• rmuk@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Honestly, the level of doublethink on display by some Apple fans is impressive normally but this is amazing. Apple “defeats” RAM prices by making you pay for something several times over while not actually getting to own it? Fucking bootlickers.

  • dunestorm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I’d rather go back to 2007 and main my Intel Core 2 Duo than rent a PC. We’re going backwards not forwards guys…

  • Art3mis
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 day ago

    This was so insanely predictable. I wouldnt be surprised if all the tech giants move to do the same. “you will own nothing”

  • njordomir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    On a practical note: we need to mock this to the point that anyone who actually does it will instantly be a social pariah. This needs to be so embarrassingly stupid that the companies who offer it literally blush, something non-human entities typically can’t do. Gamers Nexus had a good video about NZXT doing this and broke down the math for the numerically challenged.

    Any other ideas for making this fail in a country where the consumer protection agencies are often worse than nobody paying attention at all?

  • THE_GR8_MIKE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 day ago

    I am so happy I built a new computer at the end of 2024. It may realistically last me two decades at this rate. I got one decade out of the last build.

  • 17jGuFCOn89iY@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    2 days ago

    You’re still paying for the more expensive ram. It’s just baked into a higher monthly rental payment. Why pay more for ram one time when you could pay more for ram every month for the rest of your life?

    • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      When a company says it has a “solution” for the high price, they means they have a “solution” for the big number on the sticker. Not that they actually care about affordability.

      • adarza@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        when the $ numbers start getting big and scary, just extend the length some more to make it look ‘cheaper’… like 8 year car loans and 50 year mortgages.

    • tauisgod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      A lot will. My last company leased their hardware. It cost more in the long run but for reasons I never understood it’s better having expenses paid out of opex versus capex.

  • Tinks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    They’ve been doing it for businesses for decades so this isn’t really surprising honestly