What you are depicting is called Eurasia. Which is the single landmass that make up Europe and Asia.
But you are right that Europe and Asia are considered separate for cultural reasons, and are not really geographic continents but subcontinents of Eurasia.It is no more correct to cal Europe west Asia than it would be to call Asia east Europe.
The entire concept of continents is entirely cultural. The number of continents taught in schools varies greatly from country to country (specifically because the Americas can be 1-3 continents in different systems).
So yeah, there is no objective correct about continents, it really depends on which cultural tradition you were brought up in.
specifically because the Americas can be 1-3 continents in different systems
I know North and South America and it being a single continent, but three? Or are you talking about Afro-Eurasia?
Notth/Central/South america
Really? Who considers Central America a continent? Not a region, but a continent. I always understood it as something similar to say North Africa.
In Brazil I was taught in terms of North, Central, and South America. I suspect it may be similar in other Latin American countries.
I mean, couldn’t you just work with the tectonic plates? They roughly align with the traditional “continents”.
It’s a good idea but it opens a whole other can of worms, like by the tectonic plate definition, India is its own continent.
Americans are going to love having to learn the name of the continent that split their west coast cities.
They will wish it would drop into the sea or something. 😂
Obligatory Map Men: https://youtu.be/hrsxRJdwfM0
Yes, to the people that created the distinction based on “cultural” reasons, India, the middle east, Japan, the Urals, Mongolia and China have much more in common with each other than Europa has with any of them.
We are all brothers and sisters.
