For a while now the transition away from Manifest V2 (MV2) to MV3 has been on-going and it looks like it is entering its final phase of deprecation, at least, in the case of Google Chrome. A recent discussion thread in the w3c WebExtensions Community Group GitHub repo has highlighted how the latest and upcoming versions of the most popular browser are expected to be its final releases with support for MV2 extensions.

What this essentially means is that the tricks and bypasses that were used to keep MV2 extensions like uBlock Origin and others alive will not work any more on Chrome, or at least not for very long. For example the Windows Registry mod that could extend MV2 availability will cease to function after Chromium version 151.

  • DigDoug@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Firefox and its derivatives (and Safari - sorry Apple users) are the only browsers not using Google’s Blink web engine these days - at least until Ladybird is released.

    Despite the Mozilla Foundation’s many stupid decisions, Firefox (and Safari) is starting to look like the only thing stopping Google from completely controlling the internet.

  • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    181
    ·
    4 days ago

    Oh look all the “chrome but in a different outfit” browsers are doing the same terrible shit? What a shocker, no one could have predicted that the many many things all on the same base where actuality just fake competition.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      4 days ago

      They are all chrome with google scratched out and their name written in sharpie in its place.

      Of course they are all doing it, cause they are all the same thing.

    • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      4 days ago

      God it still pisses me off what they did to my boy Opera. All of us left when they diverted after v12. We all saw this coming.

      Then Vivaldi came which I have tried in quite a while but it sucked. Firefox it is.

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        I like Vivaldi except for two things: it uses the same engine as Chrome so facilitates Google’s stranglehold on web standards, and it is closed-source. For functionality and design it’s one of the best, but those are important downsides.

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        Chrome is death to a browser, there is little reason to exist if google gets to make the big calls.

    • andz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      It’s a damn shame, I’ve always liked Vivaldi otherwise. I’ve been dual running Vivaldi and Firefox for years now, Vivaldi for casual browsing and Firefox for more serious stuff + YouTube.

      Oh well, it’s time to do a full switch, I guess.

      Kinda funny, I’ve been doing the exact same thing with Win/Linux for approximately the same length of time. Needed Win because of dome software that just doesn’t work linux, and sadly, I still do.

      Google and Microsoft can go fuck each other with a frozen cactus for all I care.

      • kamen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        4 days ago

        The folks at Vivaldi have been doing some work on their internal ad blocker, I think with the intention to bring most of the functionality of uBo internally so that it doesn’t have to be an extension. Not sure how far along they are, but maybe they’re intentionally keeping it quiet.

        • reka@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          Vivaldi have earned and deserve a lot of trust here I believe. All my chromium eggs sit in their basket.

          • kamen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            Same here. I’m an Opera refugee so to say (and I had high hopes for Opera actually). I’ve been using Vivaldi since its first public alpha/preview/whatever they were calling it.

        • andz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Aye, I’m just not sure how it’s going to play out. One can hope, though. It’s definitely one of the best options Chrome-wise either way.

          • kamen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            I’m wondering what the decision making was when they were starting (which is now 10 years ago already, time flies, yo).

            From today’s perspective, a Firefox fork sounds way more logical. Back then maybe things with Blink/Chromium weren’t looking so grim, maybe they were relying on the experience of that part of the team that moved over from Opera…

            • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 days ago

              10 years ago Google was trusted and liked. The cracks were starting to show, but we’re talking about the Google that was still open sourcing a lot of their products and loudly opposing government censorship of the internet.

    • SpaceCadet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      I mean, on a technical level chromium isn’t a terrible browser engine. Building your own engine from scratch is Extremely Hard™ and it’s entirely possible to build a decent browser on top of it, so I can understand why most alternative projects have done just that.

      It’s just… google’s control over chromium is concerning.

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        And an ecosystem of one engine is not healthy. Even if google was not google, this is a massive risk to take for the Easy™ way.

        • SpaceCadet@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          It’s not an ecosystem of one, though one is very dominant.

          You can compare it to Linux. It’s not the only Unix-like kernel, but it’s similarly dominant. If you want to create a new distribution, it doesn’t make any sense to spend a decade trying to write your own kernel rather than just using the Linux kernel (insert GNU Hurd jokes here).

          Is that an unhealthy ecosystem then? I don’t think it is.

          What makes the chromium situation unhealthy is Google’s ownership and control, not that it’s the preferred engine for other browsers. I mean, even a company as large as Microsoft gave up trying to create their own engine.

          • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Your example is a poor choice, Linux overall is one example of an OS for users. There are more OS choices then Linux, that is good. Nothing like web browsers where people where actively trying to make everything chromium based. The ecosystem is unhealthy when there is one choice for an entire type of software (so for OS you have Linux, Windows, and Mac as big players) and outside of Firefox and its forks all web browsers are Chromium based. Oh and although there are other fringe options they don’t matter much, much like in the OS world Temple OS is not a real choice.

            My point was that it would be very very bad if Firefox was not there (or turned into chromium) as an ecosystem of one is a massive risk regardless of who controls it.

  • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 days ago

    it’s like people don’t remember what surfing the web was like before ad-blockers. If adblockers go away for real, people nerds will revolt

  • nullspace@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    110
    ·
    4 days ago

    The browser wars have been kind of strange from the perspective of someone who’s been using Firefox for well over a decade. It’s a bit like hearing about the Civil War while living in Oregon.

    • henfredemars@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      191
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yep, sorry but not sorry. Advertisements aren’t safe. The industry has been ruined by bad actors and it’s a shame, but also not my problem.

      • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        129
        ·
        4 days ago

        I worked in ads only a few months and learned how fucked that industry was. They’re basically given license to just run scripts in your browser, sucking as much info as they can. The fact that it hasn’t been regulated to hell is shocking, and truly a failure of all leaders.

        • OwOarchist@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          74
          ·
          4 days ago

          They’re basically given license to just run scripts in your browser

          That’s the crazy thing.

          You want to show me an image, maybe an animated gif, and link it to your website where you’re selling shit? Fine. Annoying, but fine.

          But I don’t care how many crocodile tears they shed about ‘but websites depend on ad income’ – I am not letting random, unvetted advertisers run arbitrary code on my computer. I don’t care if it’s in a sandbox inside a sandbox. Exploits may be found, sandboxes may be escaped. And there’s plenty of trouble they can get into even within their little sandbox, like running a fucking crypto miner or something.

          So, yeah. Adblock and noscript everywhere and always.

          • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            4 days ago

            Yes, they can host a GIF on their server & show it to me with a non-personalized link, & promote it where they believe the average reader might be interested in it. Or some reader(s).

            Just show me the ads you’re showing everybody else, and make money from sales of useful things & services.

            • OwOarchist@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              19
              ·
              4 days ago

              It’s not even that hard to have targeted ads while still respecting privacy – just base the targeting on the other content on the page, rather than on the user.

        • Airfried@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          4 days ago

          Internet Browsers store way too much data and have waaaay too many permissions. It’s sickening.

          • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 days ago

            not enough, what they want is personal data to mine. they cant do that in simple terms. meta, glassdoor, indeed , linkden,(plaid) tries to use convoluted mehtods to get you to give up more personal data than you normally would in order to access the rest of the site.(glassdoor and indeed has an additional reason to want you ridentiy)

        • HertzDentalBar
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          4 days ago

          It’s because people don’t go into these offices with fire and guns. If a bunch of advertising people were slaughtered every few weeks things may get better.

          Same goes for collections, eventually no one will want to do the job.

      • cecilkorik@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        4 days ago

        The whole industry is bad actors. The quaint, pastoral idea of actually advertising things you genuinely might want to know about is utterly beyond dead, it died the moment they realized they could use the same pipeline to harvest data and manipulate and control people. Using it for mere advertising is a waste of everyone’s time and resources when they have an option so much more lucrative on the table.

    • Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      4 days ago

      Over 10 years ago someone at my office had their work PC and user drive encrypted with ransomware because of a bad ad injection from one of those job search sites. Thankfully it was limited to nothing critical and incremental backups restore the drive…but hopefully they found a good lead because they were canned.

      If they’d had a good ad blocker this would have been a non issue

      • DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        4 days ago

        I work in IT: Pretty much all the malware we deal with comes from ads. I’ve pitched making ad blocking standard but they never go for it, even though it’s clear it would prevent an absolute shit ton of attacks. It’s crazy!

    • tatterdemalion@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 days ago

      Seriously. If Google really wants to shove ads down our throats, they could at least regulate them so they’re not constantly horny scams. But that would cost them money, oh the humanity.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    3 days ago

    Ublock was already somewhat neutered on Chrome, and people didn’t seem to notice. They keep using it.

    I’m just so cynical these days. It’s not like the Windows XP era, where people eventually get fed up with enshittification, and move.

    Google won. Facebook won.

    They have absolute control, basically.