Swedish VPN vendor Mullvad is facing a backlash from some customers after co-founder Daniel Berntsson personally donated SEK 5 million (£385,000, $519,000) to the controversial populist Örebropartiet, which is running in Sweden’s national elections for the first time.

Berntsson has this week published a blog post explaining the donation, alongside posts titled “Immigration,” “Political individualism,” and “Moral individualism.” Before that, he had not posted since 2019.

The flurry of posts follows weeks of customer criticism over the donation – for example, Finnish blog Moonwriting’s post “I’m done with Mullvad.” Another blog, Unutterable, is more direct: “Mullvad funding the far-right and the problem with tech company ownership.” The Hacker News discussion thread about the donations has reached a remarkable 1,784 comments so far.

Mullvad was co-founded and is still jointly owned and run by two CEOs, Berntsson and Fredrik Strömberg. Its name, as reflected in the company’s logo, is Swedish for “mole.” It also offers the Mullvad Browser, a privacy-enhanced fork of Firefox ESR co-developed with the Tor Project. Swedish socialist newspaper Flamman (“The Flame”) revealed the donation in its story “High-profile techie gives millions to the Örebro Party.”

In a post on X, the company said it was devoted to freedom of speech and tolerance, saying: “It should be obvious that Daniel’s private donation to a political party is not part of Mullvad’s values or mission, in the same way that someone’s opinions on animal rights, taxes or public healthcare policy isn’t.”

  • AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Örebro party advocates for “remigration” which is an alt right term for mass deportation or ethnic cleansing. The article is a bit obtuse on this. Basically this means crimes against humanity because it would mean detention centers or concentration camps and insane cruelty. Unfortunately this needs to become the end of Mullvad.

    None of this is really surprising though, backlash is to be expected. Most people in most countries are against mass immigration, which does not make one a fascist. Sweden is now 8.1% Muslim which is a lot to ask of people. Since 1990 it rose from <1% and still seems to be rising. Most are not actually practicing Islam though, only like 25% or so according to the numbers on wikipedia. Which also has been my anecdotal experience in my country.

    The issue is that the large parties do not budge on the neoliberal idea of immigration, to fuel economic growth and depressing wages. So only extremists or fringe parties remain to be voted on. Some people simply feel very strongly about “this is our land”. And in most countries this is completely different than the mostly empty / very low population density USA which is traditionally an immigration country. It is not just a question of ideology. People have a right to feel less than holy thoughts about preserving their homeland. My point is that ignoring these feelings is irresponsible politics. Especially in times of looming economic decline and coming mass refugees from climate change.

    Of course, Örebro is not acceptable because it advocates fascist policies and should be outlawed and all supporters shunned.

  • kingshrubb@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 hours ago

    What VPN do lemmy users recommend? Mullvad founder is funding right wing politics. Proton ceo is praising Trump. PIA has deep ties to Israeli intelligence.

    • oceancloud@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 minutes ago

      I don’t know about Proton. I don’t judge people by what they say, but by what they do. Mullvad is putting its money where it’s mouth is. It doesn’t surprise me that a lot of people who use Mullvad also use Brave.

    • mytilus@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Maybe AirVPN is an option? By their own words it was started by activists to imrpove anonymity and net neutrality. It is quite a bit less ‘sleek’ than proton or mullvad, but I have found it to work fine (you might have to try several servers before you find one that works for you if you want to get around geoblocking, as some of their IPs appear to have been blocked here and there).

      Leaving this recommendation to see if someone replies with news on how they suck as well, because I have not really checked if there were any controversies surrounding them

  • joelfromaus@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Considering the far-right push to obliterate privacy, current and historically, it’s a really poor look for a company with a privacy product.

    It’s rumoured that Australia will look to banning VPNs next for “protecting the children” after recently mandating proof of age laws to a bunch of services like social media and pornography.

  • godsammitdam@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Since there are always people who, purposely or not, misrepresent what’s going on here and I’ve hashed it out in other threads I’ll paste it here as well as some links to share alternatives. Like, how do I see upvotes on a comment saying it’s a marxist far left party? The National Socialists also promised homes and dental and everything good for the Aryan race once they ethnically cleansed the rest. They certainly weren’t any kind of left wing.

    Sorry for the wall of text, copying and pasting from some of my other comments, I’ll bold the main points to create the throughline:

    What, by definition, constitutes fascism?

    Merriam Webster

    often Fascism : a populist political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual, that is associated with a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, and that is characterized by severe economic and social regimentation and by forcible suppression of opposition

    At the core of fascism is loyalty to tribe, ethnic identity, religion, tradition, or, in a word, nation. —Jason Stanley

    Just to make sure we’re not looking at a singular definition, let’s look at Wikipedia too

    Fascism (/ˈfæʃɪzəm/ FASH-iz-əm) is a far-right, authoritarian, and ultranationalist political ideology and movement that rose to prominence in early-20th-century Europe.[1][2][3] Fascism is characterized by support for a dictatorial leader, centralized autocracy, militarism, forcible suppression of opposition, belief in a natural social hierarchy, subordination of individual interests for the perceived interest of the nation or race, and strong regimentation of society and the economy.[3][4] Opposed to communism, democracy, liberalism, pluralism, and socialism,[5][6] fascism is at the far-right of the traditional left–right spectrum.[1][6][7]

