nifty@lemmy.worldBanned to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 years agoStop using floatslemmy.worldimagemessage-square79linkfedilinkarrow-up1774
arrow-up1774imageStop using floatslemmy.worldnifty@lemmy.worldBanned to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 years agomessage-square79linkfedilink
minus-squarefrezik@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 years agoWouldn’t noise in the circuit mean it’d only be reliable to certain level of precision, anyway?
minus-squareChadus_Maximus@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoI mean, every irrational number used in computation is reliable to a certain level of precision. Just because the current (heh) methods aren’t precise enough doesn’t mean they’ll never be.
minus-squareantonlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoYou can always increase the precision of a computation, analog signals are limited by quantum physics.
Wouldn’t noise in the circuit mean it’d only be reliable to certain level of precision, anyway?
I mean, every irrational number used in computation is reliable to a certain level of precision. Just because the current (heh) methods aren’t precise enough doesn’t mean they’ll never be.
You can always increase the precision of a computation, analog signals are limited by quantum physics.