• Donkter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    139
    ·
    3 days ago

    I think this person’s point was lost when they drew the creatures to be very cute as well.

    • exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      3 days ago

      Sarah’s Scribbles is one of the better comics for drawing the author’s self as pretty cute in most comics but knowing how to draw herself as an ugly goblin when the comic is making a point about insecurity or embarrassment around physical appearance.

      That comic is basically the gold standard for how to convey those ideas in an otherwise cute art style.

    • Anivia@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      And made them have bad fashion sense, haircuts and body language. Looking good isn’t just about genetics

    • Mac@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      The artist draws themself and they’re allowed to judge their own looks however they want,
      Even if we would disagree with them.

        • Mac@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          How? The comment is saying they’re cute, the artist is saying they aren’t.

          • Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            No, the comment is saying they are drawn cute, when the whole point of the artists comic is that they look like a goblin when they don’t.

            • Mac@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Ah, i see. It’s not that I’m missing the point of the other comment—no, you’re missing the point of mine.

  • Bruhh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    You’re not attractive to yourself. You aren’t your type but you are someone else’s type.

  • Mothra@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    3 days ago

    I don’t understand. Are the characters in the bottom frame supposed to look unattractive or undesirable in any way? Is that so for both or just the one on the left? If so, well, I don’t see it.

  • Mac@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 days ago

    The artist is actually so cute though

    Our self image has been destroyed by social media under capitalism.

    • Tiresia@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 days ago

      “Heroin chic” used to be an unironic term for female beauty standards. Nothing will be as bad for our self-image as the white supremacist capitalist monoculture of the 20th century.

      Social media has been a godsend, helping people build communities around other standards of beauty or even resisting central beauty standards altogether. The diversity of aesthetics, the social support for people who don’t fit the cookie-cutter mould, the sharing of nutritional delicious meals without advertisers leaning on the editor.

      Personally, people on social media advised me to cut shampoo when doctors told me to use more and more intense shampoo, so now I have healthier hair while spending less on product. Social media helped me recognize I was trans and showed me realistic transition timelines when regular media treated it as a vomitous joke and my psychiatrist said it was just the autistic tendency to question everything.

      Without social media I would probably have killed myself, unable to make myself conform to how my those around me said I should look and act.

      There are plenty of infohazards on social media, but Lemmy is also a social medium, as are reddit and youtube where I got most of that productive information over the years. I am glad social media exist, I’m glad we and others like us able to talk like this, and I hope we always will be able to. Though yeah, hopefully not through capitalism.

      • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yeah, that’s why I don’t like these under 16 social media bans. They’re gonna get kids killed. And also the privacy invasion, microtargeting ads, malware, billionaire profits, and lack of action on malicious UX patterns.

    • angrystego@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 days ago

      Self image has been destroyed by both social and classic media under any regime - I’m pre-social media and my self image was just as bad. But yeah, I agree that social media carry the torch now.

      • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        aww i got banned from reddit for posting luigis the old ultraviolence. if you are on reddit would you tell azul i like her art?

        i think it was this one that finally did it for me

      • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        So many words in the RAE dictionary that nobody uses anymore. But in this case, the form “creatura” is just weird. The conventional way is “criatura” for, basically, all Spanish speaking countries in XXI century.

      • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        It’s not synonym, cult means that the “correct” way to write it is “criatura”. Is in the index because the RAE acknowledge that “creatuta” exists as a word.

        • ccf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          cult. just means “creatura” is closer to Latin creatūra. Also, as far as I know, the RAE doesn’t list any misspellings. I’d take them acknowledging it exists as a word to be enough for it to count as “proper” Spanish.

          • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            I didn’t say is a misspelling. There’s a reason why the RAE page have all the definitions and synonyms in the “criatura” page (that dosen’t include “creatura”) while “creatura” only links to the correct spelling “criatura”.