• 6 Posts
  • 253 Comments
Joined 17 days ago
cake
Cake day: June 11th, 2026

help-circle




  • Not me but I’ve known three people now that would swing to absolute extremes on a kinda half year to three year cycle. Like their thing now is they are an ultra atheist and then in a couple months they were the most devout Muslim possible and then ultra this and ultra that, seemed kinda like undiagnosed manic behavior. Very impassioned individuals, pretty intelligent, absolutely convinced in whatever their thing was at that moment, always trying to fight the “enemy” and save the world type stuff but seemingly totally unanchored. The switches would come with some sort of epiphany or a sense they were being tricked or fooled. I bring this up because two of them had done that swing from ultra right to ultra left and then one into kinda political no man’s land conspiracy they’re both out to get you. Haven’t run into the other guy in a while so I’m guessing he has a new crusade by now.


  • Zephyr@sh.itjust.workstoTwitter@lemmy.worldC'mon!
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I’m not saying it’s impossible, just that it typically requires unusual behavior like that or very unusual circumstances such as very large and valuable (typically land) holdings that cannot be sold. Either the wealth gets divided too much or there’s infighting or someone is given the keys to the kingdom and ruins it.




  • Yeah what’s external from the body and mind of an individual is a whole other story aka the society in which they are in. It’s sometimes a dangerous perspective but I do tend to see issues more so as technological issues. With this circumstance it’s not an issue I see with an individual that they feel they don’t match their body but that our technology is so limited that we can’t change form as easily as we change clothes. The illness or lacking isn’t an aspect of the individual but in our current technological abilities as a species. With sufficient technology any will should be unbounded so long as it is not causing needless and avoidable suffering to another sentient being. If for instance we can upload a mind and inhabit a virtual space then we may achieve this sooner than we think. In what we consider “actual” or “physical” reality, it’s going to take a lot more time and effort.



  • Zephyr@sh.itjust.workstoTwitter@lemmy.worldC'mon!
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    I could have sworn I’ve seen a study that said generational wealth dissolves like 99% of the time sometime during or after the third generation, that is it’s exceptionally difficult to maintain wealth for generations upon generations.






  • If for example we had sufficient VR or uploaded consciousness or otherwise sufficient technology we could change form as simply as we breath.

    I am surprised humans have even gotten to this point, we have a lot of baggage from evolution we’re still carrying around.

    The more a comment agrees with the sentiment of a post the less likely someone is to say it is off topic. The less in agreement a comment is the more likely it is someone will say it is off topic and that’s more of an indicator than if it was actually off topic.


  • But it would be something as easy to change as breathing. Arguably for hairless apes birthed from nature we’ve gone much further than I would have imagined had I been introduced to humans for the first time a hundred thousand years ago.

    Sidebar, it’s always interesting what triggers that response of what seems like a natural exploration in a thread and what is considered too off topic. I’ve found it is associated with how well the statement agrees or brings conflict to the primary statement of a post more so than the legitimacy of the comment or how measurably on or off topic it is.