• Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      172
      ·
      4 days ago

      After massive pushback. Their original plan was basically full control. It still is, but they’ll allow you to install something if you ask nicely first.

      The other issue is the timing. They can claim this is for security all they want, but it was announced suspiciously close to the courts ruling that Google needed to open up their ecosystem to other app stores. This is a blatant attempt to keep control of the app ecosystem by forcing devs to go through Google regardless of where they intend to release.

      • pfried@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 days ago

        Their original plan was basically full control

        I’m not happy with the change, but let’s at least get the facts straight, so we can argue our position better. Their original plan included a way to install apps from unknown sources, but it did not describe how that would work.

        • TheKingBee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          I’m honestly neutral with the change, it makes setting up a new phone a little more annoying, it will just be another step in the process and doesn’t stop me from doing anything. However the small barrier will stop scammers pressuring people into installing things. It doesn’t make it impossible, but will get rid of a lot of the low hanging fruit.

          • dogs0n@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 days ago

            When would a scammer make you download an app? They could just as (more) easily make you visit a website…

            It’s wrong to think this will stop scammers or malware.

          • Comrade_Squid@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            And where you drew the line? These things tend to move in one direction. so giving an inch may as well be giving a mile.

        • unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Of course it did.

          For two reasons.

          First - if anyone complains they can always say there exists a bypass, no matter how idiotically unworkable and annoying the process might be.

          Another aspect is that devs will probably want to test their apps easily and quickly - App stores are notorious for updates taking a few days to be approved. Even for Google, full-on lockdown might seem overkill. They don’t want to bother with speeding up their update approval process so devs can push test builds through the Ecosystem. Giving some route towards sideloading is a much saner solution.

      • pfried@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        They can claim this is for security all they want, but it was announced suspiciously close to the courts ruling that Google needed to open up their ecosystem to other app stores.

        The courts ruled that users need to be able to install competing app stores without any warning, which is different from how it works today. Obviously allowing installation without any warning would be a boon to malware authors, so they added a way for third party app developers (including app store app developers) to verify themselves and distribute apps outside the Play Store without a warning on installation. Now Epic can verify with Google and distribute its app on its own website without needing to tell the user how to dismiss a scary warning, and the same is true for Safeway and Proton and other developers that might want to self distribute. On top of that, now GrapheneOS can implement its own verification system using the same OS-level APIs. Maybe app authors can distribute apps themselves for users of GrapheneOS by registering their repo with a verification system that runs an automated security audit on the repo and ensures reproducible builds.

        Now that there is a way to distribute apps safely outside the system app store, that probably prompted them to look at what was causing malware problems with the current unverified app installation flow, and they came up with that system. Saying it’s some massive conspiracy won’t force them to change their minds, especially since there aren’t enough users who care to make a dent in their revenue. Proposing a less onerous way to stop malware and bringing that in front of a judge on behalf of the app developers who are harmed will.

    • XLE@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      68
      ·
      4 days ago

      Google is “only” locking you out of using your phone for 24 hours…

      For extra security, let’s make it a week. Let’s make it a month. Let’s make it a year.

    • rolling@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      4 days ago

      Ok? Its still my phone, my hardware, and now I have to wait 24 hours before I can install wahtever I want on the phone that I goddamn paid for with my own goddamn money.

      Also, let’s not pretend as if they not eventually going to go back to their original plan once the initial backlash dies down and people get used to the new norm.

    • Voxel@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      4 days ago

      For everyone unaware, enabling developer options already makes your OS less secure, so Google is requiring you to make yourself more vulnerable just to have the right to install any software, not just those allowed by Google. This has been among others confirmed by GrapheneOS themselves:

      Other: https://floss.social/@IzzyOnDroid/116261079131226664

    • Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 days ago

      Doesn’t the new process require the use of Google Play Services?

      Removing it would thus render a device unable to install apps at all.

    • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 days ago

      This is supposed to be a simplified message for tech illiterate people. While it may not be fully accurate, the alternative is something that <= 5% of the population will understand.

      Additionally, as others have pointed out, this is how the change was originally planned. It was only adjusted due to massive backlash. Apparently the current backlash is not enough for Google to adjust it further.

      • ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        4 days ago

        This was their solution to the massive backlash after they announced removing it altogether. We’re still worse off, and we already know their intentions. They’ll revisit the attempt later on. You feel for their ratchet effect. Stop applauding

        • BigBrownDog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Who’s applauding? I’m not rooting for Google, but if you buy a stock Android device with the idea that Google is looking out for you, you’re an idiot. They have shown time and again that they are evil, but you buy a device and think, “Android is for digital outlaws, like me.” you’re delusional.

          • BygoneNeutrino@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 days ago

            I use Android because the phones are dirt cheap. Most of these sort of phones are sold either at cost or at a loss, so it’s hard to complain.

    • pfried@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      And more correctly, harder to install apps the first time but easier than it is now to install apps in the future because that setting will now be copied to new phones instead of having to go through the flow again each time.

