• Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        46
        ·
        22 days ago

        The original phrase is pretty lame anyway. If you can’t do a thing, how can you be expected to teach it? I’d rather have a teacher that actually knows how to do the thing they’re trying to teach me.

        • Chronographs@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          40
          ·
          22 days ago

          The saying isn’t trying to convey that people who can’t do something are well suited to teach it, it’s disparaging teachers by saying if they were any good at what they teach they would be doing it instead of teaching it.

        • rockerface🇺🇦@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          22 days ago

          Probably better phrasing would be “Those who used to do, teach”. As in, teachers/coaches might be people who due to any number of circumstances can’t participate in doing the thing directly, but have experience in it.

  • thanksforallthefish@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    21 days ago

    Am I the only one who read that headline and thought “an art teacher told a student to dial down the feminism ? An art teacher ? Bullshit they did”

    Nice art but the backstory is utterly fake

    • gwl [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      21 days ago

      You do know that some art teachers are pricks, right?

      • SCmSTR
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        21 days ago

        That’s impossible. Nuance is obviously DEI bullshit.

    • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      21 days ago

      It can also be that the art teacher is perfectly fine with feminism but feels it is overpowering other themes. Dialling it down can be a valid criticism. You catch more flies with honey and all that.

      The response with this artwork is excellent though. It’s a piece specifically about feminism, so no need to dial anything down. It makes a point and is beautiful to look at. I’m not a big fan of art that uses text to make a point but I think here it serves a useful purpose and it wouldn’t have the same effect without text.

    • Gerudo@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      21 days ago

      Your be shocked what art teachers say, especially at the college level.

    • Wren@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      21 days ago

      I knew a highschool art teacher who woulds give any female student more then 80% because “women already get everything they want.”

      Your lack of real world experience is showing.

    • SleeplessCityLights@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      22 days ago

      Look up the first year they used an anatomically correct crash test dummy for a women to make cars safer. The world is bad for men too, in a heirchial system only those at the top “win”, for lack of a better word. Most men are just tagging along pretending to be on the winner team. Even though they failed to make the team in tryouts and are fans just be part of everything.

  • Vegafjord demcon@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    21 days ago

    The thing is that if we challenge the machine, it gets noted immidiately as being aggressive. The reason for this is because language is normalizing machine thinking. What will push workers in line, what will cool the bloom of the masses, what will paint the mighty as delightful, what will alienate us from our peers and nature.

    By taking guardianship for our languages, challenging our everyday words, we normalize the meaningful, normalize humanity.

  • nile_istic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    21 days ago

    My dumb optimistic ass scrolling to the comments under this post thinking “maybe this time iT wOn’T bE sO bAd” lmao

  • FaceDeer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    22 days ago

    Well, exactly. Put it somewhere between those extremes. Dials like these are important for avoiding the hyper-polarization the world is afflicted with these days.

          • backalleycoyote@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            21 days ago

            Yeah. I often wonder how many people who attempt to hijack a movement actually believe their singular view of what it should be should be the universal, how much of it is just ignorant ego and an attempt to remain relevant (looking at you JK), and how often it’s a deliberate attempt to both discredit one cause while tearing down another.

          • hakase@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            21 days ago

            Of course, but with some more equal than others, as my outspoken feminist boss demonstrated earlier this week. She insisted that feminist research into matriarchal societies had proven beyond a doubt that women govern better than men can, and that if we would just replace all men in power with women the US’s problems would practically solve themselves. This was one day after complaining to me about how unreliable her male coworkers were, and how you can really only rely on women when you want something taken care of.

            Feminists truly are beacons of equality.

              • hakase@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                21 days ago

                You could have listened to me, sympathized, and told me my misandrist experience is valid, but, then again, that’s a privilege reserved for women experiencing misogyny, isn’t it? Wouldn’t be very feminist of you to acknowledge just how widespread misandry is among feminists, eh?

        • SectoidLexi
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          21 days ago

          Oh no! Hating men for beating, raping, and exploiting us! How awful!

          • hakase@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            21 days ago

            I knew someone from one of the misandry instances would chime in to prove my point, so thanks! ^_^

            • SectoidLexi
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              21 days ago

              You haven’t really proven anything. You say misandry is the problem with being a raging feminist. All I said was hating people who oppress you is not a bad thing. Also one of the “misandry instances”? So are all queer or women oriented instances just misandrist to you?

              • hakase@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                21 days ago

                They’re not “just” misandrist; that is to say, they definitely have good reasons for existing outside of misandry, and I’m glad that they can provide that space for the people who need it. It’s also certainly not inherently misandrist to be queer or woman oriented.

                In the case of Lemmy, though, yes, all of the queer and women oriented instances are very clearly also misandrist. Openly and proudly so, in fact. Your comments here are an excellent, though comparatively mild, example of that.

  • tlekiteki@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    21 days ago

    Why even show it to this guy? You need to change his mind? Instead of the million people out there who arent total douches?