• megopie@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    5 days ago

    Everyone forgets that Che was a collage educated upper middle class yuppie who got radicalized on a road trip while trying to “find him self”

    So, like, this is basically his crowd when he was younger.

  • eestileib
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    6 days ago

    Famous politicians tend to be narcissistic sociopaths, and looking for validation from a narcissistic sociopath is a dead end.

    • therealdries@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      6 days ago

      Stop peddling horseshit.

      That’s what you are… a peddler of horseshit - you know, because that’s what you are doing… peddling horseshit.

      Kindly stop that.

      • mortemtyrannis@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        6 days ago

        I don’t understand the consternation with accepting Che was homophobic.

        He was a product of his times.

        Is it really that shocking that a man in the 1950s has homophobic views?

        You linked a source saying this; he called a gay man a pervert.

        Why die on this hill?

        • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 days ago

          Is it really that shocking that a man in the 1950s has homophobic views?

          Yeah, I mean, even FDR personally murdered dozens of gay people with a chainsaw.

          Oh wait! I made that up! But I bet I can find some problematic statement he said at some point in his life, so I guess that’s fine that I said that.

        • WraithGear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          5 days ago

          wait wait wait, i thought the whole point of this was the insinuation that he was homophonic and is blamed for creating gay work camps and committing human rights violations against gay people. this person lays out a detailed rebuttal on the major talking points that would back the accusers assertions… but now it’s “well everyone at the time was homophobic!, so i am still technically right!”

          so you do know there is a difference between someone who uses the word gay to mean bad or gross, and someone who commands the creation of concentration camps to commit human rights violations against gay people right?

          it’s a little dishonest. is this moving the goal post?

          • Sarah Valentine (she/her)
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            so you do know there is a difference between someone who uses the word gay to mean bad or gross, and someone who commands the creation of concentration camps to commit human rights violations against gay people right?

            The latter relies on the former to attain power. We should tolerate neither.

            • WraithGear@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              4 days ago

              so you don’t recognize the difference then. and your entire point is meaningless.

              and i would think you would be happy to know that he hasn’t used such language in quite a few years.

              • Sarah Valentine (she/her)
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                so you don’t recognize the difference then.

                Translation: “I want to normalize but not reclaim a slur. How do I spin this so it doesn’t seem so bad?”

                • WraithGear@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  you are inventing an enemy of your own choosing instead of being honest with this “discussion”

                  i never said that, but i can see why you would rather argue someone who acutely believed that then admit you lack the bare basic nuance to separate hitler from an edgy 90’s tween, due to not wanting to actully defend the argument against Che after, from what i can see, is a very reasonable rebuttal.

                  you must have something against Che, but are unable to articulate why he is bad

        • therealdries@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          5 days ago

          Is it really that shocking that a man in the 1950s has homophobic views?

          Is that the problem you see here?

          Really?

          A shitlib waddles into a leftist space, does what every shitlib does whenever Che’s name gets mentioned and craps out the standard shitlib disinformational propaganda about him they always do, and that’s the problem you see here?

          You linked a source saying this; he called a gay man a pervert.

          I hate to be the one to break it to you… but LQBTQ people get to be perverts too - just like the rest of us.

        • Godric@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 days ago

          Like honestly, how many dudes born in the 1920’s had any sort of positive view on homosexuality? Crazy how hero worship whitewashes people who weren’t heros.

      • Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        See, there’s stuff that’s clearly wrong, like:

        • Paraguayans drinking it too cold
        • folks in northern Paraná drinking it too hot
        • Argentinians roasting it too much, until it’s brown
        • Riograndenses milling it too thin

        But canned yerba? That isn’t just wrong, it’s abomination! Refer to Dante’s Inferno: the 8th circle is for the fraudsters who put cheese on garlic-and-oil pasta and ketchup on pizza, but the 9th one is for the ones who drink canned yerba! It’s treason!!!1one

        (I think it should be clear for anyone I’m joking with the fake outrage. Specially given I quite like tereré, i.e. Paraguayan style cold yerba. And unlike Che I’m not some boomer to tell others to stop enjoying what they enjoy. But seriously, I bet he’d be mad at the canned yerba. And most other things in the meme.)

        Anyway, it isn’t just about the caffeine content, it’s all that nice ritual and the flavour and everything else.