    • mazzilius_marsti@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      4 days ago

      motorola makes great phone. I remember my 1st Android phone, after years on iOS, was the Moto Z Play. That thing can last a week with light usage, or 3 days with medium usage on a single charge. Also remember those moto mods? Motorola had like speaker mod and even a mini projector that you can just snap on the phone.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        4 days ago

        They made better phones before Google bought them so they could strip all their patents before dumping the remaining husk on Lenovo for 15% of its previous value.

      • 🦄🦄🦄@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        ·
        4 days ago

        Getting a motorola cause they explicitly will be supporting GrapheneOS.

        But all of that is just a stepping stone. As soon as I deem linux phones to be usable as a daily driver for me, I won’t look back.

      • matlag@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 days ago

        If the rest-of-the-world can get its head out of its ass, a fork of AOSP with an open governance and a commitment to opensource and open platform, so that every one benefits from it. You wouldn’t need that much from each country to get more resources on that AOSP-bis than Google will ever be able to pour on its homebrew version.

        You make a rule that public service can only buy devices using AOSP-bis based systems (or even better: states choose their own AOSP distros) and quickly, Google has no choice but to follow your version, not the other way around.

        • thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          You make a rule that public service can only buy devices using AOSP-bis based systems (or even better: states choose their own AOSP distros)

          don’t give Google the monopoly

          better: “You make a rule that public service can only buy devices using libre systems”

    • MML@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      I would be so happy if the phone they release with graphene is the Razr, honestly might start work on it myself.

  • Sunflier@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 days ago

    On top of that, Samsung is ending its SMS and suggesting Google messenger as an alternative. I am not looking to train a chatGPT with my private text messages

    • p0358
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Samsung tried its own implementation of RCS, but Google in their monopolistic shittery straight up blocked out any implementations that aren’t literally themselves, open protocol farce

  • JATth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    3 days ago

    The fucked up thing with phones is the locked boot loaders. Locked boot loaders should not exist because this seriously restricts the driver and OS development.

  • manxu@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    4 days ago

    I am so endlessly angry at this, I actually switched banks because my old bank’s app didn’t work on a degoogled phone.

  • applebusch
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    3 days ago

    My latest phone is a Fairphone 6 with e/OS preinstalled, so it came degoogled and easily repairable out of the box. I intend to keep it for at least a decade. I cant imagine a feature I would be willing to upgrade for, so I’ll probably keep it longer than that.

    • AllHailTheSheep@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      the minute fair phone releases board schematics for the 6 I’ll buy one. they did it with the 5, id love for them to do it with the 6.

    • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      I wish i could trust the fairphone in the US but I think it only supports t mobile…I travel a lot and need solid connection in case I need lyft to work or something. And airline apps…

  • commander@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 days ago

    Hoping that Graphene Motorola partnership ends up making Graphene some really well supported target for bank/finance apps for those that make that a part of their required features for a phone. I can live with Firefox. Many seemingly can’t

  • HelloRoot@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Thats great and all, but completely non-actionable.

    Tell me instead - what exactly should I do?

    (should have mentioned that I already have a pinephone and grapheneOS on a GOOGLE pixel)

  • olduffer @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    4 days ago

    My tech brothers, how easy is it to install graphene on my pixel 7? Will my banking app (Barclays, UK) still work? Tia

    • ItsNotImportant24@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      4 days ago

      Its so easy with their web installer, takes like 5 minutes. If you go to their website they have a list of bank apps that work. Mine does and no issues. Ive been using Graphene for a couple years and can never go back.

      • toynbee@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        The only thing I’d like to note is, their guide says to use a high quality USB quality. Most times I’ve seen that, it’s been completely irrelevant. With the Graphene installation, the only hard part of the process was finding the USB cable that came with my phone. Once I did, all other obstacles disappeared.

      • kaidenshi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        super easy - barely an inconvinience

        I understood that reference!

        And agreed, installation is super simple, just a good quality USB-C data cable (the one that comes with the Pixel works great) and a Chromium-based browser. As for post-installation, yeah it can be a pain but you’d be surprised how much crap from your old phone you don’t actually need. Going GrapheneOS is a good way to go minimalist if you want to.

    • airman@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 days ago

      It should. My banking apps worked fine. None of them work on a rooted phone but worked absolutely fine on Graphene.

    • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      Super easy to install. I don’t use any banking app on my phone so can’t comment on that.

    • syaochan@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Not sure for that specific app, but I used 4 banking apps without problems. Google wallet does not work so I had to switch to Curve for NFC payments.

      • lazynooblet@lazysoci.al
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        I saw Curve being promoted as a replacement. Problem is as they act as a middle man you lose the credit protections normally afforded by your credit card which made me pause again.

    • femtek
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      I did that for my old pixel 7 so my daughter had something to play on. Works great.

    • Einskjaldi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      If you have location and mobile data on they’re generally less likely to fuss if you do ever have an issue.

    • not_IOOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      super easy and i never had a app not work instantly including bank stuff