reality is, there will eventually be a draft. Will Americans stand for it? Probably.

  • Humanius@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    178
    ·
    2 days ago

    Africa, Asia, and South America

    So we are not counting North-America, where the ICE raids continue then?

    • northernlights@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      69
      ·
      2 days ago

      “Today there are so many places in the world where the U.S. government is conducting military operations — including the war at home on migrants — that each event eclipses the last in terms of media attention,” said Stephanie Savell, the director of Brown University’s Costs of War Project.

      • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 minutes ago

        Seems like you enjoyed US education. North America and South America are 2 continenta. They are sometimes referred to as The Americas when talking about them. Same as how europe and asia is called eurasia. Oh and “central america” is a part of north america.

        • Humanius@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          14 hours ago

          This entirely depends on where in the world you are from.

          The English-speaking world generally refers to America as two continents.
          The Spanish-speaking world generally refers to America as one continent.

          Neither are correct, both are correct.

      • frongt@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        83
        ·
        2 days ago

        North and South America are considered separate continents. They’re not even connected now that the Panama canal was dug.

          • backalleycoyote@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            22
            ·
            1 day ago

            Continents are a geological construct, with continents tending to be granitic, and oceanic plates typically being basalt. Dividing continents with geopolitical boundaries is a social construct.

            • partofthevoice@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 day ago

              Still it’s perhaps just a human-imposed classification scheme. What about Europe and Asia? Also, India? The boundaries themselves are quite symbolic of how we choose to see the world, even politically. We conceptually compartmentalize continuous systems using all kinds of sneaky criteria. If you’re strictly referring to geological objects, are you still even referring to continents?

              • backalleycoyote@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 day ago

                At the end of the day everything about how we engage with, understand, and define the universe is based off human systems because that’s just how we do. We’re intelligent enough to recognize beyond ourselves and deduce the nature of why things happen and then use our words to describe it. A granitic continent doesn’t know its granite and a basaltic oceanic plate doesn’t know it’s basalt, it operates as it’s properties demand, like they have for billions of years before humans and will for millions of years after we’re gone.

                The products of these natural cycles do lend to how humanity has organized itself for thousands of years. River valleys helped establish agriculture and the birth of “civilization”, and mountain ranges, deserts, great rivers, and oceans made for natural boundaries once populations grew to the size they started defining “them and us”.

                So I do agree that continents (and natural features in general) shape how we think of the people who live there, and some places have thousands of years of history where those features were the boundaries of their nation. But the physical structure we call a continent exists with or without humans calling it a continent, nations do not. Continents influence human affairs and cultural/national identity at home and abroad, but again, that’s heaping our humanness on what is otherwise a slab of granite that is doing its thing.

                I’d point out too, Earth’s plates are constantly shifting, but for the entire existence of humans they’ve only moved a few to a few dozen kilometers. Their importance to our social organizing is partly due to their seemingly static nature. But in 200-300 million years we’ll possibly be all jammed back together Pangea-style. Though I highly doubt humans will be around to see that.

          • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 days ago

            True but in this society we recognize 7. To recognize only one America with consistency you’re probably looking at 4 though maybe a 5th could be argued

            • Klear@quokk.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              2 days ago

              What do you mean “this society”? Different countries have different standards, and they’re all arbitrary.

              • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                I was literally taught two different models in school and those are far from the only ones.

          • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            29
            ·
            2 days ago

            They are separate tectonic plates, the two continents only crashed together relatively recently, the “columbian exchange” that saw wildlife mix between the continents. South America was near Africa at one point, North America more with Europe as I understand it.

            • Jack@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago
              1. Scotia plate (bits of Patagonia),
              2. South American plate,
              3. Altiplano plate,
              4. North Andes plate,
              5. Panama plate,
              6. Caribbean plate,
              7. North America plate,
              8. Pacific plate (Baja California peninsula, southern California).
              • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                2 days ago

                When I was on the Appalachian trail they had a placard that explained it and said it’s also the oldest mountain range in the world, and used to be like 4x the size of the himalayans (which is the youngest.) Others have disputed that, but just internet randos with no sources, I trust the NPS placard.

                • grue@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  21 hours ago

                  I trust the NPS placard.

                  If it was placed before 2025, sure.

                  Nowadays, though, they’re being systematically torn out and replaced with MAGA christofascist propaganda. Think “war of northern aggression” and destruction of anything about black history, for example.

                  I wouldn’t put it past them to replace info about plate tectonics with creationist bullshit eventually.

          • frongt@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            We did! The canal is tens of meters deep, while bedrock is typically not more than a few meters below the surface anywhere on earth (except where cover naturally collects in places like valleys).

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 days ago

          The Panama Canal doesn’t even go all the way down to sea level; it definitely does not make a difference.

        • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          2 days ago

          Depends on which third grade. Some countries learn about America as one continent in e.g. a six-continent model. Which I think is silly given the obvious first continental divide to go would be the Eurasian one that only exists for historical reasons.

          • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            22 hours ago

            This is the correct model. America developed very similarly, unlike parts of Eurasia which is why Europe and Asia are definitely culturally distinct, but America isn‘t. At least not for a lot of us.

            Sorry „north“ Americans, but you‘re not that different from Argentinians to us.

            • Soggy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              12 hours ago

              Developed very similarly? On what time scale? Inuit, Salish, Cherokee, Aztec, Inca, and Rapa Nui are all pretty distinct. Post-colonialism there’s lots of differences between French, English, Spanish, and Portugese influence. And topographically the North Andes are a pretty solid border (though in many ways it makes more sense to extend out to the coast).

          • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            Which I think is silly given the obvious first continental divide to go would be the Eurasian one that only exists for historical reasons.

            America makes sense for historical reasons as well. After all it is a massive settlers colony of different European nations. The Spanish influence very much connects both continents, if you want to do that.

        • 8oow3291d@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Going by Trump’s actions in first term, the “no wars” thing was the rare promise that was actually pretty believable.

          Trump first term didn’t start new big wars, and withdrew from e.g. Afghanistan (in a bullshit way, but still). Based on past actions, and yes because Trump promised it, I believed that Trump would be isolationist in his second term.

            • 8oow3291d@feddit.dk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              It’s so ironic then that Biden was so criticized for the consequences of Trump’s agreements with the Taliban 💀

              Trump was responsible for the vast majority of bad outcomes, yup. And the media did not reflect that.

        • BeardededSquidward
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Actually, if you tune into just right wing news they make Trump look like a 4D chess genius.

  • Loce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 day ago

    At this point I’m convinced Trump raped, tortured, killed and ate the babies in the Trump-Epstein files… distractions are wild… and working

    • 8oow3291d@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      But the oil price shock is going to hurt Trump electorally, and normal people’s wallets, way worse than the Epstein files. So in a sense it is silly to say that the distraction is “working”.

      • Loce@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        DoJ stopped releasing Epstein files indefinitely, because or Iran… so yeah, I think it’s working. MAGA is a cult, it’s not rational. What you think it might hurt him, it might as well make him stronger in the eyes of his followers… After everything that has happened, most of his base still follows him and will vote for him.

    • Doubleohdonut@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Yeah, right? It must be things he’s deeply ashamed of. I’ve never seen him work so consistantly hard on a single topic before.

      • BeardededSquidward
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        21 hours ago

        He feels no shame, the man is incapable of it. He just knows that it’ll look really bad to come out as a child raping cannibal is all.

  • ToiletFlushShowerScream@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    Remember “terrorist” is an ill defined term trump can apply to anyone who thumbs their nose at him and use as justification for sending our sons overseas to kill them.