• phutatorius@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    says he has a 0.38in member

    Poor guy. I’ve been with women who have clits bigger than that.

    The 2-decimal precision of the measurement is also an interesting touch.

    I’m glad I’m not him, but if I were him, I think I’d learn from the Sisterhood and get skillful with fingers and tongue. I’d be nervous having anyone chopping on my winkie, for whatever reason, though microsurgery can be amazingly good these days.

  • FurryMemesAccount
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    2 days ago

    He said he’s struggling to approach “females”…

    All of a sudden my empathy’s on strike.

    Wo-men. How hard is it to use the humanizing word?

    Edit : my preshot was correct, in the end of the article, it’s reported that he sent unsolicited intimate pics and made fatphobic insults.

    • potoooooooo 🥔@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      He’ll just be the guy who USED TO have the world’s smallest penis. But nobody will believe him when he whips out his perfectly average penis.

  • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    2 days ago

    The surgery might be expensive, but it will save a lot of money over the years with current fuel prices, as he can go drive a normal car instead of a massive truck. More Americans should do this, especially fElon and diaper Donny.

  • PNW_Doug@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    123
    ·
    3 days ago

    Joking aside, what a rotten bit of genetic luck with which to get saddled. Best of luck, guy.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’ve heard stories from ladies that made my eyes water. Guys they liked and decided to get physical with only to discover they were working with something roughly the size of their own clitoris. It really is an immediate dealbreaker much of the time, and you can’t blame them for wanting a functional sex life. Poor dudes really got worked by chance. I can’t even figure out how evolution has left this a possibility.

      • Talcosis@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m pretty sure the physical structure starts developing in utero before the gender is finalized…and then it becomes either a clitoris or a penis. Crossed wires, mebbe?

        • scarabic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          You’re right - it’s similar to how men have nipples for no reason except that they are formed before sexual dimorphism begins to differentiate a male fetus from females. In defiance of the typical MAGAt’s view that sex is fundamental, essential and entirely binary, it’s more of a vestment that each of our core selves is garbed in. The morphology of tissues being signaled by hormones, you can easily imagine that it gets tuned differently for different people.

      • hperrin@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        Evolution works by minimizing this kind of abnormality, but it never disappears. There’s just too much variance in how our DNA works. That’s a good thing, though, because the environment is not static. Without any variance, we would have died out a long long time ago. We need to adapt to survive in new environmental conditions.

        • scarabic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          It’s a good point that traits may not be useful now but could be useful later. Perhaps I just lack Imagination but I can’t visualize the change of season that’s going to make micropenis a survival advantage.

          • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Sometimes it’s not the thing that gives an advantage, but the thing it’s connected to. Perhaps the same same gene that gives them a micropenis also makes them really fit in some other area. It’s unlikely, but possible that the genetic mutation makes them immune to some devastating disease in the future. Genetics are complex.

          • hperrin@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Evolution still doesn’t work that way. If it prevents you from reproducing (like this probably would), it will be selected against, meaning it will be extremely rare (like this is), but it will never just go away unless it isn’t compatible with life (eg, missing an X chromosome).

            • scarabic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              18 hours ago

              I have trouble processing the word “never” in your statements here because evolution has consigned so much to extinction that I don’t understand why traits can “never” disappear. Can you explain why a phenotype that would prevent you from reproducing can “never” lead to a genotype disappearing entirely? Blocking reproduction seems incompatible with life to me.

              • hperrin@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                18 hours ago

                Because there are so many humans that someone’s almost definitely gonna have it. If there were like a million people, then we probably wouldn’t see many of these traits, but there are 8 billion people around. That means on average, traits that are one in a million are in 8,000 people. Traits that are one in a billion are still likely to be in a handful of people.

                If it’s incompatible with life, no one will have that trait, because no one will be born with it. If it merely prevents you from reproducing, it just won’t be heritable, but the mutations/anomalies will still happen, so people will have them.

                • scarabic@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  18 hours ago

                  I see the general point, it’s just the perforce absolutism of it that I don’t get.

                  For example, if what you say is true and as long as a large population survives, all its genes necessarily do to, then shouldn’t there be people somewhere in some numbers that exhibit every trait in every one of our evolutionary ancestors? Even in your own examples you only go up to one in a billion, but odds do actually go lower than that.

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        3 days ago

        Wait…penis enlargement surgery EXISTS??? Why don’t all men know about this??? Hang on guys, I’m going to find out what the largest penis in history has been…and then I’m getting TRIPLE that size!!!

        • titter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          For what i recall, from being chronically online:

          They go in around your lil guy and release the shaft from everything around it and shift it forwards. It gives you more visibility of what exists but does not actually make anything bigger. Idk about adding anything, because i did not look into it further.

        • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          36
          ·
          3 days ago

          It’s my understanding that it’s more of a last case scenario kind of thing, like, most guys don’t want to have surgery on their penis and it can also have complications too.

          • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            2 days ago

            Yeah, unnecessary surgery around all those nerve endings sounds crazy.

            Congratulations on your new 14 inch wang, no feeling.

            • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Yeah… I don’t think they can add nerves or whatever tissue your the dick is made out of… I wouldn’t think the end result could be all that functional. Who gives a shit about aesthetics if you can’t cum…

              • Panini
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                They can’t add nerves, but they can connect existing ones assuming there’s an effective technique for the structure (probably not when you’re going for something this…inhuman)

        • Tujio@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          31
          ·
          3 days ago

          Rumor is that’s what happened to Elon’s dick. Botched enlargement surgery.

        • HeyJoe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          3 days ago

          I would say it’s probably not worth it just because you will most likely have sensory loss and erectile dysfunction which for most would be worse than the problem its self. Theres more risks as well, but those alone sound like a nope from me.

        • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          3 days ago

          It exists, but the complications are prohibitive for someone that isn’t hit with disability level malformation. Plus, there’s a limit to what it can do

        • YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          /uj some of us are happy with what we got. Also there is a things as too big. I don’t want to hurt my partner.

          /rj you sure you want 3 Steven Millers on your crotch?

        • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          There is a ligament that can be relocated to make a flaccid penis appear larger, but there is no enlargement surgery.

        • ramble81@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          The surgery went a success but as a complication you can no longer get a boner.

  • hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    3 days ago

    I kinda feel for the guy. That’s a really unfortunate situation. He says it’s the size of a pinky finger nail. It’s gotta be hard for him to go to the bathroom, which he says is why he wants it enlarged.

      • MrEff@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        105
        ·
        3 days ago

        This is actually a great example of how the majority of ‘gender affirming care’ is actually for a person who is already assigned at birth the gender they are affirming.

        This male, who was assigned male at birth, is seeking gender affirming care to become… more male.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I wonder if he’s tried pee funnels. They allow women to pee standing up. In fact, given how women all manage peeing I am surprised that his doctor says his only option is to wear diapers. Can he not sit and pee and make that work? Perhaps not. Inquiring minds want to know.

      • petrol_sniff_king
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I would assume the incontinence is because he is incontinent and not because he doesn’t know how to sit down, but I’m not motivated enough to look it up.

        • scarabic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I don’t actually see it written anywhere that he is incontinent, as in he can’t control when he pees.

          You might have thought this because the Guardian article says he must “wear diapers for adults with incontinence,” but that appears to be a descriptor of the diapers, not him.

          In his GoFundMe he gets more specific:

          I have a condition called Micropenis which causes me to be only 0.38 inches, which has made everyday tasks like using the restroom without making a mess is extremely difficult for me. Because of this, my doctor has advised that I must use pull ups unless I can pursue a medical procedure to help increase the size and improve my ability to urinate.

          So it does sound like a physical issue getting the pee into the toilet, not general incontience.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    3 days ago

    Michael Phillips said online on Thursday that he needed the procedure to improve his ability to urinate, which is difficult for him given that he is reportedly 0.38in (0.97cm) long when fully erect. Otherwise, he said he must continue to wear diapers for adults with incontinence every day.

    This is a compelling reason. Let’s help the guy out. Donated.

  • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    3 days ago

    I commend him for publicly talking about it. I also commend him on his ability to admit his poor behavior. I genuinely hope he gets what he wants from this experience.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 days ago

      Almost certainly. Gender affirming care also includes things like breast reduction for men, and anything else that is done to make someone appear more like the stereotypical form of a given gender. It doesn’t matter if you’re assigned that gender at birth either.

    • toddestan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      Maybe? The article says he has trouble urinating and has to wear diapers. One of the goals of the surgery is so he can urinate properly and presumably not have wear diapers any longer. So I can sympathize with him. On the other hand, it doesn’t appear that the surgery is strictly medically necessary either.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      Hey. This is unrelated, but, well, I see your username and icon. I figured you of all people would want to know about this if you don’t already.

      Did you know Andy Merill, voice of Brak, is pretty active on Bluesky? I just found out last night. He trashes the GOP on a regular basis from what I can see.

      @amerrill2.bsky.social

      Edit: In looking up his actual handle for you, I noticed he mentioned that he recorded some stuff for a cartoon network/adult swim five part documentary set to release in 2027.

      I really wish C Martin Croker were still alive to contribute to that. I hope they got George Lowe as well.