    And now, let’s look at what the Örebro party’s own stated platform, which received 72% of its funding from the Mullvad founder, which also amounted to 27 times their total funding in 2024, and has directly led to them stating that with this funding they can field candidates whereby they couldn’t previously:

    Some of its key issues include strong secularism, a 30-hour workweek with retained pay, lowered wages for politicians, ending taxes on energy and fuel, ending taxpayer funding of what it sees as wasteful sculptures, monuments and art, large-scale remigration, expanded social housing, a stricter assimilation policy, and free dental care.[3][4]

    https://www.friatider.se/markus-allard-om-andra-generationens-invandrare-de-ska-ocksa-ut

    Örebro Party leader Markus Allard goes to the election on expulsions. He opens to withdraw citizenship and also expel second generation of immigrants – even if they were born in Sweden. “I’m prepared to cross corpses,” he said.

    One suggestion that he has is that citizenship and permanent residence permits can be torn up – with reference to “Sweden is the country of Swedes”.

    In a section of Yoshi’s Podcast, Allard develops his view on expulsions and explains that he prepared to “go over corpses” to bring home unwanted immigrants. The host notes that there will be no beautiful sight when, for example, immigrant mothers who have been on maternity leave for 15 years are to be deported together with their children. “It’s not going to be pretty to send these people home,” he said. Markus Allard agrees, but says: I think you can handle that optics. Even the children will need to be deported, he explains.

    He further explains that many of the problems relate to second-generation immigrants. They are going out too. Even if they were born in Sweden, because they have no natural connection to Sweden. They are not Swedes. They have not become Swedes. It says Sweden in the passport, but they have not been interested in becoming part of Sweden. There’s a difference. It’s a qualitative difference," Allard said

    And what’s remigration?

    Remigration is a far-right concept referring to the ethnic cleansing[1] via mass deportation of non-white minority populations, especially immigrants and sometimes including native-born citizens, to their place of racial ancestry.[2][3]

    So fascism is about racial and national purity and hierarchy, as we defined, and the Orebro party supports remigration, which is a concept of forcing immigrants out of countries to preserve the purity of “culture” and the race of the nation.

    “Sweden is for the Swedes”

    “Israel is for Israelis”

    “America is for Americans”

    “Germany is for the Germans”

    For those looking for other vpn options:

    https://vpn.techlore.tech/

    https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/u/0/d/1ijfqfLrJWLUVBfJZ_YalVpstWsjw-JGzkvMd6u2jqEk/htmlview#gid=231869418

    • AliOski@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Fascism requires support for an authoritarian dictatorship, among other stances. It is not purely “about racial and national purity and hierarchy”. That’s ethno-nationalism. Yes, fascists are ethno-nationalists, but not every ethno-nationalist is a fascist.

      • godsammitdam@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        And how do you enforce ethnic cleansing? Cause I hate to tell you, but it’s not democratically. Authoritarians simply use democratic methods to shroud legitimacy while ballot spoiling, gerrymandering, or any number of countless methods to undermine said democracy.

        If you can’t understand that tearing up citizenship, thereby removing the ability for constituents to vote, is inherently authoritarian, I can’t help you.

        • AliOski@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          In a democracy you just require a (super)majority for everything necessary to be changed and done to achieve anything.

          It is of course easier in a dictatorship to achieve ethnic cleansing, but doesn’t require one. Look at Turkey and how they treat the Kurds. Not saying they are the best example of a democracy, but it isn’t a dictatorship by definition.

          • TrippingBalls@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            20 minutes ago

            You don’t need a simple majority when you can have a few judges rewrite the interpretation of the existing laws

  • WesternInfidels@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    9 hours ago

    It should be obvious that [founder’s] private donation to a political party is not part of [his company’s] values or mission

    Riiiiiiiiiight, because it always shakes out like that

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    9 hours ago

    There’s no equally good VPN company, by a wide margin.

    This guy’s a rich “libertarian anarchist” who donated to the new party of a marxist he followed because he wants lower taxes and less immigration.

    I don’t really even know what to make of that. Unlike the Proton guy who slobbered on the demented rapist’s bunghole, which I knew exactly what to make of it.

    • crypt0cler1c@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 hours ago

      You will excuse Mullvad but demonize Proton… This shit cannot be made up.

      Olympic level mental gymnastics…

    • Tryenjer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      He’s a fascist painted with a faded red star, but even the Nazi flag used a bit of red. For the well informed, it’s actually a classic.

  • mildseason@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    I made the switch to IPVN and it’s felt exactly the same. Maybe even better. Same price. Servers in multiple locations. Allows routing through 2 VPN servers. No logs. No money going to racist ideology.

    Mullvad can claim whatever they like about their values, but they are a for-profit company. The profits of the company are being used to fund racial segregation. If they believe in their values they’ll switch to a non-profit foundation. Until that time they can get fucked!

      • LadyMeow
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        8 hours ago

        ->libertarian.

