• bigbangdangler@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    142
    ·
    3 days ago

    Sadly I have generally watched in horror as my friends quote Gemini slop as fact checking on the regular, because it’s the default search result.

    I speak up about it, and explain why it’s problematic. Doesn’t matter. It’s convenient.

    Convenience always wins.

    We’re cooked.

    • karashta@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      3 days ago

      I know people that will complain about the crappy results but then not use a different search engine. Like it’s too much cognitive load to go to duckduckgo or qwant or whatever

      • Baylahoo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        To be fair, duck duck go also has some garbage results compared to like 2015 google. I have used ddg for the past several years and many topics yield terrible results. I was “the good googler” amongst my peers at the time. I haven’t tried qwant, so it might be better. A lot of search engines are worse and I’m guessing it’s partially because the web is just bloated with trash now.

        • prole
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’m glad I’m not the only one who thinks DDG search is dogshit

          I’ve been using StartPage, and the results are generally much better (though I think they are technically taken from Google, so…)

        • IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          A lot of search engines are worse and I’m guessing it’s partially because the web is just bloated with trash now.

          That’s sadly a big part of it. Other is that search engines in general are worse today as everything apparently needs to be AI. Google spesifically has gotten worse over the years, but it’s not alone. And that indirectly affects other engines, like duckduck, which at least partly uses other engines at the background.

          But with DDG bangs are pretty neat. If you don’t find what you’re looking for via DDG search just add ‘!g’ to the query and you’ll get same search from Google. Or pick from “a few” other engines with their own bangs.

        • Anivia@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Even today’s Google (if you use an adblocker) is still much better results than Duckduckgo from my experience. I use ddg first, but I often have to resort to Google if the results are shit.

          • prole
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            Check out Start Page.

            Uses Google results, but it doesn’t track or profile you

    • lechekaflan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Nah, they’re cooked. Only ones going against this stupid machine worship are those who actually touch grass.

    • Vince@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Hmm, makes me wonder if a big factor is that it reads the first couple of results and summarizes it. Like if it was turned off, people wouldn’t bother clicking through and reading, so they just leave and and “fact” get saved in their brains. If they were really motivated, they would click through and read and come to the same incorrect conclusions but most don’t bother so the misinformation doesn’t propagate as easily

  • Nautalax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2 days ago

    When I was a kid I thought “talkie” was such a ridiculous, funny-sounding word for the advent of films with sound. It was only years later that I realized that the word “movie” which I had never thought twice about was almost the exact same thought process for, you know, pictures that moved.

  • arcine@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    And hence why we call it “métrage” in French, as in “un long métrage” (a feature film) and “un court métrage” (a short film) ; because we measure in metres !

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    3 days ago

    There are many different tiers and types of AI users. Anyone who uses Grok might not be eligible for the death penalty in the US due to diminished capacity.

    • lath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      They would in a type of society where it’s considered evidence of imperfect genes.

  • GalacticSushi@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    3 days ago

    Merriam-Webster is a source of factual information. Factual information is woke or something. Elon doesn’t allow grok to consider anything woke in its answers. Therefore grok doesn’t get the info from Merriam-Webster.

  • A Sharky Anthro@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    3 days ago

    ROFL I always wonder if we are totally cooked as a society, if the billionaires are going to get what they want. Sometimes, I think so. However, there are enough people that thing LLMs are total bullshit and won’t be lured in. Good on Merriam-Webster to clap back on grok induced stupidity!

  • Corvus Cornix@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    To be fair, I wouldn’t expect grok to be using actual facts and reputable sources as its baseline knowledge, given its owner.

  • lyralycan@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    Merriam Webster is my least trusted dictionary. Meanings and words I’ve looked up in the past have been either inaccurate or biased to a North American understanding. I use English English, and prefer Cambridge and (secondary due to online paywall) Oxford (UK ver.).

    • drcobaltjedi@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      Merriam Webster is my least trusted dictionary. Meanings and words I’ve looked up in the past have been either inaccurate or biased to a North American understanding.

      You don’t like Merriam-webster because the american dictionary company caters to American English?

      • lyralycan@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        It doesn’t always clarify it is American English, and implies to non-English speakers that it is the standard form, when it is a variation. This, along with American English teachers around the world teaching their form, misrepresents English itself.