





So what is the downside of this? It seems like a net-positive. Decreased demand for fossil fuels is great! It’s a shame it took a bunch of death and destruction, but now that it has happened, the silver-lining is quite shiny.
Decreased demand for fossil fuels means lower GDP. “The GDP of a nation is its fossil fuels usage” : Jancovici
Energy use and economic output are interconnected. Wealthier countries typically have higher energy consumption per person, contributing to their higher GDP per capita.
If only there were a way to generate near unlimited amounts of energy without fossil fuels.
The entire concept of GDP is going to be the end of humans
Pardon my ignorance but… So what? Like, what if somecountry isn’t winning the economic dick waggling competition?
@zdhzm2pgp great!
It took millions of people dying and a genocide for this to happen 🤦♂️ I really don’t understand people.
The answer is money.
I know 😔 I still find it hard to believe that people can be so short sighted and selfish.
notice he made an assessment on getting more pil for the North Sea as a useless idea, meanwhile down in dumb fuck Australia
Good