• Catoblepas
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    11 days ago

    If you’ve achieved AGI why can it still not answer very niche questions the way a person would?

    The bottom must be falling out a lot quicker than I thought if Clammy Sammy is already claiming AGI.

  • germanatlas
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    11 days ago

    Subpar mistake-riddled hallucinations are actually generally intelligent in comparison to ai bros

  • The Anti-AI LeaderBannedM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 days ago

    “We achieved AGI”

    Oh, what wishful thinking these delusional people subject themselves to 🙄

  • KEI
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    The reason an LLM cannot become AGI is that it is neither [intelligence] nor [an imitation of intelligence]. [Intelligence] is the [unique thinking process] of living organisms. [Language] is a simple tool. It is a tool for talking with others, and a tool for [thinking] that talks with oneself. There are already scholars who recognize these problems, but under [power] and [capital], they are losing the power of speech.