        I always read that as ‘far right, but kinda ashamed, or can’t get laid by claiming it so….’

        • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          8 hours ago

          It means “I want to do bad things without consequences” just like free speech absolutist means “I want to say bad things and no one is allowed to call me names”.

          • Azal@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            In the US I’ve been saying “Libertarian is a Republican who wants to smoke weed.” But seeing as they’re not villianizing it much anymore the Libertarians really don’t have a talking point left in the country.

      • crypt0cler1c@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Libertarians are the most laughable spineless morons that I can think of. 99% hypocrisy and 1% innovation.

      • the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I always say there should be a hard cutoff at a million a year and you should be taxed 100% at anything over that.

        • huey_m@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Even from a capitalist perspective this makes sense. Money pooling at the top is money not moving through the economy; 100% taxes encourage reinvestment and philanthropy to avoid the tax.

          • asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            I’m not educated here - how is the money not moving through the economy? Billionaires and trillionaires surely keep their money in a bank / investment accounts right?

            • huey_m@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 minutes ago

              I’m not going to find them now, but if you’re interested, there are a lot of studies that look at how money moves through the economy and which dollars are more impactful. While dollars saved do get reinvested in a roundabout way, their economic impact is pennies on the dollar compared to direct spending or investment into business. It’s just far better for any market economy to prevent dollars from pooling into savings beyond simple prudence and is far better to put them directly to work via spending.

        • Default Username@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I think it would be more effective to have a hard wealth (both liquid and non-liquid assets) cutoff of somewhere between $10-50 million rather than a cap on an annual income.

      • cavitationfetishist2@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        The point of wealth is heyying around limits. You cannot continue to have fungible personal wealth without corruption. It doesn’t even work on a hypothetical philosophical level.

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Yeah, literally 99.999% of products you buy in 2026 fund right wing fascism, and most of it you can’t escape because they own the entire supply chain.

      Ain’t capitalism fun?

      • SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        It really is a matter of degree, though. Even fancy perfume has horse piss in it. It doesn’t mean you might as well wallow in the pigpen.

  • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I have already quit my subscription. Haven’t taken the time to find an alternative yet. I’m stocked up on media for the time being.

  • twinnie@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I found OVPN to be basically the same thing. They’ve actually proven in court that they have no way of logging customer activity.

  • gapa@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    13 hours ago

    The Örebro Party leader is a communist. So not quite far right. And they don’t even have a party program right now. They are still working on it for the 2026 election.

    • lime!@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      12 hours ago

      that’s what i thought, then i read what they actually want from an interview allard did in 2022. he’s basically invented a new class he calls the “transferiat”, which he claims is the main leech on society. the members of this class? public servants, journalists, and people on social security (allard even specifies “immigrants” there). he wants to get rid of this class, in order to achieve smaller government, “higher quality” reporting, and fewer welfare queens.

      that’s a textbook right-conservative agenda.

    • kuiskaaja@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      13 hours ago

      yes, karl marx famously wrote about the deportation of migrants in his book “mein kampf”

        • Leon@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Allard har sedan bildandet av partiet allt mer tagit avstånd från den svenska vänstern, då han menar att den avlägsnat sig från arbetarrörelsens ursprungliga ideal. Han har istället beskrivit sin ideologiska hemvist som populism och nationalism på marxistisk grund, vilket han menar inte går att placera in på den moderna vänster–höger-skalan.

          Mellan 2022 och 2025 medverkade Allard på den av Sverigedemokraterna grundade mediekanalen Riks. Det första avsnittet av programmet med namnet “Allard” hade premiär 5 november 2022. Fokus var att diskutera dagsaktuella samhällsfrågor och intervjuer med andra samhällsdebattörer.

          He himself claims that you can’t really place their politics on the scale, because he picks ideas from both sides. Yeah, their politics are messy, but they have very fascist and white-supremacist overtones, and they gladly work with nazis. So I don’t personally care for trivial bickering about definitions here.

          Dude basically read Ayn Rand and thought “whoa yeah, that’s the shit”, when in actuality it’s just shit.

          Honestly, it’s like when right-wingers want everything privatised and scream that taxation is theft, but they’re totally happy with having taxes pay for their stuff. Just because they like to benefit from socialist policies doesn’t mean that they’re socialists.

        • kuiskaaja@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          30
          ·
          13 hours ago

          yeah and the nazis named themselves national socialists so i dont see your point

          • gapa@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Why do you even bother when you don’t know anything about the party? The leader was kicked out of the youth part of the most leftist party in the parliament in 2014. And he was kicked out for being too extreme left (he had supported the Revolutionary Front). And he started a pod with a guy who had also been kicked out for the same reason.

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revolutionary_Front_(Sweden)

            • HorseFD@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              9 hours ago

              What’s your argument here exactly? That having once held left wing views means all future positions can’t possibly be right wing despite all evidence to the contrary?

            • svullo56@feddit.nu
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              22
              ·
              12 hours ago

              Well. Its well known they have some left options and a lot of far right opinions. Doesn’t matter if he once identified as a extreme leftist. He is now supporting way more far right opinions. It’s just facts. Do as you want with the facts.