• Mistiygirl@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    2 days ago

    damn. that’s kinda accurate. the only thing i’d wanna point out is that literally everyone has to eat food to survive while vaccinations are not strictly necessary for survival.

    otherwise this is spot on.

        • arrow74@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          Unfortunately you’ll also need to account for generally better access to nutrition in the modern era. The immune system has a better chance if you’re not malnourished or starving all winter.

          You could probably extrapolate this number by the death rates amongst just the nobility

          • Doom@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Not necessarily. Nobiles of the past had a diet similar to ours. Higher fat, carbs, sugars, more processed, not exactly healthy. They were also far less active then their servants and highly, highly, inbred. And while they had healthcare, I wouldn’t necessarily call it good healthcare. Having access to more food energy helps but it isn’t a magic bullet.

            • arrow74@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              24 hours ago

              not exactly healthy

              I promise it was a lot healthier than starving during the winter

              As for the rest you’re really relying on a generalization that’s based on what is essentially the highest ranked nobles of the later Renaissance period.

              In 1100 AD their marriages were insular, but not hapsburg level. And generally nobles were expected to have some martial prowess or at least look like they did.

              But I think this comes down to the bigger issues of people lumping in the middle ages and the Renaissance, and to be completely fair no one specified either

          • SpacetimeMachine@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            But then you also have to account for all the processed garbage food we eat now also. There may be less kids starving now, but I wouldn’t be surprised if the general quality of the food has also plummeted.

          • Mistiygirl@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Yes, you dumb dumb, I know vaccinations do that. Im saying that our immune system is actually really fucking good and humans did also survive until 40 and up without vaccinations for thousands of years.

            Duh, vaccinations contribute a lot but are not strictly required for survival or a functioning immune system

            • ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              As a species yes. But again, 40% were dead before 15. By 40 that percentage was even bigger. So most did not survive to 40 and up.

            • arrow74@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              If I gave you a revolver with only 1 bullet out of 5 shots and gave it a spin, would you be willing put it to your head and pull the trigger?

              Because those are actually better odds of survival than the average human faced before vaccines

              The immune system isn’t fool proof.

              • Mistiygirl@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                I’m not arguing against vaccinations, I hope you realize that. I find it absolutely incredibly what we’ve been able to achieve in illness prevention and even erradication.

                The only thing im trying to say is that we shouldn’t understate how incredible the human immune system is, and saying it can’t function without vaccines is just misinformation.

                • ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  You know what would really highlight how amazing the human immune system is, instead of this antivaxxer line of comments?

                  How introducing an already dead or greatly weakened form of a disease to it gives it the fore knowledge on how to defeat the real thing in the future.

                  Like. A. Vaccine.

  • Zephyr@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    Human minds are simple. They aren’t good with probability, statistics, volumes, or anything not linear. They are though amazing storytellers, fundamentally a human mind may just be that, a persistent story. In storytelling we simplify things into a finite set of groups, namely the groups we belong to and the ones we do not. Typically anything involved with the self is good and anything opposing the self is bad. Anything affirming one’s view or story is accepted easily, if not automatically and anything opposing one’s story is nearly impossible to accept regardless of its validity.

    • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      But that isn’t god given. You can learn, you can try your mind to not be so one-dimensional. The problem is that most people on this planet are complete morons and the school system is failing them.

      • Signtist@bookwyr.me
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        You can only learn if you truly believe that you don’t already know the truth. The issue with anti-intellectuals is that they honestly believe they already know everything there is to know about the topics they’ve taken a stance on. You probably don’t bother verifying that 1+1=2, and an anti-vaxxer doesn’t bother researching vaccines, because they’re just as confident in their stance on them as you are in your stance that 1+1=2.

      • Zephyr@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Its just entropy, challenging views is a higher entropy activity. Not changing them, the mind literally requires less energy and thermal dissipation.