Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?

@rimu@piefed.social

What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?

Mass instance bans

Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).

Done

Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).

Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

He has abused the modlog to claim ‘harassment’, which I have never engaged in. I have not even interacted with Rimu in any way for days prior to getting kicked from the PieFed developer Matrix channels.

He has decided to mass ban 20 users because they have spoken out against his erratic and hostile behaviour as of late.

  • Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    The only thing I’ve ever said to him was pushing back against his criticism with screenshots of evidence that proved him wrong.

    He is not removing people for a coordinated harassment campaign. He is removing people to silence dissent and exert a stranglehold on his platform and his own ego.

    PTB is, quite literally, not strong enough. He is an active danger to the entire fediverse as a whole. He is dragging down credibility of any instance that runs Piefed and has proven that not only is he a manchild incapable of regulating his own emotions and ego.

    Piefed has become Chernobyl levels of radioactive. You can keep running a Piefed instance but you better expect questions on why you’re helping to further this narcissistic psychopaths control and influence.

    It’s also kind of strange that Iso@lemy.lol is on that list. They’re a former admin of lemy.lol who had beef with Rimu but Rimu defederated from lemy.lol a while ago over their logo. The fact that he’s banning that user in amongst all the others kind of proves that this is a personal hitlist and not harassment. Otherwise, why are you banning a user that you’ve defederated from?

    • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 months ago

      As some rando who considered piefed due to the problematic Lemmy devs, I agree. The stuff I’ve read about it has turned me off of it, and I’m sure I’m not the only one.

      • Pamasich@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        You could always come to Mbin instead. I’m glad the worst controversy we’ve had was kbin’s lead dev’s early reactions and actions towards the Mbin fork. Which is hardly relevant anymore.

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s ironic because he’s so concerned about the Lemmy devs. I know I’ve personally called out nutomic before, and we had a respectful conversation, but ended up disagreeing. Rimu does it shamelessly and without respect and then expects everyone to sing his praises afterwards after he forces his perception on everyone else.

  • ea6927d8@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 months ago

    Those users are probably going to end up in a banned list hardcoded in the program.

    • Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      2 months ago

      Well, he already admitted that guardrails should have been put up on lemmy to prevent memes from taking root. So why not put up guardrails for users he doesn’t like?

      Oh wait.

      He did.

      He made an anti-cm0002 filter.

    • Mystic Mushroom [Ze/Zir]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      Which is funny because people have said Lemmy’s devs would do the same thing in regards to putting stuff into Lemmy. It’s also stupid because anyone who cares can make a new account with a different username on another server, or on their same server to bypass that.

      • calmblue75@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        There’s a good chance they’re going to see this post and prepare a second list, all the best!

        • Nora (She/Her)@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Honestly that’s why I’m replying to this. I feel like it’ll be a badge of honor to get added to Rimu’s hardcoded ban list.

      • curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I will personally find it funny if that happened, so that I get to pump up my codeberg numbers with pylova and pievolution code to just remove the list

        (Does codeberg even have that sort of activity stuff? I mostly live on my personally hosted repos at this point, I just think it would be funny)

    • vagrancyand@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 months ago

      Like everyone during their evangelical/liberal phase, he has a massive ego and believes he must be the most morally correct and ethical person and everyone that disagrees with him on absolutely anything must know that he is correct and is just trying to bring him and others back down to the tar pits because they can’t stand seeing such a shining beacon of light and morality.

      This is always exacerbated by people specifically on crusades, like someone that hatefucked an entire fucking piece of software into existence because he hated the idea people were more progressive than him because they were more well-read and informed than he was capable of making himself, and certainly more than he was himself when he formed his political opinions.

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        Having gone through something very similar to this myself, ‘round about 15 years ago -> Fuckin’ yyyyup.

  • Aspis@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 months ago

    Hi. Admin of lemy.lol here who is also on that list.

    I have made 5 comments in total and have not commented in the matrix channels. I have also made a single comment about Rimu. This.

    Rimu is incapable of handling basic criticism. If an admin is such a threat that a single comment about him constitutes a ‘coordinated harassment campaign’, then Rimu and Piefed.social must be defederated en masse. We at lemy.lol would do so if he didn’t defederate from us over his perception of a frog.

      • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        2 months ago

        Given how ubiquitous Pepe is as a template for emotes in places like Twitch, I argue that Pepe was taken back by the gamers as a mascot.

        Now, because gamers are gamers I also don’t fault anyone having reactive doubts about usage of Pepe. But I don’t think those doubts are license to action without some burden of proof.

        Posting frogs itself means nothing. The content of the frogs means everything, including dogwhistles. He’s not a dogwhistle himself anymore, just with exceptions to that rule, like the specific groyper one.

        He has been granted the title of having reasonable innocent use, but he has not been extended the rank of not having problematic associations.

      • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        That’s why you’ve got to use Pepe while being vehemently woke, to make it clear bigots aren’t tolerated

  • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    2 months ago

    Alas, yes, PTB.

    While any given instance can freely ban people for whatever reason, making reasons up is always gone to be PTB.

    If they’d just said they didn’t like the people and didn’t want them around? Shitty, but only PTB on a technicality, in that that’s something an admin shouldn’t use as criteria. Yeah, I know that seems fucking weird, but there is a degree of personal choice when running an instance. Nobody has to let in people they don’t like. On a small instance, it wouldn’t matter.

    But on that instance, it matters. If you’re going to play the heavy on a flagship instance, you’ve got a higher standard to meet. If that’s not in your capabilities, you shouldn’t be running a main instance. Foist that work off to someone temperamentally inclined to not screw the pooch. But if you’re going to be pulling that kind of thing, be honest. Don’t make up bullshit reasons, it destroys your credibility and shows that you are, indeed, in it for the power fantasy to some degree or another.

    Say what you want about the names on that list as members of the fediverse at large, but half of those names are well known to not abuse power, and the more recognizable ones sure as hell aren’t organizing any harassment. Even if only because they’re recognizable. They’d be smart enough to create a random account unconnected to their main ones.

    So, yeah, PTB and full of malarkey

  • lyrial@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 months ago

    Being online via Lemmy caused me not one, but 2 mental collapses (I’m fine now, diagnosed with bipolar and have meds now) so I decided to give PieFed a shot, since I get bored on “fedi” (I hate that name for the Misskey forks). The promise of better features faster seemed amazing (politics of Lemmy devs aside). I’ve been around since the very first day of the Reddit API fiasco, and despite this 2 week-old account, I’ve been around the block. The age of this account is not coincidental. Thankfully, the FAF exposed Rimu’s bullshit so I decided to start fresh yet again with the FAF (I’m already an anarchist, so why not?) due to this inexcusable drama stirring.

    My biggest hope is that the AN fork of PieFed is deployed soon and properly maintained, because Rimu has changed from “dev making a new product with easy contributions” to “perhaps the biggest authoritarian threat to the threadiverse driven by sycophants” in a matter of weeks.

    Rimu has banned some of the largest voices on the platform with this fell-swoop. This entire thing likely deserves its own static website in order to document what’s going on, because people on the flagship PieFed instance are never likely to see it. I may do this just because this is worse more than many realize, I think. We collectively saw threads dot net happening and basically all of the threadiverse defederated due to obvious foreseeable issues.

    This reminds me of that guy that was DM’ing people with a ban every time they used the word “bro” but on a much larger and more influential scale. We aren’t talking about a mod (that was on piefed btw, I think he made his own instance) now, but an entire development effort that can deeply harm not only this platform, but the very idea of this platform as a whole.

    In short,
    FUCK RIMU

  • Courtney (she/her/they)
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 months ago

    "these people don’t hide that they don’t like me and since I have a tiny iota of power I’m gonna ban them! Grr I’m angy! >:[ see it has an actual reason, I’m not whining! "

  • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 months ago

    Rimu is the creator of piefed? Glad I never switched, then! The Lemmy devs are certainly problematic in their own way, but piefed seems particularly heavy-handed in its censorship and banning.

  • Wren@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 months ago

    This confirms everything I said about piefed months ago. I even made a piefed account and brought up concerns, only to be told the “anti-tankie” controls were for everyone’s own good.

    Sucks to suck.