A Democratic National Committee member is proposing a symbolic resolution for consideration at a DNC meeting next month to reject the American Israel Public Affairs Committee’s massive spending on Congressional races.

The measure, sponsored by a young DNC member from Florida, could put party leaders on the spot about the pro-Israel lobbying group’s outsized role in Democratic primaries.

A lobbying behemoth that for decades courted lawmakers on both sides of the aisle, AIPAC has become an increasingly toxic brand in the Democratic Party.

In recent years, Israeli leaders and their backers in Washington have become more closely aligned with Republican politicians. At the same time, however, AIPAC’s super PAC has focused tens of millions in spending on Democratic primary races.

    • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      14 days ago

      It’s actually anti-semitic for Israel to meddle in other nation’s politics because ironically enough it affirms nazi propaganda about the world being run by a secret jewish cabal… add in the Epstein honeypot and one might be tempted to say it was true all along…

      It’s a fucking torment nexus.

      • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        13 days ago

        it affirms nazi propaganda about the world being run by a secret jewish cabal

        Except that Israeli manipulation of Western countries’ politics is not at all secret. Netanyahu even brags about it.

        • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          13 days ago

          It was secret for a time. Maybe an unspoken, open secret, but a secret you weren’t supposed to talk about (remember when Ilhan Omar caught flack for calling it out?).

          The Epstein honeypot and its israeli connection was a secret, until it wasn’t…

          And Netanyahu is an anti-semite, for the pure fact that he turns himmlerian propaganda into a self-fulfilling prophecy, and tries the attach the evil that the state of israel is committing to Jewish identity as a whole. That’s literally anti-semitism.

  • TwilitSky@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    14 days ago

    Let’s strip away all the context here. No Israel. No U.S. no Democrats/Republicans.

    Imagine I told you a fictional country, the United Grapes of Dumberica was formed.

    Now imagine I told you that the government of this country had people from foreign governments both friendly and hostile giving them money.

    In what logical universe would would that be legal?

  • neuracnu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    14 days ago

    This is a giant waste of time.

    A) Restricting AIPAC just means capital and influence will flow from other, more obscure sources. It’s squeezing a closed tube of toothpaste.

    B) PACs should be illegal, full stop. So long as PACs exist, capital will continue to flow into our politics. And as the cost burden of jumping through regulatory hoops and sidestepping ridiculous half-measures like this one is trivial for large donors, PACs disproportionally benefit highly-funded causes as opposed to those powered by small donations.

    No half measures. Make PACs illegal.

    • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      14 days ago

      Ah, but this might be a step in that direction.

      After all, what politician receiving AIPAC funding is going to vote to make PACs illegal?

      Take that nectar away, and what’s stopping them?

    • Optional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      But the gEnOsiiiiiiiDE!!1! /s

      Just saying, screaming lefties won’t scream if it doesn’t say Zionism on the tin. So - sure, use the undemocratic tools provided by the fascist courts. Dog forbid anyone dig further than one layer into an issue.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 days ago

        Maybe if democrats credibly supported anything else, you wouldn’t have to be so dismissive of the anti-genocide left.

  • ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    14 days ago

    DNC “You could say AIPAC’s arguments moved me to a BIGGER HOUSE……. I said the quiet part loud and the loud part quiet. Oh, dear.”

  • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    14 days ago

    As they should. AIPAC funding is going to be the most toxic thing to any Democratic Party candidate’s campaign this election cycle…

  • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    Timing this a week AFTER Palestinian-American progressive badass Kat Abughazaleh lost her primary by just four thousand votes.

    A primary where both the eventual winner and the third placed establishment favorite were supported by millions of dollars worth of AIPAC ad campaigns.

  • eestileib
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    13 days ago

    DNC will purge this guy too. Dinosaurs and their paymasters want blood.

    • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      The Iranians were trying, with little success. Likewise the Chinese, though I don’t believe their role is as well understood, mainly because they’re better at securing their operations. The Saudis and Gulfies were also funding a lot of botnets and trolls.